scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus document on the implementation of next generation sequencing in the genetic diagnosis of hereditary cancer.

TLDR
The aim of these guidelines is to establish a framework of useful recommendations for planned and controlled implementation of NGS in the context of hereditary cancer, to consolidate the strengths and opportunities offered by this technology, and minimise the weaknesses and threats which may derive from its use.
Abstract
Genetic diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndromes offers the opportunity to establish more effective predictive and preventive measures for the patient and their families. The ultimate objective is to decrease cancer morbidity and mortality in high genetic risk families. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers an important improvement in the efficiency of genetic diagnosis, allowing an increase in diagnostic yield with a substantial reduction in response times and economic costs. Consequently, the implementation of this new technology is a great opportunity for improvement in the clinical management of affected families. The aim of these guidelines is to establish a framework of useful recommendations for planned and controlled implementation of NGS in the context of hereditary cancer. These will help to consolidate the strengths and opportunities offered by this technology, and minimise the weaknesses and threats which may derive from its use. The recommendations of international societies have been adapted to our environment, taking the Spanish context into account at organisational and juridical levels. Forty-one statements are grouped under six headings: clinical and diagnostic utility, informed consent and genetic counselling pre-test and post-test, validation of analytical procedures, results report, management of information and distinction between research and clinical context. This guide has been developed by the Spanish Association of Human Genetics (AEGH), the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mutational Screening of BRCA1/2 Genes as a Predictive Factor for Therapeutic Response in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Consensus Guide from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP-IAP) and the Spanish Society of Human Genetics (AEGH)

TL;DR: This consensus guide represents a collection of technical recommendations to address the detection of BRCA1/2 mutations in the molecular diagnostic testing strategy for OC and provides some references, quality parameters, and genomic tools aimed to standardize and facilitate the clinical genomic diagnosis of OC.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice

TL;DR: The clinical applications and limitations of genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice are summarized, focusing on next-generation sequencing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving Genetic Testing in Hereditary Cancer by RNA Analysis: Tools to Prioritize Splicing Studies and Challenges in Applying American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines.

TL;DR: This study highlights the importance of RNA studies to improve variant classification and evidences the challenge of incorporating these results into generic ACMG guidelines and the need to refine these criteria gene-specifically.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

TL;DR: The GLOBOCAN series of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as mentioned in this paper provides estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality from 27 major cancers and for all cancers combined for 2012.
Journal ArticleDOI

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

TL;DR: Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends thatclinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved laboratory, with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or the equivalent.
Journal ArticleDOI

ClinGen — The Clinical Genome Resource

TL;DR: A patient’s family pursues genetic testing that shows a “likely pathogenic” variant for the condition on the basis of a study in an original research publication, and a different variant is found that is determined to be pathogenic.
Related Papers (5)