Control and single-shot readout of an ion embedded in a nanophotonic cavity.
read more
Citations
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Of Transition Ions
Single-Photon Switching and Entanglement of Solid-State Qubits in an Integrated Nanophotonic System
An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum optical networks
Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects
Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware
References
Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid
The quantum internet
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres
Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What is the effect of launching microwaves through this waveguide?
Launching microwaves through this waveguide gives rise to an oscillating magnetic field along the crystal c-axis, which enables driving of the desired transitions (|0〉 → |1〉) at zero-field.
Q3. What is the purpose of the PLE scans?
These PLE scans are taken with Rabi frequencies > 10 MHz to intentionally power-broaden the optical transitions of the ions and enable coarser and faster scans.
Q4. How is the initialization of the qubit subspace estimated?
From the observed count rate, optical branching ratio and detection efficiency, the initialization into the qubit subspace is estimated to be > 95%.
Q5. How is light coupled into and out of these devices?
Light is coupled into and out of these devices via total internal reflection using 45 degree couplers fabricated on both sides of the device.
Q6. How is the optical branching ratio measured?
The optical branching ratio is measured directly by initializing the ion into |1〉g and measuring the optical pumping of the population as a function of the number of optical read pulses applied.
Q7. What is the reason for the quasi-static fluctuations in the optical transition frequency?
One possible cause of these quasi-static fluctuations in the optical transition frequency is the magnetic dipole-dipole, or superhyperfine (SHF), interaction between the Yb electron spin and host nuclei, specifically vanadium (IV = 7/2) and yttrium (IY = 1/2).
Q8. What is the photon count distribution for the ion in 0g?
The photon count distribution for the ion initialized in |0〉g will be determined by the background count rate Γbg due to detector dark counts, light leakage, or fluorescence from other ions in the crystal.
Q9. What is the optical decay rate of the atom in the cavity?
The optical decay rate of the atom in the nanophotonic cavity, γcav , is enhanced from its free space value γ0 = 1/(267 µs) byγcav γ0 = 1 +4g2 κγ0 = 1 + η, (S1)where the authors have assumed that the cavity is resonant with the optical transition.
Q10. How many Yb isotopes are in the cavity?
From optical absorption measurements in bulk crystals and glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS, EAG laboratories), the total concentration of all Yb isotopes is estimated to be 0.14 ppm.
Q11. How many times is the ion initialized into the qubit subspace?
The single ion is first initialized into the qubit subspace by optical pumping out of |aux〉 on transition F, which consists of two 2.5 µs pulses alternating between the two split transitions discussed earlier (Fig. S4) with a total repetition rate of 100 kHz.
Q12. Why is the qubit optically read out on transition A?
As mentioned earlier, the qubit is optically read out on transition A, because transition E overlaps with the optical transition of the zero-spin isotope.
Q13. What is the coupling rate of the input mirror of the cavity?
The coupling rate of the input mirror of the cavity, κin, is extracted from the cavity reflection spectrum (Fig. 1D) to be κin/κ ≈ 0.14.
Q14. How is the CPMG sequence decoupled from the narrowband noise?
By operating with pulse separations at integer multiples of the coherence revival time, the spin-qubit is effectively decoupled from this narrowband noise as shown in Fig. 3C.
Q15. What is the photon count distribution for the ion in |1g?
The photon count distribution for the ion in |1〉g will be a convolution of the counts due the ion and the background:P|1〉g (Ntot = n) = n∑k=0 P(Nion = k)P(Nbg = n − k), (S12)Where Ntot = Nbg +
Q16. Why is the initialization pulse not sufficient?
The single initialization pulse is not sufficient in this case to completely initialize the ion into |1〉g before each readout, but was chosen to enable faster repetition of the experiment.