Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review
Andrew Anglemyer,Theresa Hm Moore,Lisa Parker,Tim Chambers,Alice Grady,Kellia Chiu,Matthew Parry,Magdalena Wilczynska,Ella Flemyng,Lisa Bero +9 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A rapid review on the effectiveness of digital solutions to contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks to assess the benefits, harms, and acceptability of personal digital contact tracing solutions for identifying contacts of an identified positive case of an infectious disease.Abstract:
Background Reducing the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global priority. Contact tracing identifies people who were recently in contact with an infected individual, in order to isolate them and reduce further transmission. Digital technology could be implemented to augment and accelerate manual contact tracing. Digital tools for contact tracing may be grouped into three areas: 1) outbreak response; 2) proximity tracing; and 3) symptom tracking. We conducted a rapid review on the effectiveness of digital solutions to contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks. Objectives To assess the benefits, harms, and acceptability of personal digital contact tracing solutions for identifying contacts of an identified positive case of an infectious disease. Search methods An information specialist searched the literature from 1 January 2000 to 5 May 2020 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. Additionally, we screened the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs, quasi-RCTs, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and modelling studies, in general populations. We preferentially included studies of contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks (including COVID-19, Ebola, tuberculosis, severe acute respiratory syndrome virus, and Middle East respiratory syndrome) as direct evidence, but considered comparative studies of contact tracing outside an outbreak as indirect evidence. The digital solutions varied but typically included software (or firmware) for users to install on their devices or to be uploaded to devices provided by governments or third parties. Control measures included traditional or manual contact tracing, self-reported diaries and surveys, interviews, other standard methods for determining close contacts, and other technologies compared to digital solutions (e.g. electronic medical records). Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently screened records and all potentially relevant full-text publications. One review author extracted data for 50% of the included studies, another extracted data for the remaining 50%; the second review author checked all the extracted data. One review author assessed quality of included studies and a second checked the assessments. Our outcomes were identification of secondary cases and close contacts, time to complete contact tracing, acceptability and accessibility issues, privacy and safety concerns, and any other ethical issue identified. Though modelling studies will predict estimates of the effects of different contact tracing solutions on outcomes of interest, cohort studies provide empirically measured estimates of the effects of different contact tracing solutions on outcomes of interest. We used GRADE-CERQual to describe certainty of evidence from qualitative data and GRADE for modelling and cohort studies. Main results We identified six cohort studies reporting quantitative data and six modelling studies reporting simulations of digital solutions for contact tracing. Two cohort studies also provided qualitative data. Three cohort studies looked at contact tracing during an outbreak, whilst three emulated an outbreak in non-outbreak settings (schools). Of the six modelling studies, four evaluated digital solutions for contact tracing in simulated COVID-19 scenarios, while two simulated close contacts in non-specific outbreak settings. Modelling studies Two modelling studies provided low-certainty evidence of a reduction in secondary cases using digital contact tracing (measured as average number of secondary cases per index case - effective reproductive number (R eff)). One study estimated an 18% reduction in R eff with digital contact tracing compared to self-isolation alone, and a 35% reduction with manual contact-tracing. Another found a reduction in R eff for digital contact tracing compared to self-isolation alone (26% reduction) and a reduction in R eff for manual contact tracing compared to self-isolation alone (53% reduction). However, the certainty of evidence was reduced by unclear specifications of their models, and assumptions about the effectiveness of manual contact tracing (assumed 95% to 100% of contacts traced), and the proportion of the population who would have the app (53%). Cohort studies Two cohort studies provided very low-certainty evidence of a benefit of digital over manual contact tracing. During an Ebola outbreak, contact tracers using an app found twice as many close contacts per case on average than those using paper forms. Similarly, after a pertussis outbreak in a US hospital, researchers found that radio-frequency identification identified 45 close contacts but searches of electronic medical records found 13. The certainty of evidence was reduced by concerns about imprecision, and serious risk of bias due to the inability of contact tracing study designs to identify the true number of close contacts. One cohort study provided very low-certainty evidence that an app could reduce the time to complete a set of close contacts. The certainty of evidence for this outcome was affected by imprecision and serious risk of bias. Contact tracing teams reported that digital data entry and management systems were faster to use than paper systems and possibly less prone to data loss. Two studies from lower- or middle-income countries, reported that contact tracing teams found digital systems simpler to use and generally preferred them over paper systems; they saved personnel time, reportedly improved accuracy with large data sets, and were easier to transport compared with paper forms. However, personnel faced increased costs and internet access problems with digital compared to paper systems. Devices in the cohort studies appeared to have privacy from contacts regarding the exposed or diagnosed users. However, there were risks of privacy breaches from snoopers if linkage attacks occurred, particularly for wearable devices. Authors' conclusions The effectiveness of digital solutions is largely unproven as there are very few published data in real-world outbreak settings. Modelling studies provide low-certainty evidence of a reduction in secondary cases if digital contact tracing is used together with other public health measures such as self-isolation. Cohort studies provide very low-certainty evidence that digital contact tracing may produce more reliable counts of contacts and reduce time to complete contact tracing. Digital solutions may have equity implications for at-risk populations with poor internet access and poor access to digital technology. Stronger primary research on the effectiveness of contact tracing technologies is needed, including research into use of digital solutions in conjunction with manual systems, as digital solutions are unlikely to be used alone in real-world settings. Future studies should consider access to and acceptability of digital solutions, and the resultant impact on equity. Studies should also make acceptability and uptake a primary research question, as privacy concerns can prevent uptake and effectiveness of these technologies.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
TL;DR: The COVID-19 Commission report as mentioned in this paper provides a conceptual framework for understanding pandemics and proposes guideposts for strengthening the multilateral system to address global emergencies and to achieve sustainable development.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Jeffrey D. Sachs,Salim S. Abdool Karim,Lara B. Aknin,J. Allen,Kirsten Brosbøl,Francesca Colombo,Gabriela Cuevas Barron,María Fernanda Espinosa,Vitor Gaspar,Alejandro Gaviria,Andy Haines,Peter J. Hotez,Phoebe Koundouri,Felipe Larraín Bascuñán,Jong Koo Lee,Muhammad Pate,Gabriela Ramos,K.S. Reddy,Ismail Serageldin,John Thwaites,Vaira Vike-Freiberga,Chen Wang,Miriam Were,Lan Xue,Chandrika Bahadur,Maria Elena Bottazzi,Chris Bullen,George Laryea-Adjei,Yanis Ben Amor,O. Karadag,Guillaume Lafortune,Emma Torres,Lauren Barredo,Juliana G E Bartels,Neena Joshi,Margaret Hellard,Uyen Kim Huynh,Shweta Khandelwal,Jeffrey V. Lazarus,Susan Michie +39 more
TL;DR: The winners will be announced at a special ceremony in New York later this month.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Effects of COVID-19 Spread on the Egyptian Exchange Sectors: Winners and Losers across Time (preprint)
Nader Alber,Refaat A +1 more
TL;DR: Methods that can objectively verify the patient’s claims (medical facility records, Global Positioning System, card transactions, and closed-circuit television) were used for the recent ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 contact investigations in South Korea.
Journal ArticleDOI
A population-based controlled experiment assessing the epidemiological impact of digital contact tracing.
Pablo Rodríguez,Santiago Graña,Eva Elisa Alvarez-León,Manuela Battaglini,Francisco Javier Darias,Miguel A. Hernán,R. López,Paloma Llaneza,Maria Cristina Martín,Oriana Ramirez-Rubio,Adriana Romaní,Berta Suárez-Rodríguez,Javier Sánchez-Monedero,Alex Arenas,Lucas Lacasa +14 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report the results of a 4-week population-based controlled experiment that took place in La Gomera (Canary Islands, Spain) between June and July 2020, where they assessed the epidemiological impact of the Spanish DCT app Radar Covid.
Posted ContentDOI
The timing of COVID-19 transmission
Luca Ferretti,Alice Ledda,Chris Wymant,Lele Zhao,Virginia Ledda,Lucie Abeler Dorner,Michelle Kendall,Anel Nurtay,Hao-Yuan Cheng,Ta-Chou Ng,Hsien-Ho Lin,Rob Hinch,Joanna Masel,A. Marm Kilpatrick,Christophe Fraser +14 more
TL;DR: For symptomatic individuals, the timing of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is more strongly linked to the onset of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 than to the time since infection, and the pre-symptomatic infectious period extended further back in time for individuals with longer incubation periods.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Dynamic Transmission Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-5
Richard Pitman,David N. Fisman,Gregory S. Zaric,Maarten J. Postma,Mirjam Kretzschmar,John Edmunds,Marc Brisson +6 more
TL;DR: Best practice recommendations for state-transition modeling are provided, directed both to modelers and to users of modeling results such as clinicians, clinical guideline developers, manufacturers, or policymakers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series
Simon Lewin,Simon Lewin,Andrew Booth,Claire Glenton,Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas,Arash Rashidian,Arash Rashidian,Megan Wainwright,Meghan A. Bohren,Özge Tunçalp,Christopher J. Colvin,Ruth Garside,Benedicte Carlsen,Etienne V. Langlois,Jane Noyes +14 more
TL;DR: The rationale and conceptual basis for CERQual, the aims of the approach, how the approach was developed, and its main components are described, including the purpose and structure of this series and the growing role for qualitative evidence in decision-making are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys
TL;DR: It is found that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long contacts have a large reporting probability, and that the durations of contacts tend to be overestimated in the diaries, and the overall structure of the contact network is correctly captured by both networks of self-reported contacts and of friendships.
Posted Content
Contact Tracing Mobile Apps for COVID-19: Privacy Considerations and Related Trade-offs
TL;DR: This document is a response to some of the privacy characteristics of direct contact tracing apps like TraceTogether and an early-stage Request for Comments to the community to encourage community efforts to develop alternative effective solutions with stronger privacy protection for the users.
Related Papers (5)
Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts
Joel Hellewell,Sam Abbott,Amy Gimma,Nikos I Bosse,Christopher I Jarvis,Timothy W Russell,James D Munday,Adam J. Kucharski,W. John Edmunds,Fiona Yueqian Sun,Stefan Flasche,Billy J Quilty,Nicholas B. Davies,Yang Liu,Samuel Clifford,Petra Klepac,Mark Jit,Charlie Diamond,Hamish Gibbs,Kevin van Zandvoort,Sebastian Funk,Rosalind M Eggo +21 more