Direct conversion of methane to aromatics in a catalytic co-ionic membrane reactor
read more
Citations
Direct Conversion of Methane to Value-Added Chemicals over Heterogeneous Catalysts: Challenges and Prospects
Hydrophobic zeolite modification for in situ peroxide formation in methane oxidation to methanol
Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production
Chemical reactivity under nanoconfinement
Room-Temperature Methane Conversion by Graphene-Confined Single Iron Atoms
References
Advanced anodes for high-temperature fuel cells
Direct, Nonoxidative Conversion of Methane to Ethylene, Aromatics, and Hydrogen
Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures
Aspects of the formation and mobility of protonic charge carriers and the stability of perovskite-type oxides
Synthesis and characterization of the MCM-22 zeolite
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (22)
Q2. What is the effect of steam on the catalyst stability in the CMR?
The BZCY72 membrane enables the concomitant transport of oxide ions towards thecatalytic reaction medium where they rapidly oxidize the produced H2 to steam at the electrode (16).
Q3. What is the main hypothesis behind the CMR?
A key hypothesis motivating the CMR is that in situ extraction of H2 will shift theequilibrium of the formation of aromatics and this will have major consequences in the process industrialization.
Q4. What is the effect of steam on the aromatic yield in the CMR?
By increasing the magnitude of the imposed co-ionic current, the aromatic yield raises and surpasses the theoretical equilibrium yield (12.3%) at H2 extraction rates above 50%.
Q5. What is the common reaction for MDA?
The MDA reaction is conventionally run at around 700ºC in presence of bifunctional catalysts comprising carbided molybdenum nanoclusters dispersed in acidic shape-selective zeolites such as ZSM-5 and MCM-22 (1).
Q6. What is the effect of the reduced coking rate on the catalyst?
As a consequence of the oxide ion supply and the resulting reduced coking, the catalyst degradation rate drastically drops by a factor of 6 with respect to the FBR at low extraction rates and then continues decreasing smoother at increasing currents (Fig. 3B).
Q7. What mechanism is responsible for the increased coke suppression in the CMR?
The steam-promoted coke suppression during MDA has also been reported for an oxygen-permeable membrane reactor (18) and likely occurs by a mechanism involving scavenging of reactive carbon from the catalyst surface via steam reforming (19), which accounts for the observed formation of CO (Fig. 2b).
Q8. What is the effect of the oxygen injection on the catalyst stability?
the distributed O2 injection allowed by the BZCY72 membrane effectively reduces the coking rate while preserving the structural integrity of the zeolite and active Mo-carbide sites.
Q9. What is the effect of steam on the stability of the catalysts?
Whereas the observed decrease in both conversion and aromatics selectivity (Fig. S4) is thermodynamically consistent (17), post-reaction characterization of the spent catalysts by TGA and TPO analyses shows that the improved stability achieved in the CMR is ascribed to the inhibition of coke formation by the in situ generated steam (Fig. S5).
Q10. What is the way to stabilize the catalyst?
Strategies based on finetuning the zeolite acidity and porosity and co-feeding small amounts of CO2, CO, H2, and H2O with methane were applied to stabilize the catalyst by restraining coking, but with limited success (2, 6, 7).
Q11. What is the typical CO concentration at the reactor inlet?
By including a methanation stage, CO is converted to methane and steam giving a typical H2 concentration of 5% at the reactor inlet (Fig. S7).
Q12. What is the description of the CMR system?
Worth to note is the almost instant catalytic response (also for conversion, see Fig. S2) to ON-OFF switching as well as to changes in the intensity of the imposed electrical current, which empowers their CMR system with the ability to accurately tune the catalytic performance.
Q13. What is the effect of the coke-suppression mechanism?
As expected from the coke-suppression mechanism operating in the CMR, CO formation is negligible when no current is imposed and raises parallel to the aromatics yield with increasing co-ionic currents (Fig. 3A).
Q14. What is the reaction yield in the FBR?
In consequence, while thearomatics yield lowers to only ∼1.5% in the FBR after 45 h of reaction, it remains as high as∼9% in the CMR, translating into a two-fold increase in the cumulative yield (Fig. 2C).
Q15. What is the effect of the oxygen injection on the stability of the catalyst?
This indicates that the controlled and distributed oxygen injection is more effective in improving the catalyst stability than the continuous external addition of steam.
Q16. What is the effect of steam on the stability of the catalyst?
a higher average Mo oxidation state is inferred for the catalyst used in the FBR experiment co-fed with 0.9 mol% steam, which might imply a certain loss of active molybdenum carbide species by reoxidation (19).
Q17. What is the effect of steam on the performance of the catalyst in the FBR?
The authors therefore investigated the isolated effect of steam on the performance of 6Mo/MCM-22 catalyst in the FBR by co-feeding 0.25-0.9 mol% steam together with methane, corresponding to steam concentrations within the range achieved by the oxygen injection in their CMR.
Q18. What is the kinetics of a synloop process?
(C) Carbon efficiency of a synloop process using co-ionic CMR (700 °C, 3 bar) for two different H2 extraction: 50 and 80% compared with plants based on Pd-membrane CMR (4) and FBR with external H2 removal (polymer membrane) (20).
Q19. What is the main idea behind the novel approach?
The authors here present a novel approach to circumvent the current limitations of MDAreaction by integrating an ion-conducting membrane in the catalytic reactor.
Q20. What grants have been awarded to the ALBA Synchrotron Light Laboratory?
This work has been supported by the Research Council of Norway (195912, 210418, 210765 and 219194 grants) and Spanish Government (SEV-2012-0267 grant).
Q21. What is the striking result of the CMR?
The most striking result in Fig. 2A is, certainly, the excellent stability of the catalyst in the CMR, with an average decay rate about one order of magnitude lower than that observed in the conventional FBR.
Q22. What is the catalyst behaviour in the FBR?
The catalyst behaviour in the FBR is fully representative of the state-of-the-art at standard MDA conditions: the aromatics yield initially increases during the induction period, reaches a maximum of ca. 10%, and rapidly falls as the reaction progresses.