scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Inequality and ecosystem services: The value and social distribution of Niger Delta wetland services

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors investigated the value and distribution of wetland ecosystem service benefits and costs across the three main stakeholder sectors (local community, government and corporate) and found that the net monetary value of the wetlands is $11,000 per delta household of which $9000 was generated as cash income supporting household activities such as education and healthcare.
Abstract
The Niger Delta wetlands are of international importance for their biodiversity, and support a large human population. The value and distribution of wetland ecosystem service benefits and costs across the three main stakeholder sectors (local community, government and corporate) were investigated. Results show that the net monetary value of the wetlands is $11,000 per delta household of which $9000 was generated as cash income supporting household activities such as education and healthcare. The total annual value of provisioning services to local people is approximately $25 billion, about three times the value of oil production in the region. However, local communities also bear about 75% of the environmental costs of oil extraction, equivalent to about 19% of the oil industry profit. Local people, who experience considerable economic hardship and lack alternative income sources, receive little compensation from the oil sector. These results highlight the importance of understanding not only the benefits provided by Niger Delta wetlands, but also the distribution of the environmental costs associated with their use. We conclude that ecosystem service valuation studies should give greater attention to the social distribution of identified values. Such distributional analyses, rarely available, provide insight into how sustainable natural resource management policy and practice could be better aligned to social justice concerns.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria

TL;DR: It is advocated that the conservation of the natural ecosystem should be a priority in future land-use management in Nigeria, a country highly vulnerable to climate change and incessantly impacted by natural disasters such as flooding.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biodiversity’s contributions to sustainable development

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the breadth of ways in which biodiversity can support sustainable development and use the SDGs as a basis for exploring scientific evidence of the benefits delivered by biodiversity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Did improvements of ecosystem services supply-demand imbalance change environmental spatial injustices?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored changes in the supply demand of ecosystem services and their natural and social driving mechanisms using spatial analysis methodologies as well as the relationship between the supply-demand of ecosystem service and environmental justice in coastal regions in China.
Journal ArticleDOI

Managing rivers for multiple benefits – a coherent approach to research, policy and planning

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that physical and social structures and processes are necessary to realize multiple benefits from river ecosystems, and that these structures, in the form of (formal and informal) institutions and (gray and green) infrastructure, shape how benefits accrue to different groups in society.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing wetland degradation and loss of ecosystem services in the Niger Delta, Nigeria

TL;DR: Assessment of spatiotemporal changes in two wetlands in the Niger Delta by using satellite data from 1984 to 2011 and GIS methods shows that both wetlands have experienced substantial degradation, particularly with respect to the area of forest lost.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors have estimated the current economic value of 17 ecosystem services for 16 biomes, based on published studies and a few original calculations, for the entire biosphere, the value (most of which is outside the market) is estimated to be in the range of US$16-54 trillion (10^(12)) per year, with an average of US $33 trillion per year.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in the global value of ecosystem services

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided an updated estimate based on updated unit ecosystem service values and land use change estimates between 1997 and 2011, using the same methods as in the 1997 paper but with updated data, the estimate for the total global ecosystem services in 2011 is $125 trillion/yr (assuming updated unit values and changes to biome areas).
Book

Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment

J. Alcamo
TL;DR: The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) as discussed by the authors is a conceptual framework for analysis and decision-making of ecosystems and human well-being that was developed through interactions among the experts involved in the MA as well as stakeholders who will use its findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a special issue on the topic of income diversification and livelihoods in rural Africa: Cause and Consequence of change, where the authors concentrate on core conceptual issues that bedevil the literature on rural income diversity and the policy implications of the empirical evidence presented in this special issue.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (19)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Inequality and ecosystem services: the value and social distribution of niger delta wetland services" ?

These results highlight the importance of understanding not only the benefits provided by Niger Delta wetlands, but also th e distribution of the environmental costs associated with their use. 

The household (people wh live and eat together, and share the same kitchen and toilet facilities) was used as the unit of analysis for the survey, with the questionnaire administered to the head of each houseold. 

Each cropping household has access to an average of three plots, of about 0.11 ha each, where the main crops grown are cassava, yam, cocoyam, maize, sugarcane, and varieties of vegetables (although over 60 crop types were identified for the delta wetlands). 

The importance of the wetland as a source of food is emphasised by the fact that half the gross value of cropping is used for subsistence purposes. 

Before oil became an important source of revenue to the Nigerian government (pre-1960), derivation was 100%, meaning that host communities had almost total control of the benefits from the resources of their area. 

When natives do fell trees it is to build their own huts or canoes (which take 6-12 months to build), and the activity is small scale, but many non-resident individuals and companies log in the wetlands. 

Local people, who experience considerable economic hardship and lack alternative income sources, receive little compensation from the oil sector. 

local communities also bear about 75% of the environmental costs of oil extraction, equivalent to about 19% of the oil industry profit. 

About 75% of the gross monetary value of material collection was in cash income, with fishing, cropping, hunting and logging at 80%, 51%, 69% and 96% respectively (the lower value for cropping is because this is primarily for household subsistence food). 

The government is generally responsible for dredging and the reclamation of wetlands, which result in increased incidences of flooding and erosion. 

The value of ecosystem services globally was first estimated by Costanza et al. (1997), at around $33 trillion per year, after which interest in ecosystem service valuation has grown strongly. 

The oil revenue generated for the government from the delta is substantial, yet s only about a quarter of the value of the delta’s provisioning services. 

The Niger Delta is regarded as the third largest wetland in the world (Uluocha and Okeke 2004; Umoh 2008), and the largest river delta and mangrove ecosystem with the greatest extension of freshwater swamps in Africa ( jonina et al. 

Ecosystem service values can be expressed using sociological or ecological metrics, but are most are often expressed in monetary terms (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003). 

Such concerns find common ground in the environmental justice movement, which in Western nations, has seen concerns expressed around disproportionate exposure to toxic risk of poor and coloured communities compared to white middle class communities (Cutter 1995) and, increasingly, with unequal access to the prerequisite environmental information and capacity to challenge environmental decisions (Fish 2011; Reed and George 2011). 

The high cash income is explained by the size of the Niger Delta wetlands which provide numerous commercial exploitation opportunities, coupled with easy market access with buyers from major Nigerian cities in the markets on daily basis. 

The cost of tools such as canoes, hoes, cutlass and axes used for collecting wetland provisioning services was calculated using linear depreciation; costs of tools at the time of purchase are divided by average length of use suggested during interview and focus group discussions. 

Th s underscore the need to develop managing institutions that recognise the value and significance of delta ecoservices, and how value is socially distributed. 

Much of the early work on ecosystem services valuation focused on wetlands primarily to demonstrate their hig value to a wider audience (Turpie et al. 2010), especially those in parts of the world where wetlands were viewed as wasteland with no economic value (Mmopelwa 2006).