scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nitric oxide and cancer.

Jordi Muntané, +1 more
- 27 Sep 2010 - 
- Vol. 2, Iss: 9, pp 337-344
TLDR
The multiple actions of NO in the tumor environment is related to heterogeneous cell responses with particular attention in the regulation of the stress response mediated by the hypoxia inducible factor-1 and p53 generally leading to growth arrest, apoptosis or adaptation.
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is a lipophilic, highly diffusible and short-lived physiological messenger which regulates a variety of important physiological responses including vasodilation, respiration, cell migration, immune response and apoptosis. NO is synthesized by three differentially gene-encoded NO synthase (NOS) in mammals: neuronal NOS (nNOS or NOS-1), inducible NOS (iNOS or NOS-2) and endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS-3). All isoforms of NOS catalyze the reaction of L-arginine, NADPH and oxygen to NO, L-citrulline and NADP. NO may exert its cellular action by cGMP-dependent as well as by cGMP-independent pathways including postranslational modifications in cysteine (S-nitrosylation or S-nitrosation) and tyrosine (nitration) residues, mixed disulfide formation (S-nitrosoglutathione or GSNO) or promoting further oxidation protein stages which have been related to altered protein function and gene transcription, genotoxic lesions, alteration of cell-cycle check points, apoptosis and DNA repair. NO sensitizes tumor cells to chemotherapeutic compounds. The expression of NOS-2 and NOS-3 has been found to be increased in a variety of human cancers. The multiple actions of NO in the tumor environment is related to heterogeneous cell responses with particular attention in the regulation of the stress response mediated by the hypoxia inducible factor-1 and p53 generally leading to growth arrest, apoptosis or adaptation.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect.

TL;DR: Molecular mechanisms of factors related to the EPR effect, the unique anatomy of tumor vessels, limitations and techniques to avoid such limitations, augmenting tumor drug delivery, and experimental and clinical findings are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The yin and yang of nitric oxide in cancer progression.

TL;DR: The current knowledge in this area of NO modulation is reviewed, with an emphasis placed on NO modulation as an anticancer therapy, focusing on NO-donating drugs and NOS inhibitors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhanced delivery of macromolecular antitumor drugs to tumors by nitroglycerin application

TL;DR: The EPR effect was enhanced by applying nitroglycerin (NG) ointment on the skin of tumor‐bearing animals, and thus enhanced the delivery of the drug to tumors, and enhanced therapeutic effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

The link between infection and cancer: tumor vasculature, free radicals, and drug delivery to tumors via the EPR effect.

TL;DR: The EPR effect is discovered, which led to the rational development of tumor‐selective delivery of polymer conjugates, micellar and liposomal drugs, and genes and the barriers and countermeasures for improved drug delivery to tumors by using nanomedicines are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

A global view of the biochemical pathways involved in the regulation of the metabolism of cancer cells.

TL;DR: Cancer cells increase glucose uptake and reject lactic acid even in the presence of oxygen (Warburg effect) and this metabolism reorients glucose towards the pentose phosphate pathway for ribose synthesis and consumes great amounts of glutamine to sustain nucleotide and fatty acid synthesis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Inflammation and cancer

TL;DR: It is now becoming clear that the tumour microenvironment, which is largely orchestrated by inflammatory cells, is an indispensable participant in the neoplastic process, fostering proliferation, survival and migration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor

TL;DR: NO released from endothelial cells is indistinguishable from EDRF in terms of biological activity, stability, and susceptibility to an inhibitor and to a potentiator.
Journal ArticleDOI

Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide.

TL;DR: It is proposed that superoxide dismutase may protect vascular tissue stimulated to produce superoxide and NO under pathological conditions by preventing the formation of peroxynitrite.
Journal ArticleDOI

Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide.

TL;DR: The vascular effects of EDRF released from perfused bovine intrapulmonary artery and vein were compared with the effects of NO delivered by superfusion over endothelium-denuded arterial and venous strips arranged in a cascade to determine whether nitric oxide (NO) is responsible for the vascular smooth muscle relaxation elicited by endothelia-derived relaxing factor (EDRF).
Journal Article

Mutations in the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene: Clues to Cancer Etiology and Molecular Pathogenesis

TL;DR: The p53 tumor suppressor gene has become a paradigm in cancer research because it is commonly mutated in human cancer and the spectrum of p53 mutations in these cancers is providing clues to the etiology and molecular pathogenesis of neoplasia as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)