scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

John S. Bell
- 01 Nov 1964 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 3, pp 195-200
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, it was shown that even without such a separability or locality requirement, no hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible and that such an interpretation has a grossly nonlocal structure, which is characteristic of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions.
Abstract
THE paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [1] was advanced as an argument that quantum mechanics could not be a complete theory but should be supplemented by additional variables These additional variables were to restore to the theory causality and locality [2] In this note that idea will be formulated mathematically and shown to be incompatible with the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics It is the requirement of locality, or more precisely that the result of a measurement on one system be unaffected by operations on a distant system with which it has interacted in the past, that creates the essential difficulty There have been attempts [3] to show that even without such a separability or locality requirement no "hidden variable" interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible These attempts have been examined elsewhere [4] and found wanting Moreover, a hidden variable interpretation of elementary quantum theory [5] has been explicitly constructed That particular interpretation has indeed a grossly nonlocal structure This is characteristic, according to the result to be proved here, of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory

TL;DR: The present state of mathematically rigorous results about Bell's inequalities in relativistic quantum field theory is reviewed in this article, where the nature of statistical independence of algebras of observables associated to spacelike separated spacetime regions is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comments on entanglement negativity in holographic field theories

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore entanglement negativity in relativistic field theories in various dimensions and show that the negativity of the thermofield double state is given by the free energy difference of the system at temperature T and 2 T respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relations between Entanglement Witnesses and Bell Inequalities

TL;DR: In this paper, the relationship between CHSH witnesses and entanglement witnesses is discussed in detail for the Bell inequality derived by Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
Journal ArticleDOI

Why the quantum

TL;DR: The fundamental significance of the Clifton-Bububub-Halvorson theorem in quantum theory is discussed in this paper. But it is not a theory about the mechanics of nonclassical waves or particles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality.

TL;DR: The relationship between quantum contextuality and models of quantum theory in which the quantum state is maximally epistemic and preparation noncontextual models must be Kochen-Specker non contextual is examined to establish both the impossibility and the implication of Bell's theorem from an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-like argument.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

TL;DR: Consideration of the problem of making predictions concerning a system on the basis of measurements made on another system that had previously interacted with it leads to the result that one is led to conclude that the description of reality as given by a wave function is not complete.
Journal ArticleDOI

Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky

TL;DR: A brief review of the physical significance of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky is given, and it is shown that it involves a kind of correlation of the properties of distant noninteracting systems, which is quite different from previously known kinds of correlation as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)