scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

John S. Bell
- 01 Nov 1964 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 3, pp 195-200
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, it was shown that even without such a separability or locality requirement, no hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible and that such an interpretation has a grossly nonlocal structure, which is characteristic of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions.
Abstract
THE paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [1] was advanced as an argument that quantum mechanics could not be a complete theory but should be supplemented by additional variables These additional variables were to restore to the theory causality and locality [2] In this note that idea will be formulated mathematically and shown to be incompatible with the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics It is the requirement of locality, or more precisely that the result of a measurement on one system be unaffected by operations on a distant system with which it has interacted in the past, that creates the essential difficulty There have been attempts [3] to show that even without such a separability or locality requirement no "hidden variable" interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible These attempts have been examined elsewhere [4] and found wanting Moreover, a hidden variable interpretation of elementary quantum theory [5] has been explicitly constructed That particular interpretation has indeed a grossly nonlocal structure This is characteristic, according to the result to be proved here, of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Verifier-on-a-Leash: New Schemes for Verifiable Delegated Quantum Computation, with Quasilinear Resources

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present two protocols for a classical verifier to verifiably delegate a quantum computation to two non-communicating but entangled quantum provers, with near-optimal complexity in terms of the total resources employed by the verifier and the honest provers.
Book

Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics

Franck Laloë
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a general discussion of several aspects of our present understanding of quantum mechanics, focusing on the very special correlations that this theory makes possible: they are forbidden by very general arguments based on realism and local causality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Local hidden?variable models for entangled quantum states

TL;DR: In this paper, an up-to-date overview of the existing literature regarding local hidden-variable models for entangled quantum states, in both the bipartite and multipartite cases, and discuss some of the most relevant open questions in this context.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon

TL;DR: Two-qubit state tomography reveals that the prepared states match the target maximally entangled Bell states with >96% fidelity, and highlights the important function of the nuclear qubit to expand the computational basis and maximize the readout fidelity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring the Limits of Quantum Nonlocality with Entangled Photons

TL;DR: Using a versatile and high-fidelity source of pairs of polarization-entangled photons, this paper explore the boundary of quantum correlations, demonstrate the counterintuitive effect of more nonlocality with less entanglement, present the most nonlocal correlations ever reported, and achieve quantum correlations requiring the use of complex qubits.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

TL;DR: Consideration of the problem of making predictions concerning a system on the basis of measurements made on another system that had previously interacted with it leads to the result that one is led to conclude that the description of reality as given by a wave function is not complete.
Journal ArticleDOI

Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky

TL;DR: A brief review of the physical significance of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky is given, and it is shown that it involves a kind of correlation of the properties of distant noninteracting systems, which is quite different from previously known kinds of correlation as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)