scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

John S. Bell
- 01 Nov 1964 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 3, pp 195-200
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, it was shown that even without such a separability or locality requirement, no hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible and that such an interpretation has a grossly nonlocal structure, which is characteristic of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions.
Abstract
THE paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [1] was advanced as an argument that quantum mechanics could not be a complete theory but should be supplemented by additional variables These additional variables were to restore to the theory causality and locality [2] In this note that idea will be formulated mathematically and shown to be incompatible with the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics It is the requirement of locality, or more precisely that the result of a measurement on one system be unaffected by operations on a distant system with which it has interacted in the past, that creates the essential difficulty There have been attempts [3] to show that even without such a separability or locality requirement no "hidden variable" interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible These attempts have been examined elsewhere [4] and found wanting Moreover, a hidden variable interpretation of elementary quantum theory [5] has been explicitly constructed That particular interpretation has indeed a grossly nonlocal structure This is characteristic, according to the result to be proved here, of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements

TL;DR: In this article, an operational definition of contextuality is introduced which generalizes the standard notion in three ways: (i) it applies to arbitrary operational theories rather than just quantum theory, (ii) it applied to arbitrary experimental procedures instead than just sharp measurements, and (iii) the notion applies to a broad class of ontological models of quantum theory rather than deterministic hidden variable models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics

TL;DR: In the last decade, significant progress has been made towards a consistent and complete reformulation of the Copenhagen interpretation (an interpretation consisting in a formulation of the experimental aspects of physics in terms of the basic formalism; it is consistent if free from internal contradiction as mentioned in this paper.
Book

Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics

TL;DR: The main purpose of as mentioned in this paper is to resolve four basic questions concerning the nature of nature: how mind related to matter, how quantum theory related to reality, how relativity theory reconciled globally with that which locally we experience directly, namely the coming of reality into being or existence, how is relativity theory reconcileed with the apparent demand of Bell's theorem that what happens in one spacetime region must, in certain situations, depend on decisions made in a spacelike-separated region?
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantum correlations in optical angle-orbital angular momentum variables

TL;DR: This demonstration of entanglement in an angular basis establishes that angles are genuine quantum observables and can therefore be considered a resource for quantum information processing, capable of secure, high-dimension, key distribution.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

TL;DR: Consideration of the problem of making predictions concerning a system on the basis of measurements made on another system that had previously interacted with it leads to the result that one is led to conclude that the description of reality as given by a wave function is not complete.
Journal ArticleDOI

Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky

TL;DR: A brief review of the physical significance of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky is given, and it is shown that it involves a kind of correlation of the properties of distant noninteracting systems, which is quite different from previously known kinds of correlation as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)