scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

John S. Bell
- 01 Nov 1964 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 3, pp 195-200
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, it was shown that even without such a separability or locality requirement, no hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible and that such an interpretation has a grossly nonlocal structure, which is characteristic of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions.
Abstract
THE paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [1] was advanced as an argument that quantum mechanics could not be a complete theory but should be supplemented by additional variables These additional variables were to restore to the theory causality and locality [2] In this note that idea will be formulated mathematically and shown to be incompatible with the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics It is the requirement of locality, or more precisely that the result of a measurement on one system be unaffected by operations on a distant system with which it has interacted in the past, that creates the essential difficulty There have been attempts [3] to show that even without such a separability or locality requirement no "hidden variable" interpretation of quantum mechanics is possible These attempts have been examined elsewhere [4] and found wanting Moreover, a hidden variable interpretation of elementary quantum theory [5] has been explicitly constructed That particular interpretation has indeed a grossly nonlocal structure This is characteristic, according to the result to be proved here, of any such theory which reproduces exactly the quantum mechanical predictions

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Noncontextual Hidden Variables and Physical Measurements

TL;DR: In this paper, the Kochen-Specker theorem was generalized to any finite-dimensional system, and it was shown that the existence of hidden variable theories indistinguishable from quantum theory by finite precision measurements in either class can be proven.
Journal ArticleDOI

Complete disentanglement by partial pure dephasing

TL;DR: In this article, the effect of pure dephasing on the entanglement of a pair of two-level subsystems (qubits) was studied, and it was shown that partial de-phasing induced by a super-Ohmic reservoir, corresponding to well-established properties of confined charge states and phonons, may lead to complete disentanglement.
Journal ArticleDOI

More randomness from the same data

TL;DR: Christensen et al. as discussed by the authors showed how private randomness generated during a Bell test can be directly quantified from the observed correlations, without the need to process these data into an inequality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experimental demonstration of the violation of local realism without Bell inequalities

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report on a two-photon coincidence experiment that demonstrates the violation of local realism, as defined by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, by about 45 standard deviations without explicit use of Bell inequalities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Selectivity in probabilistic causality: Where psychology runs into quantum physics

TL;DR: The parallels between this problem and that of selective influences in behavioral sciences is established by observing that noncommuting measurements in quantum physics are mutually exclusive and can be treated as different levels of one and the same factor.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

TL;DR: Consideration of the problem of making predictions concerning a system on the basis of measurements made on another system that had previously interacted with it leads to the result that one is led to conclude that the description of reality as given by a wave function is not complete.
Journal ArticleDOI

Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky

TL;DR: A brief review of the physical significance of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky is given, and it is shown that it involves a kind of correlation of the properties of distant noninteracting systems, which is quite different from previously known kinds of correlation as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)