scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice.

Parikshit S. Sharma, +6 more
- 01 Feb 2015 - 
- Vol. 12, Iss: 2, pp 305-312
TLDR
Permanent HBP without a mapping catheter or a backup right ventricular lead was successfully achieved in 80% of patients and clinical outcomes were better in the HBP group than in the RVP group.
About: 
This article is published in Heart Rhythm.The article was published on 2015-02-01. It has received 307 citations till now.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

Fred M. Kusumoto, +18 more
- 20 Aug 2019 - 
TL;DR: The next generation of scientists and decision-makers will be shaped by the experiences of those who have gone before them and will help shape the future of medicine and science.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing

Mohamed A.E. Abdel-Rahman, +8 more
- 22 May 2018 - 
TL;DR: Permanent HBP was feasible and safe in a large real-world population requiring permanent pacemakers and was associated with reduction in the combined endpoint of death, HFH, or upgrade to BiVP compared to RVP in patients requiring permanentpacemakers.
Journal ArticleDOI

His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.

Daniel L. Lustgarten, +7 more
- 01 Jul 2015 - 
TL;DR: In this crossover comparison between HBP and BiVP, HBP was found to effect an equivalent CRT response, suggesting this approach may be feasible in more patients with left bundle branch block than previously assumed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience

Parikshit S. Sharma, +8 more
- 12 Oct 2017 - 
TL;DR: Permanent His-bundle pacing may be considered as a rescue strategy for failed BVP and may be a reasonable primary alternative to BVP for CRT.
Journal ArticleDOI

Permanent His bundle pacing: Recommendations from a Multicenter His Bundle Pacing Collaborative Working Group for standardization of definitions, implant measurements, and follow-up

Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, +9 more
- 28 Oct 2017 - 
TL;DR: In this article, a set of definitions encompassing the different forms of HBP as well as a standardized approach to gathering data end points to ensure consistency in reported outcomes are defined and discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial.

Bruce L. Wilkoff, +98 more
- 25 Dec 2002 - 
TL;DR: For patients with standard indications for ICD therapy, no indication for cardiac pacing, and an LVEF of 40% or less, dual-chamber pacing offers no clinical advantage over ventricular backup pacing and may be detrimental by increasing the combined end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure.
Journal ArticleDOI

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities

Andrew E. Epstein, +16 more
- 27 May 2008 - 
Journal ArticleDOI

Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction

Michael O. Sweeney, +6 more
- 17 Jun 2003 - 
TL;DR: Ventricular desynchronization imposed by ventricular pacing even when AV synchrony is preserved increases the risk of HF hospitalization and AF in SND with normal baseline QRSd.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction

Gervasio A. Lamas, +18 more
- 13 Jun 2002 - 
TL;DR: Overall, dual-chamber pacing offers significant improvement as compared with ventricular pacing, and reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, reduces signs and symptoms of heart failure, and slightly improves the quality of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes

Stuart J. Connolly, +11 more
- 11 May 2000 - 
TL;DR: Physiologic pacing provides little benefit over ventricular pacing for the prevention of stroke or death due to cardiovascular causes and the effect on the rate of atrial fibrillation was not apparent until two years after implants.
Related Papers (5)

Permanent, Direct His-Bundle Pacing A Novel Approach to Cardiac Pacing in Patients With Normal His-Purkinje Activation

Pramod Deshmukh, +3 more
- 29 Feb 2000 - 

His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.

Daniel L. Lustgarten, +7 more
- 01 Jul 2015 - 

Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing

Mohamed A.E. Abdel-Rahman, +8 more
- 22 May 2018 - 

Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction

Michael O. Sweeney, +6 more
- 17 Jun 2003 - 

Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial.

Bruce L. Wilkoff, +98 more
- 25 Dec 2002 -Â