scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The role of attention in Pavlovian conditioning, and use of auditory and visual stimuli to condition rats is discussed in this article, where the authors discuss the use of both visual and auditory stimuli.
Abstract
Role of attention in Pavlovian conditioning, and use of auditory and visual stimuli to condition rats

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Food anticipation and lever-directed activities in rats

TL;DR: The results of three experiments are interpreted as suggesting that the food-signaling aspects of an appetitive CS and that CS's ability to generate signal-directed behaviors are experimentall separable properties.
Journal ArticleDOI

Underestimating the rat's intelligence

TL;DR: Evidence of cognition in rats from traditional categories as well as from less ordinary test situations is surveyed, suggesting that a form of 'intellectual optimal foraging' may be an apt general description of the rat's cognitive prowess.
Journal ArticleDOI

General learned irrelevance: Proactive effects on Pavlovian conditioning in dogs

TL;DR: This paper showed that prior exposure to random CSs and shocks, but not to signaled shocks or shocks alone, reduced conditioning to the new CS and shocks in a different context, and the role of CS-US noncontingency during preexposure was unclear.
Book ChapterDOI

Ontogeny of Learning

TL;DR: This chapter begins with a brief review of the major premises of the psychological and ethological approaches to the comparative analysis of learning, and considers a few of the reasons for the current paradigm crisis in the experimental analysis oflearning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.

TL;DR: The results showed that outcome maximality and additivity training had an influence on cue competition but that this influence was more pronounced for forward cue competition than for retrospective cue competition.