Q2. What was the second stage of the analysis?
The second stage of the analysis involved a series of multivariable Cox regression models in which the entered psychological variables were derived from a principal component analysis (PCA), which was performed in order to reduce the number of psychological variables by identifying putative latent constructs.
Q3. What is the strongest predictor of TMD onset?
in univariate analyses as well as both multivariable approaches the somatic symptom construct represented the strongest predictor of TMD onset, suggesting convergence of findings regarding somatic symptoms across analytic methods.
Q4. What was the significant predictor of TMD in the unimputed analysis?
The Stress and Negative Affectivity component was a weakly significant predictor in the unimputed analysis, but did not significantly predict TMD onset in the analysis using imputed data (HR=1.12).
Q5. How many follow-up questionnaires did the inception cohort complete?
Of the 3,263 participants enrolled into the inception cohort, 2,737 (84%) completed one or more quarterly follow-up questionnaires, with a median of 10 follow-up questionnaires over a median 2.8 follow-up year period.
Q6. What is the strongest predictor of incident TMD?
While multiple psychological measures predicted TMD onset in univariate analyses, results of multivariable models provide strong evidence that reported somatic symptoms represents the strongest predictor of incident TMD in this analysis.
Q7. What is the principal component associated with the eigenvalues?
When the average eigenvalue from these randomly generated data sets is larger than the corresponding eigenvalue of the original data, then the principal component associated with that eigenvalue is likely to be random noise (see Supplementary e-Figure 1).
Q8. What does the study suggest that stress and negative affect contribute to TMD?
This suggests that Stress and Negative Affectivity does not additively contribute to TMD risk over and above Global Psychological and Somatic Symptoms, rather in the absence of global symptomatology, stress/negative affect emerges as a potentially important risk factor.
Q9. What is the CSQ Ignoring Pain Scale?
For the CSQ Ignoring Pain Sensations scale, TMD incidence was greatest at a score of 0 and decreased in linear fashion until a score of approximately two, beyond which incidence increased slightly.
Q10. How did the parallel analysis determine the number of components to include in a PCA model?
Parallel analysis estimates the number of components to include in a PCA model by generating random data sets with the same numbers of observations and predictor variables as the original data.
Q11. What did the authors find to be the significant predictor of incident TMD?
In univariate analyses, Stress and Negative Affectivity also predicted incident TMD; however, this association became weak or non-significant in multivariable analyses that adjusted for the other principal components.
Q12. What was the effect of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale on the TMD?
the subscales of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Rumination, Magnification, Helplessness) predicted TMD onset to a statistically significant degree, although the Helplessness scale was weakly significant when using imputed data (HR=1.12).