Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review of social prescribing programmes being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service found current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money.Abstract:
Objectives Social prescribing is a way of linking patients in primary care with sources of support within the community to help improve their health and well-being. Social prescribing programmes are being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service and so we conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for their effectiveness. Setting/data sources Nine databases were searched from 2000 to January 2016 for studies conducted in the UK. Relevant reports and guidelines, websites and reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify additional studies. All the searches were restricted to English language only. Participants Systematic reviews and any published evaluation of programmes where patient referral was made from a primary care setting to a link worker or facilitator of social prescribing were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for included studies was undertaken independently by two reviewers and a narrative synthesis was performed. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes of interest were any measures of health and well-being and/or usage of health services. Results We included a total of 15 evaluations of social prescribing programmes. Most were small scale and limited by poor design and reporting. All were rated as a having a high risk of bias. Common design issues included a lack of comparative controls, short follow-up durations, a lack of standardised and validated measuring tools, missing data and a failure to consider potential confounding factors. Despite clear methodological shortcomings, most evaluations presented positive conclusions. Conclusions Social prescribing is being widely advocated and implemented but current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money. If social prescribing is to realise its potential, future evaluations must be comparative by design and consider when, by whom, for whom, how well and at what cost. Trial registration number PROSPERO Registration: CRD42015023501.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Productivity and Efficiency of Community Gardens: Case Studies from the UK
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors used a citizen science approach to collect data from seven community gardens and one community farm in London, UK in the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons, highlighting the complex nature and relationship between the many benefits and outcomes of urban farms and gardens.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Digital narratives and storytelling to share experiences: social prescribing for social workers and immigrants
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined the effectiveness of digital narrative methods as a means for immigrants who are isolated in their communities and the social workers who support them to share experiences, knowledge and information; identify where problems lie; and examine avenues for problem solving.
Journal ArticleDOI
Increased Social Support Reduces the Incidence of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome
TL;DR: Higher levels of tangible social support, as well as overallsocial support, were associated with reduced risk for MCR in older adults, and increasing social support may be a promising avenue of intervention for reducing the risk of MCR, dementia, and other forms of cognitive decline.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Systematic Review of Electronic Community Resource Referral Systems.
Juan Yanguela,Anish Khanna,Sara O'Brien,Ethan Phillips,Malcolm Bevel,Giselle Corbie,Gaurav Dave +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper , a systematic review identifies barriers and facilitators that influence CRRS implementation in the United States (US) by identifying and synthesizing peer-reviewed literature over a 15-year period.
Journal ArticleDOI
Are loneliness and social isolation equal threats to health and well-being? An outcome-wide longitudinal approach
edu,Andreas Vierecke +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined how changes in loneliness and social isolation over a 4-year follow-up period (from t0:2008/2010 to t1:2012/2014) were associated with 32 indicators of physical-, behavioral-, and psychosocial health outcomes 4-years later (t2:2016/2018).
References
More filters
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance
TL;DR: The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Daisy Goodman,Daisy Goodman,Paul B. Batalden,Paul B. Batalden,Frank Davidoff,David Stevens +11 more
TL;DR: The development of SQUIRE 2.0 is described, intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
TL;DR: Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report, and there is insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions.
Related Papers (5)
Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes
Social prescribing in general practice: adding meaning to medicine
Janet Brandling,William House +1 more