Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review of social prescribing programmes being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service found current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money.Abstract:
Objectives Social prescribing is a way of linking patients in primary care with sources of support within the community to help improve their health and well-being. Social prescribing programmes are being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service and so we conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for their effectiveness. Setting/data sources Nine databases were searched from 2000 to January 2016 for studies conducted in the UK. Relevant reports and guidelines, websites and reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify additional studies. All the searches were restricted to English language only. Participants Systematic reviews and any published evaluation of programmes where patient referral was made from a primary care setting to a link worker or facilitator of social prescribing were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for included studies was undertaken independently by two reviewers and a narrative synthesis was performed. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes of interest were any measures of health and well-being and/or usage of health services. Results We included a total of 15 evaluations of social prescribing programmes. Most were small scale and limited by poor design and reporting. All were rated as a having a high risk of bias. Common design issues included a lack of comparative controls, short follow-up durations, a lack of standardised and validated measuring tools, missing data and a failure to consider potential confounding factors. Despite clear methodological shortcomings, most evaluations presented positive conclusions. Conclusions Social prescribing is being widely advocated and implemented but current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money. If social prescribing is to realise its potential, future evaluations must be comparative by design and consider when, by whom, for whom, how well and at what cost. Trial registration number PROSPERO Registration: CRD42015023501.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Biopsychosocial Functions of Human Walking and Adherence to Behaviourally Demanding Belief Systems: A Narrative Review.
TL;DR: This article examined how pilgrim walking might shape personal, social and transcendental processes, revealing potential mechanisms supporting the body and brain in motion, to how pilgrims might offer policy solutions for physical inactivity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Managing neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia
TL;DR: Evidence of low to moderate quality shows that multidisciplinary care and non-medication interventions are as effective, or more so, than medications for reducing neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI
Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: a realist review
TL;DR: The analysis found that coproduction, alignment, research agency, sequential mixed-methods design and integration of findings all contributed to the development of an acceptable, high-quality social prescribing evaluation design.
Journal ArticleDOI
Does arts engagement and cultural participation impact depression outcomes in adults: a narrative descriptive systematic review of observational studies
Esme Elsden,Brenda Roe +1 more
TL;DR: Emerging evidence that arts and cultural engagement benefits a wider population by reducing depression incidence is found, which is relevant to health-care providers, the general population and policymakers alike.
Book ChapterDOI
Re-naturing the City for Health and Wellbeing: Green/Blue Urban Spaces as Sites of Renewal and Contestation
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the potential negative consequences of human-nature connectivity, using virus transmissions by infected mosquitoes as representative of the challenges of green/blue infrastructure expansion, and discuss implications for social and environmental justice within widely differing global contexts.
References
More filters
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance
TL;DR: The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Daisy Goodman,Daisy Goodman,Paul B. Batalden,Paul B. Batalden,Frank Davidoff,David Stevens +11 more
TL;DR: The development of SQUIRE 2.0 is described, intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
TL;DR: Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report, and there is insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions.
Related Papers (5)
Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes
Social prescribing in general practice: adding meaning to medicine
Janet Brandling,William House +1 more