Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review of social prescribing programmes being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service found current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money.Abstract:
Objectives Social prescribing is a way of linking patients in primary care with sources of support within the community to help improve their health and well-being. Social prescribing programmes are being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service and so we conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for their effectiveness. Setting/data sources Nine databases were searched from 2000 to January 2016 for studies conducted in the UK. Relevant reports and guidelines, websites and reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify additional studies. All the searches were restricted to English language only. Participants Systematic reviews and any published evaluation of programmes where patient referral was made from a primary care setting to a link worker or facilitator of social prescribing were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for included studies was undertaken independently by two reviewers and a narrative synthesis was performed. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes of interest were any measures of health and well-being and/or usage of health services. Results We included a total of 15 evaluations of social prescribing programmes. Most were small scale and limited by poor design and reporting. All were rated as a having a high risk of bias. Common design issues included a lack of comparative controls, short follow-up durations, a lack of standardised and validated measuring tools, missing data and a failure to consider potential confounding factors. Despite clear methodological shortcomings, most evaluations presented positive conclusions. Conclusions Social prescribing is being widely advocated and implemented but current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money. If social prescribing is to realise its potential, future evaluations must be comparative by design and consider when, by whom, for whom, how well and at what cost. Trial registration number PROSPERO Registration: CRD42015023501.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Effectiveness of community interventions for protecting and promoting the mental health of working-age adults experiencing financial uncertainty: a systematic review.
Michael McGrath,F Duncan,Kate Dotsikas,Cleo Baskin,Liam Crosby,Shamini Gnani,Rachael Hunter,Eileen Kaner,James B. Kirkbride,Louise Lafortune,Caroline Lee,Emily J. Oliver,David Osborn,David Osborn,Kate Walters,Jennifer Dykxhoorn +15 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the effectiveness of community interventions for protecting and promoting the mental health of working-age adults in high-income countries during periods of financial insecurity, including financial strain, personal debt, recent job loss and housing insecurity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Increased Wellbeing following Engagement in a Group Nature-Based Programme: The Green Gym Programme Delivered by the Conservation Volunteers
TL;DR: The conservation volunteers' Green Gym as discussed by the authors provides a nature-based environment where participants complete demographics, health characteristics, and the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Short-Form Scale to assess their wellbeing.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment.
Jovana Stojanovic,Markus Wübbeler,Sebastian Geis,Eva Reviriego,Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea,Irene Lenoir-Wijnkoop +5 more
TL;DR: A rather limited involvement of HTA in the evaluation of PH technologies remains extremely rare, and the implementation of collaborative HTA approaches in the setting of PH practice and policy needs to be prioritized and further strengthened.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Needs Resource Connections: A Systematic Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Evaluation.
Anna Steeves-Reece,Annette M Totten,K. D. Broadwell,DA Richardson,Christina Nicolaidis,Melinda M. Davis +5 more
TL;DR: In this article , a taxonomy of quantitative resource connection measures with four categories: whether participants made contact with resources, received resources, had their social needs addressed, or rated some aspect of their experience with resources.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social prescribing for people with complex needs: a realist evaluation
TL;DR: In this article, a realist evaluation of a large social prescribing organization in the North of England was conducted with stakeholders (clients attending Social Prescribing, social prescribing staff and general practice staff).
References
More filters
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance
TL;DR: The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Daisy Goodman,Daisy Goodman,Paul B. Batalden,Paul B. Batalden,Frank Davidoff,David Stevens +11 more
TL;DR: The development of SQUIRE 2.0 is described, intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
TL;DR: Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report, and there is insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions.
Related Papers (5)
Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes
Social prescribing in general practice: adding meaning to medicine
Janet Brandling,William House +1 more