scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Stressor categorization: acute physical and psychological stressors elicit distinctive recruitment patterns in the amygdala and in medullary noradrenergic cell groups.

TLDR
The present data support the suggestion that the brain recognizes at least two major categories of stressor, which the authors have referred to as ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’.
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that the brain categorizes stressors and utilizes neural response pathways that vary in accordance with the assigned category. If this is true, stressors should elicit patterns of neuronal activation within the brain that are category-specific. Data from previous immediate–early gene expression mapping studies have hinted that this is the case, but interstudy differences in methodology render conclusions tenuous. In the present study, immunolabelling for the expression of c-fos was used as a marker of neuronal activity elicited in the rat brain by haemorrhage, immune challenge, noise, restraint and forced swim. All stressors elicited c-fos expression in 25–30% of hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus corticotrophin-releasing-factor cells, suggesting that these stimuli were of comparable strength, at least with regard to their ability to activate the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. In the amygdala, haemorrhage and immune challenge both elicited c-fos expression in a large number of neurons in the central nucleus of the amygdala, whereas noise, restraint and forced swim primarily elicited recruitment of cells within the medial nucleus of the amygdala. In the medulla, all stressors recruited similar numbers of noradrenergic (A1 and A2) and adrenergic (C1 and C2) cells. However, haemorrhage and immune challenge elicited c-fos expression in subpopulations of A1 and A2 noradrenergic cells that were significantly more rostral than those recruited by noise, restraint or forced swim. The present data support the suggestion that the brain recognizes at least two major categories of stressor, which we have referred to as ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’. Moreover, the present data suggest that the neural activation footprint that is left in the brain by stressors can be used to determine the category to which they have been assigned by the brain.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses.

TL;DR: The survival and well-being of all species requires appropriate physiological responses to environmental and homeostatic challenges, so that the respective contributions of the neuroendocrine and autonomic systems are tuned in accordance with stressor modality and intensity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Central mechanisms of stress integration: hierarchical circuitry controlling hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical responsiveness.

TL;DR: The principle extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms responsible for regulating stress-responsive CRH neurons of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, which summate excitatory and inhibitory inputs into a net secretory signal at the pituitary gland, are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress.

TL;DR: The role of the HPA axis in the integration of adaptive responses to stress is discussed and the major neuronal and endocrine systems that contribute to the regulation of theHPA axis and the maintenance of homeostasis in the face of aversive stimuli are identified.
OtherDOI

Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response

TL;DR: Chronic stress-induced activation of the HPA axis takes many forms (chronic basal hypersecretion, sensitized stress responses, and even adrenal exhaustion), with manifestation dependent upon factors such as stressor chronicity, intensity, frequency, and modality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Limbic regulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical function during acute and chronic stress

TL;DR: The data suggest that individual brain regions do not merely function as monolithic activators or inhibitors of the HPA axis and that network approaches need be taken to fully understand the nature of the neuroendocrine stress response.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Neurocircuitry of stress: central control of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenocortical axis

TL;DR: The functional and neuroanatomical data obtained suggest that disease processes involving inappropriate stress control involve dysfunction of processive stress pathways.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organization of Ovine Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Immunoreactive Cells and Fibers in the Rat Brain: An Immunohistochemical Study

TL;DR: The results suggest that the PVH plays a critical role in the modulation of ACTH and beta-endorphin release from the pituitary, and that CRF-containing pathways in the brain are involved in the mediation of autonomic responses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pattern and time course of immediate early gene expression in rat brain following acute stress.

TL;DR: The present results reveal a widespread pattern of neuronal activation in response to acute swim or restraint stress that may aid in the identification of stress-specific neural circuits and are likely to have important implications for the understanding of neuronal regulation of the stress response.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anatomical specificity of noradrenergic inputs to the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the rat hypothalamus

TL;DR: The results suggest that each of the three brainstem noradrenergic cell groups that contribute to the innervation of the PVH and/or the SO is in a position to modulate the activity of anatomically and chemically distinct groups of neurosecretory neurons.
Journal ArticleDOI

c-Fos as a transcription factor: a stressful (re)view from a functional map

TL;DR: This article summarizes the achievements that have been accumulated about the role of c-Fos as a transcription factor and as a functional marker of activated neurons and focuses on recent functional data on c-fos as transcription factor.
Related Papers (5)