scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery.

TLDR
The aim of this review was to determine whether virtual reality (VR) training can supplement and/or replace conventional laparoscopic training in surgical trainees with limited or no Laparoscopic experience.
Abstract
Background: Surgical training has traditionally been one of apprenticeship. The aim of this review was to determine whether virtual reality (VR) training can supplement and/or replace conventional laparoscopic training in surgical trainees with limited or no laparoscopic experience. Methods: Randomized clinical trials addressing this issue were identified from The Cochrane Library trials register, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, grey literature and reference lists. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95 per cent confidence intervals based on available case analysis. Results: Twenty-three trials (mostly with a high risk of bias) involving 622 participants were included in this review. In trainees without surgical experience, VR training decreased the time taken to complete a task, increased accuracy and decreased errors compared with no training. In the same participants, VR training was more accurate than video trainer (VT) training. In participants with limited laparoscopic experience, VR training resulted in a greater reduction in operating time, error and unnecessary movements than standard laparoscopic training. In these participants, the composite performance score was better in the VR group than the VT group. Conclusion: VR training can supplement standard laparoscopic surgical training. It is at least as effective as video training in supplementing standard laparoscopic training.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward technology-supported surgical training: the potential of virtual simulators in laparoscopic surgery.

TL;DR: This review assesses the role of virtual reality (VR) simulators in laparoscopic surgery and their actual impact on technical skills and concludes that training out of the operating room on virtual reality simulators has demonstrated its positive impact on basic skills during real Laparoscopic procedures in patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of open inguinal hernia repair simulation model: a randomized controlled educational trial

TL;DR: The interactive simulation has shown an objective benefit in teaching medical students the anatomical and procedural knowledge in performing an open inguinal hernia repair.
Journal ArticleDOI

Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation

TL;DR: This study evaluated a novel LS-CAT performance tool, comprising of four tasks, which demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability and has a potential for wider use to objectively assess laparoscopic suturing skills.
Journal ArticleDOI

Digital Learning Resources for Prosthodontic Education: The Perspectives of a Long-Term Dental Educator Regarding 4 Key Factors

TL;DR: There are 4 key factors that can enhance student education (spatial ability, interactivity, critical thinking, and clinical correlations with integration of multiple dental disciplines) that can be incorporated into student learning through the use of 3D education programs in class.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment of Procedural Skills Using Virtual Simulation Remains a Challenge

TL;DR: Only the full procedure of the LAP Mentor procedural simulator has enough discriminative power to claim construct validity, and the lack of quality control makes it currently unsuited for the assessment of procedural laparoscopic skills.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials*

TL;DR: This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses

TL;DR: Study of low methodological quality in which the estimate of quality is incorporated into the meta-analyses can alter the interpretation of the benefit of intervention, whether a scale or component approach is used in the assessment of trial quality.
Related Papers (5)