scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review

TLDR
It is concluded that screening reduces breast cancer mortality but that some overdiagnosis occurs, and results from observational studies support the occurrence of over Diagnosis, but estimates of its magnitude are unreliable.
About
This article is published in The Lancet.The article was published on 2012-11-17 and is currently open access. It has received 1451 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Overdiagnosis & Breast cancer screening.

read more

Figures
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

TL;DR: The GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as mentioned in this paper show that female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung cancer, colorectal (11 4.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%) and female breast (6.9%), and cervical cancer (5.6%) cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

TL;DR: This work presents the results of a meta-analysis conducted at the 2016 European Oncology and Radiotherapy Guidelines Working Group (ESMO) workshop on breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis of women with atypical central giant cell granuloma (CGM) who have previously had surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

TL;DR: It is found that breast cancer mortality was an unreliable outcome that was biased in favour of screening, mainly because of differential misclassification of cause of death.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

TL;DR: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the benefits and harms of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a primary screening method for breast cancer.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

TL;DR: It is found that variations in local treatment that substantially affect the risk of locoregional recurrence could also affect long-term breast cancer mortality, and that avoidance of a local recurrence in the conserved breast is recommended.
Journal ArticleDOI

Overdiagnosis in Cancer

TL;DR: The two prerequisites for cancer overdiagnosis to occur are described: the existence of a silent disease reservoir and activities leading to its detection (particularly cancer screening), and the magnitude of over diagnosis from randomized trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

TL;DR: Increasing body mass index is associated with a significant increase in the risk of cancer for 10 out of 17 specific types examined, and for colorectal cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, and endometrial cancer, the effect ofBody mass index on risk differed significantly according to menopausal status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.

TL;DR: The 587 interventions identified ranged from those that save more resources than they cost, to those costing more than 10 billion dollars per year of life saved, with the median intervention costing $42,000 per life-year saved.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (15)
Q1. What are the contributions in "The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review" ?

The Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening this paper concluded that women should be aware that screening carries a risk of detecting cancers, invasive and 

The panel ’ s review of the randomised trials of breast screening leads to the following recommendations about future research priorities: The panel ’ s review of overdiagnosis leads to their support for further research into DCIS, in particular: A proposed study to examine the need for treatment of lowgrade DCIS Continued support for the Sloane project, which has an extensive database of screen-detected cases of DCIS, and the long-term follow-up of these cases may well improve their understanding of this condition ( The Sloane Project 2010, 2011 ). 

Of the B307 000 women aged 50–52 who are invited to screening each year, just 41% would have an overdiagnosed cancer during the next 20 years. 

Estimates from trials of shorter duration suggest overdiagnosis of about 11% as a proportion of breast cancer incidence during the screening period and for the remainder of the woman’s lifetime, or equivalently about 19% as a proportion of cancers diagnosed during the screening period. 

The greater the proportion of women who accept the invitation to be screened, the greater is the benefit to the public health in terms of reduction in mortality from breast cancer. 

The frequency of overdiagnosis was of the order of 11% from a population perspective, and about 19% from the perspective of a woman invited to screening. 

The panel’s best estimate is that the breast screening programmes in the United Kingdom, inviting women aged 50–70 every 3 years, prevent about 1300 breast cancer deaths a year, a most welcome benefit to women and to the public health. 

The panel’s review of the evidence on benefit – the older RCTs, and those more recent observational studies – points to a 20% reduction in mortality in women invited to screening. 

One method that has been used is investigation of time trends in incidence rates of breast cancer for different age groups over the period that population screening was introduced. 

for 10 000 women invited to screening, from age 50 for 20 years, it is estimated that 681 cancers (invasive and DCIS)2206 www.bjcancer.com |DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.177will be diagnosed, of which 129 will represent overdiagnosis (using the 19% estimate of overdiagnosis) and 43 deaths from breast cancer will be prevented. 

The appropriate measure of benefit, therefore, is reduction in mortality from breast cancer in women offered screening compared with women not offered screening. 

For the UK screening programmes, this currently corresponds to about 1300 deaths from breast cancer being prevented each year, or equivalently about 22 000 years of life being saved. 

This yielded the estimate that for every 235 women invited to screening, one breast cancer death would be prevented; correspondingly 180 women would need to be screened to prevent one breast cancer death. 

This corresponds to one breast cancer death averted for every 235 women invited to screening for 20 years, and one death averted for every 180 women who attend screening. 

Putting together benefit and overdiagnosis from the above figures, the panel estimates that for 10 000 UK women invited to screening from age 50 for 20 years, about 681 cancers will be found of which 129 will represent overdiagnosis, and 43 deaths from breast cancer will be prevented. 

Trending Questions (1)
What are the theories about the benefits of kangkong?

The given text does not provide any information about the benefits of kangkong.