scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review and random‐effects meta‐analysis to assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID‐19 patients found no significant differences in the prevalence estimates between different genders; however, the depression and anxiety prevalence estimates varied based on different screening tools.
Abstract
Evidence from previous coronavirus outbreaks has shown that infected patients are at risk for developing psychiatric and mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. To construct a comprehensive picture of the mental health status in COVID-19 patients, we conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in this population. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Wanfang Data, Wangfang Med Online, CNKI, and CQVIP for relevant articles, and we included 31 studies (n = 5153) in our analyses. We found that the pooled prevalence of depression was 45% (95% CI: 37-54%, I2  = 96%), the pooled prevalence of anxiety was 47% (95% CI: 37-57%, I2  = 97%), and the pooled prevalence of sleeping disturbances was 34% (95% CI: 19-50%, I2  = 98%). We did not find any significant differences in the prevalence estimates between different genders; however, the depression and anxiety prevalence estimates varied based on different screening tools. More observational studies assessing the mental wellness of COVID-19 outpatients and COVID-19 patients from countries other than China are needed to further examine the psychological implications of COVID-19 infections.

read more

Citations
More filters

Meta-analysis of prevalence

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present methods for the meta-analysis of prevalence of multiple sclerosis using logit and double arcsine transformations to stabilise the variance and propose solutions to the problems that arise.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic and found that higher infection risk, living in hard-hit areas, having pre-existing physical or mental conditions, and longer media exposure were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depression.
Journal ArticleDOI

The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic search of English and Chinese databases was conducted to assess the prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbances in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

TL;DR: In this article , a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the extent of sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic and found that four in every ten individuals reported a sleep problem during the outbreak.
Journal ArticleDOI

Female Sex Is a Risk Factor Associated with Long-Term Post-COVID Related-Symptoms but Not with COVID-19 Symptoms: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM Multicenter Study

TL;DR: Female sex was a risk factor for the development of some long-term post-COVID symptoms including mood disorders and healthcare systems should consider sex differences in the management of long haulers.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

TL;DR: A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

TL;DR: In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity, which makes it a useful clinical and research tool.
Related Papers (5)