scispace - formally typeset
BookDOI

The Semantic Web: Research and Applications

TLDR
DODDLE-R, a support environment for user-centered ontology development, consists of two main parts: pre-processing part and quality improvement part, which generates a prototype ontology semi-automatically and supports the refinement of it interactively.
Abstract
In order to realize the on-the-fly ontology construction for the Semantic Web, this paper proposes DODDLE-R, a support environment for user-centered ontology development. It consists of two main parts: pre-processing part and quality improvement part. Pre-processing part generates a prototype ontology semi-automatically, and quality improvement part supports the refinement of it interactively. As we believe that careful construction of ontologies from preliminary phase is more efficient than attempting generate ontologies full-automatically (it may cause too many modification by hand), quality improvement part plays significant role in DODDLE-R. Through interactive support for improving the quality of prototype ontology, OWL-Lite level ontology, which consists of taxonomic relationships (class sub class relationship) and non-taxonomic relationships (defined as property), is constructed effi-

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

A survey of schema-based matching approaches

TL;DR: This paper presents a new classification of schema-based matching techniques that builds on the top of state of the art in both schema and ontology matching and distinguishes between approximate and exact techniques at schema-level; and syntactic, semantic, and external techniques at element- and structure-level.
Journal ArticleDOI

YAGO2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia

TL;DR: YAGO2 as mentioned in this paper is an extension of the YAGO knowledge base, in which entities, facts, and events are anchored in both time and space, and it contains 447 million facts about 9.8 million entities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recommender system application developments

TL;DR: This paper reviews up-to-date application developments of recommender systems, clusters their applications into eight main categories, and summarizes the related recommendation techniques used in each category.
Book ChapterDOI

LogMap: logic-based and scalable ontology matching

TL;DR: This paper presents LogMap--a highly scalable ontology matching system with 'built-in' reasoning and diagnosis capabilities, and is the only matching system that can deal with semantically rich ontologies containing tens (and even hundreds of thousands of classes).
Book ChapterDOI

A string metric for ontology alignment

TL;DR: A new string metric for the comparison of names which performs better on the process of ontology alignment as well as to many other field matching problems is presented.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowledge processes and ontologies

TL;DR: An approach for ontology-based knowledge management (KM) that includes a tool suite and a methodology for developing ontological-based KM systems is presented, illustrated by CHAR (Corporate History AnalyzeR), a KM system for corporate history analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean

TL;DR: Explosing common misuses of the subsumption relationship and the formal basis for why they are wrong and how to stop them.
Journal ArticleDOI

The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping

TL;DR: A suite of tools for managing multiple ontologies provides users with a uniform framework for comparing, aligning, and merging ontologies, maintaining versions, translating between different formalisms, and identifying inconsistencies and potential problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution

TL;DR: Differences between database-schema evolution and ontology evolution will allow us to build on the extensive research in schema evolution, but there are also important differences between database schemas and ontologies.
Book ChapterDOI

User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management

TL;DR: This paper identifies a possible six-phase evolution process and introduces the concept of an evolution strategy encapsulating policy for evolution with respect to user?s requirements, focusing on providing the user with capabilities to control and customize it.