scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The recognition that contrast enhancement is nonspecific and may not always be a true surrogate of tumor response and the need to account for the nonenhancing component of the tumor mandate that new criteria be developed and validated to permit accurate assessment of the efficacy of novel therapies.
Abstract
Currently, the most widely used criteria for assessing response to therapy in high-grade gliomas are based on two-dimensional tumor measurements on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in conjunction with clinical assessment and corticosteroid dose (the Macdonald Criteria). It is increasingly apparent that there are significant limitations to these criteria, which only address the contrast-enhancing component of the tumor. For example, chemoradiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastomas results in transient increase in tumor enhancement (pseudoprogression) in 20% to 30% of patients, which is difficult to differentiate from true tumor progression. Antiangiogenic agents produce high radiographic response rates, as defined by a rapid decrease in contrast enhancement on CT/MRI that occurs within days of initiation of treatment and that is partly a result of reduced vascular permeability to contrast agents rather than a true antitumor effect. In addition, a subset of patients treated with antiangiogenic agents develop tumor recurrence characterized by an increase in the nonenhancing component depicted on T2-weighted/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences. The recognition that contrast enhancement is nonspecific and may not always be a true surrogate of tumor response and the need to account for the nonenhancing component of the tumor mandate that new criteria be developed and validated to permit accurate assessment of the efficacy of novel therapies. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group is an international effort to develop new standardized response criteria for clinical trials in brain tumors. In this proposal, we present the recommendations for updated response criteria for high-grade gliomas.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An Examination of the Role of Supramaximal Resection of Temporal Lobe Glioblastoma Multiforme.

TL;DR: Achieving SMR substantially improved survival in patients with temporal lobe GBM compared with GTR of the enhancement alone, and the complication rates did not differ among the resection groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical outcome assessment in malignant glioma trials: measuring signs, symptoms, and functional limitations.

TL;DR: The properties of various COA measures used in malignant glioma clinical trials to date are examined and cross references their content to the priority signs, symptoms, and functional limitations defined through a community survey conducted by the National Brain Tumor Society.
Book ChapterDOI

Integrated Spatio-Temporal Segmentation of Longitudinal Brain Tumor Imaging Studies

TL;DR: An integrated 4D spatio-temporal brain tumor segmentation method is proposed, which combines supervised classification with conditional random field regularization in an energy minimization scheme and is a good candidate for standard clinical use.
Journal ArticleDOI

Monitoring radiographic brain tumor progression.

TL;DR: The different criteria used to detect tumor progression are reviewed, and the inherent challenges with detection of progression are highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-invasive assessment of intratumoral vascularity using arterial spin labeling: A comparison to susceptibility-weighted imaging for the differentiation of primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma

TL;DR: Findings indicate that nVITS values have a comparable diagnostic accuracy to ITSS values in differentiating glioblastoma and PCNSL, offering a completely non-invasive and fast assessment of tumoral vascularity in a clinical setting.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors

TL;DR: A model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment is proposed, which is largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reporting results of cancer treatment.

TL;DR: Recommendations have been developed for standardized approaches to the recording of baseline data relating to the patient, the tumor, laboratory and radiologic data, the reporting of treatment, grading of acute and subacute toxicity, reporting of response, recurrence and disease‐free interval, and reporting results of therapy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Malignant Gliomas in Adults

TL;DR: The authors found that approximately 5% of patients with malignant gliomas have a family history of glioma and most of these familial cases are associated with rare genetic syndromes, such as neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, the Li−Fraumeni syndrome (germ-line p53 mutations associated with an increased risk of several cancers), and Turcot's syndrome (intestinal polyposis and brain tumors).
Related Papers (5)