scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Federal Reserve System

OtherWashington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
About: Federal Reserve System is a other organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Monetary policy & Inflation. The organization has 2373 authors who have published 10301 publications receiving 511979 citations.


Papers
More filters
Posted Content
TL;DR: The distinction between the timeless perspective and discretionary modes of monetary policymaking, the former representing rule-based policy as recently formalized by Woodford (1999b), was discussed in this paper.
Abstract: This paper reviews the distinction between the timeless perspective and discretionary modes of monetary policymaking, the former representing rule-based policy as recently formalized by Woodford (1999b). In models with forward-looking expectations, this distinction is greater than in the models that have been typical in the rules-vs.-discretion literature; typically there is a second inefficiency from discretionary policymaking, distinct from the familiar inflationary bias. The paper presents calculations of the quantitative magnitude of this second inefficiency, using calibrated models of two types prominent in the current literature. In addition, it examines the distinction between instrument rules and targeting rules; the results indicate that targeting-rule outcomes can be very closely approximated by instrument rules. Also included is a brief investigation of operationality issues, involving the unobservability of current output and the possibility that an incorrect concept of the natural-rate level of output, essential in measuring the output gap, is used by the policymaker. In all of the cases examined, the unconditional average performance of timeless perspective policymaking is at least as good as that provided by optimal discretionary behavior.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined the relationship between product market competition and employment discrimination using an especially constructed data set that links microeconomic data on female employment with measures of market concentration in the banking industry and found that individual market shares are unrelated to female employment, suggesting that the relationship is due primarily to differences across markets rather than individual firms.
Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between product market competition and employment discrimination using an especially constructed data set that links microeconomic data on female employment with measures of market concentration in the banking industry. The use of firm-specific data drawn from this one industry allows estimation of this relationship in a manner that avoids the problems of interindustry differences that have troubled previous studies. The results provide strong support for a negative relationship between market concentration and the relative employment of women. Further, we find that individual market shares are unrelated to female employment, suggesting that the relationship is due primarily to differences across markets rather than individual firms.

172 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The authors argue that discretionary monetary policy exposes the economy to welfare-decreasing instability by creating the potential for private expectations about the response of monetary policy to exogenous shocks to be self-fulfilling.
Abstract: We argue that discretionary monetary policy exposes the economy to welfare-decreasing instability. It does so by creating the potential for private expectations about the response of monetary policy to exogenous shocks to be self-fulfilling. Among the many equilibria that are possible, some have good welfare properties. But others exhibit welfare-decreasing volatility in output and employment. We refer to the latter type of equilibria as expectation traps. In effect, our paper presents a new argument for commitment in monetary policy because commitment eliminates these bad equilibria. We show that full commitment is not necessary to achieve the best outcome, and that more limited forms of commitment suffice.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper used over 100 years of data to estimate the contribution of various shocks to explaining variation in the real pound-dollar rate, and found that monetary shocks are unimportant compared to other types of shocks.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper showed that cross-border consolidation of financial institutions within Europe has been relatively limited, possibly reflecting efficiency barriers to operating across borders, including distance; differences in language, culture, currency, and regulatory/supervisory structures; and explicit or implicit rules against foreign competitors.
Abstract: Cross-border consolidation of financial institutions within Europe has been relatively limited, possibly reflecting efficiency barriers to operating across borders, including distance; differences in language, culture, currency, and regulatory/supervisory structures; and explicit or implicit rules against foreign competitors. EU policies such as the Single Market Programme and European Monetary Union attenuate some but not all of these barriers. The evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that these barriers offset most of any potential efficiency gains from cross-border consolidation. Banks headquartered in other EU nations have slightly lower average measured efficiency than domestic banks and non-EU-based foreign banks.

171 citations


Authors

Showing all 2412 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Ross Levine122398108067
Francis X. Diebold11036874723
Kenneth Rogoff10739075971
Allen N. Berger10638265596
Frederic S. Mishkin10037234898
Thomas J. Sargent9637039224
Ben S. Bernanke9644676378
Stijn Claessens9646242743
Andrew K. Rose8837442605
Martin Eichenbaum8723437611
Lawrence J. Christiano8525337734
Jie Yang7853220004
James P. Smith7837223013
Glenn D. Rudebusch7322622035
Edward C. Prescott7223555508
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Center for Economic and Policy Research
4.4K papers, 272K citations

93% related

National Bureau of Economic Research
34.1K papers, 2.8M citations

93% related

Federal Reserve Bank of New York
2.6K papers, 156.1K citations

93% related

European Central Bank
4.7K papers, 231.8K citations

92% related

International Monetary Fund
20.1K papers, 737.5K citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202317
202247
2021304
2020448
2019356
2018316