scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Scottish Association for Marine Science

FacilityOban, United Kingdom
About: Scottish Association for Marine Science is a facility organization based out in Oban, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Sea ice & Benthic zone. The organization has 524 authors who have published 1765 publications receiving 70783 citations. The organization is also known as: SAMS & Scottish Marine Station for Scientific Research.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is determined that both positive and negative perceptions of aquaculture are held by the European general public and that they are influenced by a variety of geographic and demographic traits.

42 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, Latitudinal variability in export fluxes and efficiencies (ThE) of calcite, opal, and particulate organic carbon (POC) were examined during a basin-scale Atlantic Ocean cruise.
Abstract: Latitudinal variability in export fluxes and efficiencies (ThE) of calcite, opal, and particulate organic carbon (POC) were examined during a basin-scale Atlantic Ocean cruise. A clear relationship between integrated euphotic zone POC and calcite export combined with similarities in average ThE for calcite (0.26), opal (0.31), and POC (0.29) implies a potential association between biomineral and POC export. However, such similarity conceals substantial uncorrelated variability when ThE values are compared on regional scales, with ThE of POC often being much higher than that of calcite or opal. High-euphotic zone ThE for POC (0.3–0.4) relative to that found in deep sea sediment traps (<0.05) suggests that considerable remineralization occurs below the euphotic zone. We suggest (1) that regional variability in the mechanisms by which biominerals and POC become associated are more important in determining the efficient export of organic carbon than that of ballast materials; and (2) that, because of the preferential remineralization of POC relative to calcite/opal dissolution during subeuphotic processes, the potential for effective ballasting increases with depth in the water column.

42 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results suggest that the rise in the grey seal population over recent years has not led to the decline in gadoid stocks; there is insufficient bycatch by the Nephrops fleet to have a large impact on gadoid firms; however, fishing, as a key driver of the west of Scotland shelf ecosystem, has impacted stocks and by decreasing levels to maximum sustainable yield cod biomass may increase slightly though not returning to previous levels.
Abstract: Abundance and biomass of cod, haddock, and whiting in the waters off of the west coast of Scotland (wcoS) have undergone large changes in recent years, most notably a recent decline. These three species contribute a considerable part of Scottish demersal landings from this area and as such it is important to understand why these stocks are behaving the way they are. A number of explanations for the decline have been proposed, including: seal predation, pressure from Nephrops trawls, and fishing pressure more generally. We used an ecosystem model of the wcoS continental shelf (,200 m depth) to investigate whether these proposed explanations for declining gadoid stocks are feasible. Results suggest that the rise in the grey seal population over recent years has not led to the decline in gadoid stocks; there is insufficient bycatch by the Nephrops fleet to have a large impact on gadoid stocks; however, fishing, as a key driver of the west of Scotland shelf ecosystem, has impacted stocks and by decreasing fishing levels to maximum sustainable yield cod biomass may increase slightly though not returning to previous levels. Although this means we are little further forward in understanding the cause of recent gadoid declines in the area, the development of this model has enabled us to further our knowledge and understanding of aspects of trophic structure and the impacts of fishing on the wcoS.

42 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 2008
TL;DR: There are many types of biological resource centers (BRCs), which vary both in the kinds of material they hold and in their functional role as discussed by the authors. But all BRCs are expected to provide materials and information of an appropriate quality for their intended use and work to standards relevant to those applications.
Abstract: Biobanks, more formally known as biological resource centers (BRCs), form an “unsung” yet critical component of the infrastructures for scientific research, industry and conservation, without which much of the current scientific activity involving microbial cultures and cell-lines would be effectively impossible. BRCs are de facto depositories of “biological standards” holding taxonomic and other reference strains on which much of the associated published science and industrial standards are built and upon which some significant international commercial and ethical issues rely. The establishment and maintenance of BRCs is a knowledge- and skill-rich activity that in particular requires careful attention to the implementation of reliable preservation technologies and appropriate quality assurance to ensure that recovered cultures and other biological materials perform in the same way as the originally isolated culture or material. There are many types of BRC, which vary both in the kinds of material they hold and in their functional role. All BRCs are expected to provide materials and information of an appropriate quality for their intended use and work to standards relevant to those applications. There are important industrial, biomedical, and conservation issues that can only be addressed through effective and efficient operation of BRCs in the long term. This requires a high degree of expertise in the maintenance and management of collections of biological materials at ultra-low temperatures, or as freeze-dried material, to secure their long-term integrity and relevance for future research, development, and conservation.

42 citations


Authors

Showing all 534 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David H. Green9228830311
Ronnie N. Glud6922813615
Harald Schwalbe6648416243
Michael P. Meredith5823413381
Michael T. Burrows5520512902
Gabriele M. König5530710374
Peter Wadhams532198095
Mikhail V. Zubkov501307781
Wolfram Meyer-Klaucke471427560
Gurvan Michel461108416
Paul Tett461506585
Carl J. Carrano462047501
Frithjof C. Küpper451437528
Geraint A. Tarling441716047
Christopher J. S. Bolch411055599
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
IFREMER
12.3K papers, 468.8K citations

93% related

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
10.7K papers, 499.6K citations

93% related

National Marine Fisheries Service
7K papers, 305K citations

91% related

Natural Environment Research Council
4.2K papers, 254.5K citations

90% related

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
18.3K papers, 1.2M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20235
202219
2021128
2020151
201985
201896