Institution
Universidad de Morón
Education•Morón, Argentina•
About: Universidad de Morón is a education organization based out in Morón, Argentina. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Nicotinic agonist & Bioavailability. The organization has 183 authors who have published 284 publications receiving 4238 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidad de Moron.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Oxford1, Green Templeton College2, The Aga Khan University Hospital3, University of California, Berkeley4, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute5, University of Milan6, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico7, University of Brescia8, Federal University of Maranhão9, Boston Children's Hospital10, Brigham and Women's Hospital11, University of Paris12, Airlangga University13, Tufts Medical Center14, Northwestern University15, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust16, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust17, University of Washington18, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University19, Memorial Hospital of South Bend20, Bayero University Kano21, University of Ibadan22, University College Hospital, Ibadan23, University of Bordeaux24, Gombe State university25, University of Pavia26, Institute for Social Security and Services for State Workers27, University of Calabar28, Tanta University29, Keio University30, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University31, University of Buenos Aires32, Universidad de Morón33, Harvard University34
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the risks associated with COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with not-infected, concomitant pregnant individuals.
Abstract: Importance Detailed information about the association of COVID-19 with outcomes in pregnant individuals compared with not-infected pregnant individuals is much needed. Objective To evaluate the risks associated with COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with not-infected, concomitant pregnant individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cohort study that took place from March to October 2020, involving 43 institutions in 18 countries, 2 unmatched, consecutive, not-infected women were concomitantly enrolled immediately after each infected woman was identified, at any stage of pregnancy or delivery, and at the same level of care to minimize bias. Women and neonates were followed up until hospital discharge. Exposures COVID-19 in pregnancy determined by laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 and/or radiological pulmonary findings or 2 or more predefined COVID-19 symptoms. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measures were indices of (maternal and severe neonatal/perinatal) morbidity and mortality; the individual components of these indices were secondary outcomes. Models for these outcomes were adjusted for country, month entering study, maternal age, and history of morbidity. Results A total of 706 pregnant women with COVID-19 diagnosis and 1424 pregnant women without COVID-19 diagnosis were enrolled, all with broadly similar demographic characteristics (mean [SD] age, 30.2 [6.1] years). Overweight early in pregnancy occurred in 323 women (48.6%) with COVID-19 diagnosis and 554 women (40.2%) without. Women with COVID-19 diagnosis were at higher risk for preeclampsia/eclampsia (relative risk [RR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.27-2.43), severe infections (RR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.63-7.01), intensive care unit admission (RR, 5.04; 95% CI, 3.13-8.10), maternal mortality (RR, 22.3; 95% CI, 2.88-172), preterm birth (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.30-1.94), medically indicated preterm birth (RR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.56-2.51), severe neonatal morbidity index (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.69-4.18), and severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.66-2.75). Fever and shortness of breath for any duration was associated with increased risk of severe maternal complications (RR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.92-3.40) and neonatal complications (RR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.11-11.69). Asymptomatic women with COVID-19 diagnosis remained at higher risk only for maternal morbidity (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00-1.54) and preeclampsia (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.63). Among women who tested positive (98.1% by real-time polymerase chain reaction), 54 (13%) of their neonates tested positive. Cesarean delivery (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.18-3.91) but not breastfeeding (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.66-1.85) was associated with increased risk for neonatal test positivity. Conclusions and Relevance In this multinational cohort study, COVID-19 in pregnancy was associated with consistent and substantial increases in severe maternal morbidity and mortality and neonatal complications when pregnant women with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were compared. The findings should alert pregnant individuals and clinicians to implement strictly all the recommended COVID-19 preventive measures.
702 citations
••
University of Tehran1, Université de Montréal2, New Mexico State University3, Royal Botanic Gardens4, State University of Feira de Santana5, State University of Campinas6, University of the Western Cape7, Federal University of São Carlos8, University of Melbourne9, Federal University of Bahia10, National Taiwan University11, Australian National University12, Complutense University of Madrid13, National Autonomous University of Mexico14, Cornell University15, Université libre de Bruxelles16, National Museum of Natural History17, University of Oxford18, Sao Paulo State University19, Universidad de Morón20, Federal University of Western Bahia21, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh22, University of Reading23, University of Zurich24, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul25, Kyushu University26, University of South Africa27, Tarbiat Modares University28, Montana State University29, University of Johannesburg30, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro31, University of Angers32, National Science Foundation33, Missouri Botanical Garden34, National University of Rosario35, University of Arizona36, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte37, Universidade Federal de Goiás38, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária39, University of Dundee40, Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus41, Arizona State University42, University of Cape Town43, New York Botanical Garden44, Naturalis45, Heidelberg University46, Chinese Academy of Sciences47
TL;DR: The classification of the legume family proposed here addresses the long-known non-monophyly of the traditionally recognised subfamily Caesalpinioideae, by recognising six robustly supported monophyletic subfamilies and reflects the phylogenetic structure that is consistently resolved.
Abstract: The classification of the legume family proposed here addresses the long-known non-monophyly of the traditionally recognised subfamily Caesalpinioideae, by recognising six robustly supported monophyletic subfamilies. This new classification uses as its framework the most comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of legumes to date, based on plastid matK gene sequences, and including near-complete sampling of genera (698 of the currently recognised 765 genera) and ca. 20% (3696) of known species. The matK gene region has been the most widely sequenced across the legumes, and in most legume lineages, this gene region is sufficiently variable to yield well-supported clades. This analysis resolves the same major clades as in other phylogenies of whole plastid and nuclear gene sets (with much sparser taxon sampling). Our analysis improves upon previous studies that have used large phylogenies of the Leguminosae for addressing evolutionary questions, because it maximises generic sampling and provides a phylogenetic tree that is based on a fully curated set of sequences that are vouchered and taxonomically validated. The phylogenetic trees obtained and the underlying data are available to browse and download, facilitating subsequent analyses that require evolutionary trees. Here we propose a new community-endorsed classification of the family that reflects the phylogenetic structure that is consistently resolved and recognises six subfamilies in Leguminosae: a recircumscribed Caesalpinioideae DC., Cercidoideae Legume Phylogeny Working Group (stat. nov.), Detarioideae Burmeist., Dialioideae Legume Phylogeny Working Group (stat. nov.), Duparquetioideae Legume Phylogeny Working Group (stat. nov.), and Papilionoideae DC. The traditionally recognised subfamily Mimosoideae is a distinct clade nested within the recircumscribed Caesalpinioideae and is referred to informally as the mimosoid clade pending a forthcoming formal tribal and/or cladebased classification of the new Caesalpinioideae. We provide a key for subfamily identification, descriptions with diagnostic charactertistics for the subfamilies, figures illustrating their floral and fruit diversity, and lists of genera by subfamily. This new classification of Leguminosae represents a consensus view of the international legume systematics community; it invokes both compromise and practicality of use.
697 citations
••
TL;DR: This work compiles past and present information about the role of zinc in human health and concludes that zinc deficiency is a world nutritional problem.
348 citations
••
TL;DR: This review concerns the importance of zinc in growth, development, and cognitive function in children and the deleterious consequences of its deficiency on children's health.
270 citations
••
TL;DR: The implications of incorporating natural antioxidants into fresh beef, focusing on the benefits of feeding cattle good quality pasture, are reviewed, with Argentina having a natural advantage in producing meat with a high antioxidant value.
243 citations
Authors
Showing all 184 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Diego A. Golombek | 40 | 177 | 5725 |
Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje | 28 | 523 | 6619 |
Monica Florin-Christensen | 25 | 97 | 2160 |
Ricardo Weill | 21 | 41 | 1777 |
Diego C. Fernandez | 19 | 37 | 1386 |
Roberto J. Aguerre | 19 | 38 | 920 |
Sergio Ramon Vaudagna | 17 | 45 | 847 |
Gabriela Maria Grigioni | 17 | 42 | 775 |
Ana Maria Sancho | 16 | 43 | 1251 |
Fernando Pablo Landini | 16 | 65 | 563 |
Leonhard Schnittger | 16 | 57 | 640 |
Adriana Maria Descalzo | 16 | 38 | 1230 |
Marcelo O. Ortells | 15 | 36 | 1326 |
Maria del Carmen Vila | 14 | 32 | 495 |
Jorge M. Affanni | 14 | 52 | 716 |