scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis of the Swimming of Microscopic Organisms

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor
- 22 Nov 1951 - 
- Vol. 209, Iss: 1099, pp 447-461
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, it was shown that if the waves down neighbouring tails are in phase, very much less energy is dissipated in the fluid between them than when the waves are in opposite phase.
Abstract
Large objects which propel themselves in air or water make use of inertia in the surrounding fluid. The propulsive organ pushes the fluid backwards, while the resistance of the body gives the fluid a forward momentum. The forward and backward momenta exactly balance, but the propulsive organ and the resistance can be thought about as acting separately. This conception cannot be transferred to problems of propulsion in microscopic bodies for which the stresses due to viscosity may be many thousands of times as great as those due to inertia. No case of self-propulsion in a viscous fluid due to purely viscous forces seems to have been discussed. The motion of a fluid near a sheet down which waves of lateral displacement are propagated is described. It is found that the sheet moves forwards at a rate 2π 2 b 2 /λ 2 times the velocity of propagation of the waves. Here b is the amplitude and λ the wave-length. This analysis seems to explain how a propulsive tail can move a body through a viscous fluid without relying on reaction due to inertia. The energy dissipation and stress in the tail are also calculated. The work is extended to explore the reaction between the tails of two neighbouring small organisms with propulsive tails. It is found that if the waves down neighbouring tails are in phase very much less energy is dissipated in the fluid between them than when the waves are in opposite phase. It is also found that when the phase of the wave in one tail lags behind that in the other there is a strong reaction, due to the viscous stress in the fluid between them, which tends to force the two wave trains into phase. It is in fact observed that the tails of spermatozoa wave in unison when they are close to one another and pointing the same way.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A porous prolate-spheroidal model for ciliated micro-organisms

TL;DR: In this paper, a fluid-mechanical model is developed for representing the mechanism of propulsion of a finite ciliated micro-organism having a prolate-spheroidal shape.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of solid boundaries on swimming dynamics of microorganisms in a viscoelastic fluid

TL;DR: It is found that the viscoelasticity strongly affects the near-wall motion of a squirmer by generating an opposing polymeric torque which impedes the rotation of the swimmer away from the wall.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hydrodynamics Versus Intracellular Coupling in the Synchronization of Eukaryotic Flagella

TL;DR: The results suggest that synchronization is due instead to coupling through cell internal fibers connecting the flagella, and this conclusion is confirmed by observations of the vfl3 mutant, with impaired mechanical connection between theFlagella.
Book ChapterDOI

Problems and progress in microswimming

TL;DR: The speeds of organisms moving by propagating small amplitude waves are estimated, the influx of nonlinear control theory and subriemannian geometry is advocated, and open questions motivated by biology are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Geometric Swimming at Low and High Reynolds Numbers

TL;DR: This work extends the benefits of the optimal-coordinate approach to the analysis of swimming at the extremes of low and high Reynolds numbers to help understand the displacement of swimming three-link systems over strokes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sea-urchin spermatozoa.

Lord Rothschild
- 01 Feb 1951 - 
TL;DR: The head of the sea‐urchin spermatozoon is pear‐shaped and axially symmetrical, and the tail, which terminates in an axial fibre, probably contains spiral or coiled structures, as in mammalian spermatozoa.
Related Papers (5)