Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Compared with Digital Mammography Alone: Results of a Multicenter, Multireader Trial
Elizabeth A. Rafferty,Jeong Mi Park,Liane E. Philpotts,Steven P. Poplack,Jules H. Sumkin,Elkan F. Halpern,Loren Niklason +6 more
TLDR
Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography offers the dual benefit of significantly increased diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduced recall rates for noncancer cases.Abstract:
The addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography offers the dual benefit of improved diagnostic accuracy and significant reduction in false-positive recall rate, thereby avoiding unnecessary additional testing and decreasing attendant anxiety, inconvenience, and cost for women.read more
Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
The effect of prevalence of disease on performance of residents and fellows during training for interpreting DBT in a test-train-test observer study
Christiane M. Hakim,Lauren Q. Chang Sen,Andrew J. Degnan,Joseph Delic,Sarah Pai,Hersh Sagreiya,Mark C. Sparrow,Ernestine Thomas,Michael Yannes,David Gur +9 more
TL;DR: Early training with low disease prevalence of “what not to recall” should be included during training for interpreting DBT screening examinations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Automated breast ultrasound: a novel approach to screening women with dense breasts
Megan J. Lenihan,Rachel F. Brem +1 more
TL;DR: Automated breast ultrasound is proving to be a useful adjunct to mammography, which helps to catch cancer at an earlier and more treatable stage, which physicians can review quickly and easily.
Book ChapterDOI
Breast cancer screening
TL;DR: Future efforts should focus on improving pretest risk stratification, considering new noninvasive adjunct technologies to reduce the need for invasive confirmatory procedures, and incorporating the risk preferences of individual women toward precision screening.
Journal ArticleDOI
A computer vision-based algorithm to predict false positive errors in radiology trainees when interpreting digital breast tomosynthesis cases
TL;DR: An algorithm is developed to identify locations on DBT where trainees are more likely to commit false positive errors, and improved the status quo of case presentation with random selection to trainee in breast tomosynthesis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
TL;DR: Although lung cancer screening is not an alternative to smoking cessation, the USPSTF found adequate evidence that annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in a defined population of high-risk persons can prevent a substantial number of lung cancerrelated deaths.
Journal ArticleDOI
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY: Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare
Laszlo Tabar,Laszlo Tabar,Laszlo Tabar,Adel Gad,Adel Gad,Adel Gad,L. H. Holmberg,L. H. Holmberg,L. H. Holmberg,U. Ljungquist,U. Ljungquist,U. Ljungquist,C.J.G Fagerberg,C.J.G Fagerberg,C.J.G Fagerberg,L. Baldetorp,L. Baldetorp,L. Baldetorp,O Gröntoft,O Gröntoft,O Gröntoft,B. Lundström,B. Lundström,B. Lundström,J. C. Månson,J. C. Månson,J. C. Månson,Gunnar Eklund,Gunnar Eklund,Gunnar Eklund,N.E Day,N.E Day,N.E Day,F. Pettersson,F. Pettersson,F. Pettersson +35 more
TL;DR: 7 years after the start of the study the excess of stage I cancers in the study group largely outweighs the deficit of advanced cancers, and the results to the end of 1984 show a 31% reduction in mortality from breast cancer and a 25% reduced in the rate of stage II or more advanced breast cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
Etta D. Pisano,Constantine Gatsonis,Edward Hendrick,Martin J. Yaffe,Janet K. Baum,Suddhasatta Acharyya,Emily F. Conant,Laurie L. Fajardo,Lawrence W. Bassett,Roberta A. Jong,Murray Rebner +10 more
TL;DR: The overall diagnostic accuracy of digital and film mammography as a means of screening for breast cancer is similar, but digital mammography is more accurate in women under the age of 50 years, women with radiographically dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Ned Calonge,Diana B. Petitti,Thomas G. DeWitt,Allen J. Dietrich,Kimberly D. Gregory,David C. Grossman,George Isham,Michael L. LeFevre,Rosanne M. Leipzig,Lucy N. Marion,Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,Virginia A. Moyer,Judith K. Ockene,George F. Sawaya,J. Sanford Schwartz,Timothy J Wilt,US Preventive Serv Task Force +16 more
TL;DR: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess additional benefits and harms of either digital mammography or magnetic resonance imaging instead of film mammography as screening modalities for breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.
Patricia A. Carney,Diana L. Miglioretti,Bonnie C. Yankaskas,Karla Kerlikowske,Robert D. Rosenberg,Carolyn M. Rutter,Berta M. Geller,Linn Abraham,Steven H. Taplin,Mark Dignan,Gary Cutter,Rachel Ballard-Barbash +11 more
TL;DR: The accuracy of screening mammography is best in older women and in women with fatty breasts, and the individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and HRT use on mammographic accuracy are examined.