Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer: Understanding the Molecular Basis of Histologic Grade To Improve Prognosis
Christos Sotiriou,Pratyaksha Wirapati,Sherene Loi,Adrian L. Harris,Steve Fox,Johanna Smeds,Hans Nordgren,Pierre Farmer,Viviane Praz,Benjamin Haibe-Kains,Christine Desmedt,Denis Larsimont,Fatima Cardoso,Hans Peterse,Dimitry S.A. Nuyten,Marc Buyse,Marc J. van de Vijver,Jonas Bergh,Martine Piccart,Mauro Delorenzi +19 more
TLDR
Gene expression grade index appeared to reclassify patients with histologic grade 2 tumors into two groups with high versus low risks of recurrence, which may improve the accuracy of tumor grading and thus its prognostic value.Abstract:
Background: Histologic grade in breast cancer provides clinically important prognostic information. However, 30% – 60% of tumors are classifi ed as histologic grade 2. This grade is associated with an intermediate risk of recurrence and is thus not informative for clinical decision making. We examined whether histologic grade was associated with gene expression profi les of breast cancers and whether such profi les could be used to improve histologic grading. Methods: We analyzed microarray data from 189 invasive breast carcinomas and from three published gene expression datasets from breast carcinomas. We identifi ed differentially expressed genes in a training set of 64 estrogen receptor (ER) – positive tumor samples by comparing expression profi les between histologic grade 3 tumors and histologic grade 1 tumors and used the expression of these genes to defi ne the gene expression grade index. Data from 597 independent tumors were used to evaluate the association between relapse-free survival and the gene expression grade index in a Kaplan – Meier analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We identifi ed 97 genes in our training set that were associated with histologic grade; most of these genes were involved in cell cycle regulation and proliferation. In validation datasets, the gene expression grade index was strongly associated with histologic grade 1 and 3 status; however, among histologic grade 2 tumors, the index spanned the values for histologic grade 1 – 3 tumors. Among patients with histologic grade 2 tumors, a high gene expression grade index was associated with a higher risk of recurrence than a low gene expression grade index (hazard ratio = 3.61, 95% confi dence interval = 2.25 to 5.78; P <.001, log-rank test). Conclusions: Gene expression grade index appeared to reclassify patients with histologic grade 2 tumors into two groups with high versus low risks of recurrence. This approach may improve the accuracy of tumor grading and thus its prognostic value. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:262 – 72]read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies
Brian D. Lehmann,Joshua A. Bauer,Xi Chen,Melinda E. Sanders,A. Bapsi Chakravarthy,Yu Shyr,Jennifer A. Pietenpol +6 more
TL;DR: Gen expression profiles from 21 breast cancer data sets and identified 587 TNBC cases may be useful in biomarker selection, drug discovery, and clinical trial design that will enable alignment of TNBC patients to appropriate targeted therapies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Joel S. Parker,Michael Mullins,Maggie C.U. Cheang,Samuel Leung,David Voduc,Tammi L. Vickery,Sherri R. Davies,Christiane Fauron,Xiaping He,Zhiyuan Hu,John Quackenbush,Inge J. Stijleman,Juan P. Palazzo,James Stephen Marron,Andrew B. Nobel,Elaine R. Mardis,Torsten O. Nielsen,Matthew J. Ellis,Charles M. Perou,Philip S. Bernard +19 more
TL;DR: D diagnosis by intrinsic subtype adds significant prognostic and predictive information to standard parameters for patients with breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI
An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients.
Balazs Gyorffy,András Lánczky,Aron Charles Eklund,Carsten Denkert,Jan Budczies,Qiyuan Li,Zoltan Szallasi,Zoltan Szallasi +7 more
TL;DR: An online tool to draw survival plots, which can be used to assess the relevance of the expression levels of various genes on the clinical outcome both in untreated and treated breast cancer patients, and which validated the capability of microarrays to determine estrogen receptor status in 1,231 patients.
Journal ArticleDOI
An embryonic stem cell–like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors
Ittai Ben-Porath,Matt Thomson,Vincent J. Carey,Ruping Ge,George W. Bell,Aviv Regev,Robert A. Weinberg +6 more
TL;DR: The results reveal a previously unknown link between genes associated with ES cell identity and the histopathological traits of tumors and support the possibility that these genes contribute to stem cell–like phenotypes shown by many tumors.
Journal ArticleDOI
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
Lyndsay Harris,Herbert A. Fritsche,Robert G. Mennel,Larry Norton,Peter M. Ravdin,Sheila E. Taube,Mark R. Somerfield,Daniel F. Hayes,Robert C. Bast +8 more
TL;DR: Thirteen categories of breast tumor markers were considered, six of which were new for the guideline, and certain multiparameter gene expression assays not all applications for these markers were supported, however.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Charles M. Perou,Therese Sørlie,Michael B. Eisen,Matt van de Rijn,Stefanie S. Jeffrey,Christian A. Rees,Jonathan R. Pollack,Douglas T. Ross,Hilde Johnsen,Lars A. Akslen,Øystein Fluge,Alexander Pergamenschikov,Cheryl A. Williams,Shirley Zhu,Per Eystein Lønning,Anne Lise Børresen-Dale,Patrick O. Brown,David Botstein +17 more
TL;DR: Variation in gene expression patterns in a set of 65 surgical specimens of human breast tumours from 42 different individuals were characterized using complementary DNA microarrays representing 8,102 human genes, providing a distinctive molecular portrait of each tumour.
Journal ArticleDOI
Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications
Therese Sørlie,Charles M. Perou,Robert Tibshirani,Turid Aas,Stephanie Geisler,Hilde Johnsen,Trevor Hastie,Michael B. Eisen,Matt van de Rijn,Stefanie S. Jeffrey,T. Thorsen,Hanne Quist,John C. Matese,Patrick O. Brown,David Botstein,Per Eystein Lønning,Anne Lise Børresen-Dale +16 more
TL;DR: Survival analyses on a subcohort of patients with locally advanced breast cancer uniformly treated in a prospective study showed significantly different outcomes for the patients belonging to the various groups, including a poor prognosis for the basal-like subtype and a significant difference in outcome for the two estrogen receptor-positive groups.
Book
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Larry V. Hedges,Ingram Olkin +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a model for estimating the effect size from a series of experiments using a fixed effect model and a general linear model, and combine these two models to estimate the effect magnitude.
Journal ArticleDOI
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Laura J. van't Veer,Hongyue Dai,Marc J. van de Vijver,Yudong D. He,Augustinus A. M. Hart,Mao Mao,Hans Peterse,Karin van der Kooy,Matthew J. Marton,Anke T. Witteveen,George J. Schreiber,Ron M. Kerkhoven,Christopher J. Roberts,Peter S. Linsley,René Bernards,Stephen H. Friend +15 more
TL;DR: DNA microarray analysis on primary breast tumours of 117 young patients is used and supervised classification is applied to identify a gene expression signature strongly predictive of a short interval to distant metastases (‘poor prognosis’ signature) in patients without tumour cells in local lymph nodes at diagnosis, providing a strategy to select patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Journal ArticleDOI
A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias
TL;DR: Three methods of performing normalization at the probe intensity level are presented: a one number scaling based algorithm and a method that uses a non-linear normalizing relation by comparing the variability and bias of an expression measure and the simplest and quickest complete data method is found to perform favorably.
Related Papers (5)
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer.
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
Marc J. van de Vijver,Yudong D. He,Laura J. van't Veer,Hongyue Dai,Augustinus A. M. Hart,D.W. Voskuil,George J. Schreiber,Johannes L. Peterse,Christopher J. Roberts,Matthew J. Marton,Mark Parrish,Douwe Atsma,Anke T. Witteveen,Annuska M. Glas,Leonie J. M. J. Delahaye,Tony van de Velde,Harry Bartelink,Sjoerd Rodenhuis,Emiel J. Th. Rutgers,Stephen H. Friend,René Bernards +20 more
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Charles M. Perou,Therese Sørlie,Michael B. Eisen,Matt van de Rijn,Stefanie S. Jeffrey,Christian A. Rees,Jonathan R. Pollack,Douglas T. Ross,Hilde Johnsen,Lars A. Akslen,Øystein Fluge,Alexander Pergamenschikov,Cheryl A. Williams,Shirley Zhu,Per Eystein Lønning,Anne Lise Børresen-Dale,Patrick O. Brown,David Botstein +17 more