scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Implementation Mapping provides a systematic process for developing strategies to improve the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings.
Abstract
Background: The ultimate impact of a health innovation depends not only on its effectiveness but also on its reach in the population and the extent to which it is implemented with high levels of completeness and fidelity. Implementation science has emerged as the potential solution to the failure to translate evidence from research into effective practice and policy evident in many fields. Implementation scientists have developed many frameworks, theories and models, which describe implementation determinants, processes, or outcomes; yet, there is little guidance about how these can inform the development or selection of implementation strategies (methods or techniques used to improve adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of interventions) (1, 2). To move the implementation science field forward and to provide a practical tool to apply the knowledge in this field, we describe a systematic process for planning or selecting implementation strategies: Implementation Mapping. Methods: Implementation Mapping is based on Intervention Mapping (a six-step protocol that guides the design of multi-level health promotion interventions and implementation strategies) and expands on Intervention Mapping step 5. It includes insights from both the implementation science field and Intervention Mapping. Implementation Mapping involves five tasks: (1) conduct an implementation needs assessment and identify program adopters and implementers; (2) state adoption and implementation outcomes and performance objectives, identify determinants, and create matrices of change objectives; (3) choose theoretical methods (mechanisms of change) and select or design implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. The tasks are iterative with the planner circling back to previous steps throughout this process to ensure all adopters and implementers, outcomes, determinants, and objectives are addressed. Discussion: Implementation Mapping provides a systematic process for developing strategies to improve the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

The Answer Is 17 Years, What Is the Question

TL;DR: The study concludes that understanding lags first requires agreeing models, definitions and measures, which can be applied in practice, and a second task would be to develop a process by which to gather these data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples

TL;DR: Intervention Mapping is described, a framework for theory- and evidence-based health promotion program planning that addresses this challenge by providing a systematic and stepwise approach to planning interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combatting Social Isolation Among Older Adults in a Time of Physical Distancing: The COVID-19 Social Connectivity Paradox

TL;DR: The primary purposes of this article are to provide an overview of the complex interconnectedness between social isolation, loneliness, and depression while introducing the COVID-19 Connectivity Paradox, a new concept used to describe the conflicting risk/harm continuum resulting from recommended physical distancing.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects.

TL;DR: The Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) is a semi-structured, principle-guided tool designed to improve the specification, rigor, reproducibility, and testable causal pathways involved in implementation research projects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a vision and set of action steps for making health equity a more prominent and central aim of implementation science, thus committing to conduct implementation science through equity-focused principles to achieve this vision.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic Review: Process of Forming Academic Service Partnerships to Reform Clinical Education

TL;DR: This study’s findings can provide practical guidelines to steer partnership programs within the academic and clinical bodies, with the aim of providing a collaborative partnership approach to clinical education.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

TL;DR: The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means

TL;DR: This article examines health promotion and disease prevention from the perspective of social cognitive theory, a multifaceted causal structure in which self-efficacy beliefs operate together with goals, outcome expectations, and perceived environmental impediments and facilitators in the regulation of human motivation, behavior, and well-being.
Journal ArticleDOI

Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

TL;DR: This paper reviews the principles and practice of purposeful sampling in implementation research, summarizes types and categories of purposefully sampling strategies and provides a set of recommendations for use of single strategy or multistage strategy designs, particularly for state implementation research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

TL;DR: The results indicated that feedback may be more effective when baseline performance is low, the source is a supervisor or colleague, it is provided more than once, and the role of context and the targeted clinical behaviour was assessed.
Related Papers (5)