scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Incretin based treatments and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

TLDR
Current evidence does not support the suggestion that incretin based treatment increases all cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and suggested the possibility of a mortality benefit with GLP-1 agonists but not DPP-4 inhibitors.
Abstract
Objective  To assess the impact of incretin based treatment on all cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Data sources  Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligibility criteria  Randomised controlled trials that compared glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with placebo or active anti-diabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Data collection and analysis  Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. Peto’s method was used as the primary approach to pool effect estimates from trials, sensitivity analyses were carried out with other statistical approaches, and meta-regression was applied for six prespecified hypotheses to explore heterogeneity. The GRADE approach was used to rate the quality of evidence. Results  189 randomised controlled trials (n=155 145) were included, all of which were at low to moderate risk of bias; 77 reported no events of death and 112 reported 3888 deaths among 151 614 patients. Meta-analysis of 189 trials showed no difference in all cause mortality between incretin drugs versus control (1925/84 136 v 1963/67 478; odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.02, I 2 =0%; risk difference 3 fewer events (95% confidence interval 7 fewer to 1 more) per 1000 patients over five years; moderate quality evidence). Results suggested the possibility of a mortality benefit with GLP-1 agonists but not DPP-4 inhibitors, but the subgroup hypothesis had low credibility. Sensitivity analyses showed no important differences in the estimates of effects. Conclusions  Current evidence does not support the suggestion that incretin based treatment increases all cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further studies are warranted to examine if the effect differs between GLP-1 agonists versus DPP-4 inhibitors.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Role of DPP-4 Inhibitors in the Treatment Algorithm of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: When to Select, What to Expect.

TL;DR: The mechanism of action, therapeutic utility, and the role of DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

A proposed framework to guide evidence synthesis practice for meta-analysis with zero-events studies.

TL;DR: The proposed framework provides a reasonable basis for the development of methodological guidelines to deal with zero-events in meta-analysis and should be considered by researchers when making decisions on the selection of the synthesis methods in a meta- analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diets and drugs for weight loss and health in obesity - An update.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an update on promising diets and pharmacological aids for weight management and obesity comorbidities, including Mediterranean diet, intermittent fasting, and bupropion-naltrexone.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Book

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition)

TL;DR: Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings, systematic review registration number 2.
Related Papers (5)