scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
MEK162 is the first targeted therapy to show activity in patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and might offer a new option for a cancer with few effective treatments.
Abstract
Summary Background Patients with melanoma harbouring Val600 BRAF mutations benefit from treatment with BRAF inhibitors. However, no targeted treatments exist for patients with BRAF wild-type tumours, including those with NRAS mutations. We aimed to assess the use of MEK162, a small-molecule MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with NRAS -mutated or Val600 BRAF -mutated advanced melanoma. Methods In our open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study, we assigned patients with NRAS -mutated or BRAF -mutated advanced melanoma to one of three treatment arms on the basis of mutation status. Patients were enrolled at university hospitals or private cancer centres in Europe and the USA. The three arms were: twice-daily MEK162 45 mg for NRAS -mutated melanoma, twice-daily MEK162 45 mg for BRAF -mutated melanoma, and twice-daily MEK162 60 mg for BRAF -mutated melanoma. Previous treatment with BRAF inhibitors was permitted, but previous MEK inhibitor therapy was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an objective response (ie, a complete response or confirmed partial response). We report data for the 45 mg groups. We assessed clinical activity in all patients who received at least one dose of MEK162 and in patients assessable for response (with two available CT scans). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01320085, and is currently recruiting additional patients with NRAS mutations (based on a protocol amendment). Findings Between March 31, 2011, and Jan 17, 2012, we enrolled 71 patients who received at least one dose of MEK162 45 mg. By Feb 29, 2012 (data cutoff), median follow-up was 3·3 months (range 0·6–8·7; IQR 2·2–5·0). No patients had a complete response. Six (20%) of 30 patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma had a partial response (three confirmed) as did eight (20%) of 41 patients with BRAF -mutated melanoma (two confirmed). The most frequent adverse events were acneiform dermatitis (18 [60%] patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and 15 [37%] patients with the BRAF -mutated melanoma), rash (six [20%] and 16 [39%]), peripheral oedema (ten [33%] and 14 [34%]), facial oedema (nine [30%] and seven [17%]), diarrhoea (eight [27%] and 15 [37%]), and creatine phosphokinase increases (11 [37%] and nine [22%]). Increased creatine phosphokinase was the most common grade 3–4 adverse event (seven [23%] and seven [17%]). Four patients had serious adverse events (two per arm), which included diarrhoea, dehydration, acneiform dermatitis, general physical deterioration, irregular heart rate, malaise, and small intestinal perforation. No deaths occurred from treatment-related causes. Interpretation To our knowledge, MEK162 is the first targeted therapy to show activity in patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and might offer a new option for a cancer with few effective treatments. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations.

TL;DR: This study reports a PanCancer and PanSoftware analysis spanning 9,423 tumor exomes (comprising all 33 of The Cancer Genome Atlas projects) and using 26 computational tools to catalog driver genes and mutations, identifying 299 driver genes with implications regarding their anatomical sites and cancer/cell types.
Journal ArticleDOI

Targeted agents and immunotherapies: optimizing outcomes in melanoma.

TL;DR: The clinical trial data that established the standard-of-care treatment approaches for advanced-stage melanoma are reviewed and a rational approach to frontline-treatment selection for each individual patient with BRAF-mutant melanoma is outlined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Targeting RAS–ERK signalling in cancer: promises and challenges

TL;DR: Both intrinsic and acquired resistance to RAF and MEK inhibitors are frequently associated with the persistence of ERK signalling in the presence of the drug, implying the need for more innovative approaches to target the pathway.
Journal ArticleDOI

Targeting RAF kinases for cancer therapy: BRAF-mutated melanoma and beyond

TL;DR: This Review describes the development of BRAF inhibitors and the results that have emerged from their analysis in both the laboratory and the clinic and enumerates mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibition that have been characterized.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Aberrant B-Raf Signaling in Human Cancer − 10 Years from Bench to Bedside

TL;DR: A review of the current knowledge on the regulation of this kinase under physiological circumstances and how this control is lost by mutations is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

A phase I study of MEK inhibitor MEK162 (ARRY-438162) in patients with biliary tract cancer.

TL;DR: MEK162 has an acceptable safety profile and desirable PK properties at 60 mg BID and RECIST responses were observed in pts with BTC, and the PK in this population was equivalent to that observed in prior studies.
Journal Article

Advances in targeted therapy for melanoma.

TL;DR: Advances in targeted strategies to treat different subgroups of patients with melanoma are reviewed, and inhibitors of the MAPK pathway and of KIT are currently undergoing clinical investigation.
Journal ArticleDOI

162 MEK162 (ARRY-162), a novel MEK 1/2 inhibitor, inhibits tumor growth regardless of KRas/Raf pathway mutations

TL;DR: It is demonstrated in a 3D inverted invasion assay that the TGF-b pathway represents a key molecular event in the initial steps of carcinoma invasion, indicating that the acquisition of a high risk of recurrence phenotype in endometrial carcinomas strongly relies on T GF-b1.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Abstract B243: A phase I dose-escalation study of MEK inhibitor MEK162 (ARRY-438162) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

TL;DR: MEK162 had an acceptable safety profile at doses up to the MTD of 60 mg BID and showed preliminary signs of clinical activity at dose levels above which it showed desirable PK properties with dose-dependent exposures.
Related Papers (5)