Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
TLDR
Patients explained the web of influences on knowledge, motivation, and ability to undergo CRC screening, which clinicians and policymakers should consider in designing interventions to increase the level of screening.About:
This article is published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine.The article was published on 2010-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 278 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Mass screening & Focus group.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies
NaNa Keum,Edward Giovannucci +1 more
TL;DR: With increasing incidence of CRC at younger ages, there is an urgent need to better identify high-risk individuals younger than 50 years, the age when screening typically starts, and aspirin probably confers chemopreventive benefit against CRC.
Journal ArticleDOI
Microbiota-based model improves the sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for detecting colonic lesions
TL;DR: A random forest classification model that detects colonic lesions using the relative abundance of gut microbiota and the concentration of hemoglobin in stool found that the loss of potentially beneficial organisms, such as members of the Lachnospiraceae, was more predictive for identifying patients with adenomas when used in combination with FIT.
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar,Monika Kastner,Vincent Vuong,Laure Perrier,Corinne Daly,Linda Rabeneck,Sharon E. Straus,Nancy N. Baxter,Nancy N. Baxter +8 more
TL;DR: A systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies to identify facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening participation and identifies key barriers, facilitators, and mediators to colOREctalcancer screening participation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.
Samir Gupta,Daniel A. Sussman,Daniel A. Sussman,Chyke A. Doubeni,Daniel S. Anderson,Lukejohn W. Day,Amar R. Deshpande,B. Joseph Elmunzer,Adeyinka O. Laiyemo,Jeanette Mendez,Ma Somsouk,James E. Allison,James E. Allison,Taft Bhuket,Zhuo Z Geng,Beverly B. Green,Steven H. Itzkowitz,Maria Elena Martinez +17 more
TL;DR: This commentary represents the consensus of a diverse group of experts in cancer control and prevention, epidemiology, gastroenterology, and primary care from across the country who formed the Coalition to Boost Screening among the Underserved in the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI
The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.
Resa M. Jones,Steven H. Woolf,Tina D. Cunningham,Robert E. Johnson,Alex H. Krist,Stephen F. Rothemich,Sally W. Vernon +6 more
TL;DR: Evidence that patients are more familiar with colonoscopy than with other modalities suggests an opportunity to improve screening rates by educating patients about alternative tests.
References
More filters
Book
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
TL;DR: This book presents a step-by-step guide to making the research results presented in reports, slideshows, posters, and data visualizations more interesting, and describes how coding initiates qualitative data analysis.
Book
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
TL;DR: This book discusses writing and Evaluating Mixed Methods Research, and the importance of knowing the structure of the writing so that it Relates to the Designs Evaluating a Mixed Methods Study Within Designs.
Book
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
TL;DR: The eagerly anticipated fourth edition of the title that pioneered the comparison of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research design, John W, Creswell as discussed by the authors, includes a preliminary consideration of philosophical assumptions, a review of the literature, an assessment of the use of theory in research approaches, and reflections about the importance writing and ethics in scholarly inquiry.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cancer statistics, 2008.
Ahmedin Jemal,Rebecca L. Siegel,Elizabeth Ward,Yongping Hao,Jiaquan Xu,Taylor Murray,Michael J. Thun +6 more
TL;DR: This report examines cancer incidence, mortality, and survival by site, sex, race/ethnicity, education, geographic area, and calendar year, as well as the proportionate contribution of selected sites to the overall trends.
Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed.
TL;DR: A Framework for Design Three Elements of Inquiry Alternative Knowledge Claims Strategies of Inquiry Research Methods Three Approaches to Research Criteria for Selecting an Approach Personal Experiences Audience Summary Writing Exercises Additional Readings.
Related Papers (5)
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo,David C. Grossman,Susan J. Curry,Karina W. Davidson,John W. Epling,Francisco A.R. Garcia,Matthew W. Gillman,Diane M. Harper,Alex R. Kemper,Alex H. Krist,Ann E. Kurth,C. Seth Landefeld,Carol M. Mangione,Douglas K Owens,Douglas K Owens,William R. Phillips,Maureen G. Phipps,Michael Pignone,Albert L. Siu,Albert L. Siu +19 more