OtherDOI
Patient-reported outcomes
Bradley C. Johnston,Donald L. Patrick,Tahira Devji,Lara J Maxwell,Clifton O. Bingham,Dorcas E. Beaton,Maarten Boers,Matthias Briel,Jason W. Busse,Alonso Carrasco-Labra,Alonso Carrasco-Labra,Robin Christensen,Bruno R. da Costa,Regina El Dib,Anne Lyddiatt,Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo,Beverley Shea,Jasvinder A. Singh,Caroline B. Terwee,Paula R Williamson,Joel Gagnier,Peter Tugwell,Peter Tugwell,Gordon H. Guyatt +23 more
- pp 479-492
TLDR
Summary data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important to ensure healthcare decision makers are informed about the outcomes most meaningful to patients.Abstract:
Authors of systematic reviews that include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) should have a good understanding of how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are developed, including the constructs they are intended to measure, their reliability, validity and responsiveness. This chapter describes the category of outcomes known as PROs and their importance for healthcare decision making, and illustrates the key issues related to reliability, validity and responsiveness that systematic review authors should consider when including PROs. It also addresses the structure and content of PROs and provides guidance for combining information from different PROs. The chapter outlines a step-by-step approach to addressing each of these elements in the systematic review process. The focus is on the use of PROs in randomized trials, and what is crucial in this context when selecting PROs to include in a meta-analysis. The chapter describes PROMs in more detail and discusses some issues to consider when deciding which PROMs to address in a review.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Renal cell carcinoma.
James J. Hsieh,Mark P. Purdue,Sabina Signoretti,Charles Swanton,Laurence Albiges,Manuela Schmidinger,Daniel Y. Heng,James Larkin,Vincenzo Ficarra +8 more
TL;DR: An overview of the biology of RCC, with a focus on ccRCC, as well as updates to complement the current clinical guidelines and an outline of potential future directions for RCC research and therapy are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI
Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice
Jose M Valderas,Jordi Alonso +1 more
TL;DR: This classification system of PRO measures, based on a valid integrated conceptual model, should allow the classification of most currently used instruments and may facilitate a more adequate selection and application of these instruments.
Journal ArticleDOI
A meta-analytic review of stand-alone interventions to improve body image
TL;DR: Meta-analysis of stand-alone interventions to improve body image shows that interventions engender only small improvements in body image, and underline the need for large-scale, high-quality trials in this area.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments
Lidwine B. Mokkink,Caroline B. Terwee,Paul W. Stratford,Jordi Alonso,Donald L. Patrick,Ingrid I. Riphagen,Ingrid I. Riphagen,Dirk L. Knol,Lex M. Bouter,Lex M. Bouter,Henrica C.W. de Vet +10 more
TL;DR: A systematic review of measurement properties of health-status instruments is a tool for evaluating the quality of instruments as mentioned in this paper, where the authors assess the methodological quality of primary studies and describe how authors evaluate results of the studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
TL;DR: Understanding PLEM is an opportunity for practitioners to identify particular MRBs that patients encounter, and provide individualised care through selection of therapeutic care plans that suit a patient's life, as well as helping to achieve patients’ medication-related needs, and improve medication therapy and health outcomes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity
TL;DR: Twenty cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of empirical validity previously published for the 36-item short-form scales and summary measures were replicated for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the12-item Mental Component Summary, including comparisons between patient groups known to differ or to change in terms of the presence and seriousness of physical and mental conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Lee J. Cronbach,Paul E. Meehl +1 more
TL;DR: The present interpretation of construct validity is not "official" and deals with some areas where the Committee would probably not be unanimous, but the present writers are solely responsible for this attempt to explain the concept and elaborate its implications.
Journal ArticleDOI
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Elie A. Akl,Regina Kunz,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Jan Brozek,Susan L Norris,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Paul Glasziou,Hans deBeer,Roman Jaeschke,David Rind,Joerg J Meerpohl,Philipp Dahm,Holger J. Schünemann +14 more
TL;DR: The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes, and provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.
David Cella,Susan Yount,Susan Yount,Nan E. Rothrock,Richard Gershon,Richard Gershon,Karon F. Cook,Bryce B. Reeve,Deborah N. Ader,James F. Fries,Bonnie Bruce,Mattias Rose +11 more
TL;DR: The NIHPROMIS network derived a consensus-based framework for self-reported health, systematically reviewed available instruments and datasets that address the initial PROMIS domains, and began testing of item banks covering 5 broad domains of self- reported health.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.
TL;DR: Responsiveness should join reliability and validity as necessary requirements for instruments designed primarily to measure change over time in psychometric measures.
Related Papers (5)
The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.
John E. Ware,Cathy D. Sherbourne +1 more
Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes
Peter Fayers,David Machin +1 more