Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Implementation Science is introducing a policy of initially encouraging and subsequently requiring the scientific reporting of complex behaviour change interventions.Abstract:
Complex behaviour change interventions are not well described; when they are described, the terminology used is inconsistent. This constrains scientific replication, and limits the subsequent introduction of successful interventions. Implementation Science is introducing a policy of initially encouraging and subsequently requiring the scientific reporting of complex behaviour change interventions.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.
TL;DR: Interventions and policies to change behaviour can be usefully characterised by means of a BCW comprising: a 'behaviour system' at the hub, encircled by intervention functions and then by policy categories, and a new framework aimed at overcoming their limitations is developed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
Tammy Hoffmann,Paul Glasziou,Isabelle Boutron,Ruairidh Milne,Rafael Perera,David Moher,Douglas G. Altman,Virginia Barbour,Helen Macdonald,Marie Johnston,Sarah E Lamb,Mary Dixon-Woods,Peter McCulloch,Jeremy C Wyatt,An-Wen Chan,Susan Michie +15 more
TL;DR: The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions
Susan Michie,Michelle Richardson,Marie Johnston,Marie Johnston,Charles Abraham,Jill J Francis,Wendy Hardeman,Martin P Eccles,James E. Cane,Caroline E Wood +9 more
TL;DR: “BCT taxonomy v1,” an extensive taxonomy of 93 consensually agreed, distinct BCTs, offers a step change as a method for specifying interventions, but the authors anticipate further development and evaluation based on international, interdisciplinary consensus.
Journal ArticleDOI
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda
Enola K. Proctor,Hiie Silmere,Ramesh Raghavan,Peter S. Hovmand,Greg Aarons,Alicia C. Bunger,Richard H Griffey,Melissa A. Hensley +7 more
TL;DR: A heuristic, working “taxonomy” of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes—acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability—along with their nominal definitions is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Graham Moore,Suzanne Audrey,Mary Barker,Lyndal Bond,Chris Bonell,Wendy Hardeman,Laurence Moore,Alicia O’Cathain,Tannaze Tinati,Daniel Wight,Janis Baird +10 more
TL;DR: New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies that will help improve the quality of decision-making in the design and testing of complex interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
E von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
E von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The STROBE Statement is a checklist of items that should be addressed in articles reporting on the 3 main study designs of analytical epidemiology: cohort, casecontrol, and cross-sectional studies; these recommendations are not prescriptions for designing or conducting studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance
TL;DR: The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
TL;DR: A parsimonious and evidence-based model for considering the diffusion of innovations in health service organizations, clear knowledge gaps where further research should be focused, and a robust and transferable methodology for systematically reviewing health service policy and management are discussed.