Q2. What have the authors stated for future works in "The crep program and the ice-d production rate calibration database: a fully parameterizable and updated online tool to compute cosmic- ray exposure ages" ?
New geomagnetic and atmospheric databases with improved accuracy will probably be added in the future. Since the authors designed the online calculator CREp and the ICE-D database to be constantly upgraded with the latest updates of cosmogenic nuclide systematics, they will greatly appreciate future readers ' suggestions.
Q3. What is the process of calculating the production rate of a cosmogenic nuclide?
As production rates vary with latitude, altitude, and also with time due to temporal fluctuations in the atmospheric density and the Earth's magnetic field, a complicated scaling procedure is necessary to obtain the appropriate production rate for dating.
Q4. What is the typical method of calculating the production rate of a cosmogenic nucli?
The usual method consists of, first, converting the reference production rate at a calibration site into a Sea Level High Latitude (SLHL) rate, corrected for the past geomagnetic activity over the calibration time period.
Q5. What is the reason why the LSD model is prone to overestimate the production rate?
Neutron-monitor based models (Desilets and Zreda, 2003; Desilets et al., 2006; Dunai, 2001; Lifton et al., 2005) are prone to overestimate the altitude dependence of cosmogenic-nuclide production while the older Lal-Stone model turned out to be robust and in good agreement with the LSDmodel.
Q6. What is the way to scale the cosmic-ray flux?
The authors thus use this as a first order indicator of the scaling ability to take into account the spatial and temporal variability of the cosmic-ray flux: the lower MSWD, the better the scaling procedure is.
Q7. What is the way to improve CREp?
In this regard, a great improvement to CREp would be to add a time variable atmospheric pressure field, that could be, for example, derived from global circulation models (e.g. Staiger et al., 2007).
Q8. What is the effect of the exclusion of outliers?
given the number of calibration sites in the existing dataset (31 calibration sites for 10Be and 23 sites for 3He), the exclusion of outliers should not have a big effect.