scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Austral University

EducationBuenos Aires, Argentina
About: Austral University is a education organization based out in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Boundary value problem & Stefan problem. The organization has 1002 authors who have published 1450 publications receiving 33847 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Kotb Abdelmohsen2, Akihisa Abe3, Joynal Abedin4  +2519 moreInstitutions (695)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macro-autophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

5,187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ting Shi1, David A. McAllister2, Katherine L. O'Brien3, Eric A. F. Simões4, Shabir A. Madhi5, Bradford D. Gessner, Fernando P. Polack, Evelyn Balsells1, Sozinho Acácio6, Claudia Aguayo, Issifou Alassani, Asad Ali7, Martin Antonio8, Shally Awasthi9, Juliet O. Awori10, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner11, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner12, Henry C. Baggett12, Vicky L. Baillie5, Angel Balmaseda, Alfredo Barahona, Sudha Basnet13, Sudha Basnet14, Quique Bassat6, Quique Bassat15, Wilma Basualdo, Godfrey Bigogo10, Louis Bont16, Robert F. Breiman17, W. Abdullah Brooks3, W. Abdullah Brooks11, Shobha Broor18, Nigel Bruce19, Dana Bruden12, Philippe Buchy20, Stuart Campbell1, Phyllis Carosone-Link20, Mandeep S. Chadha21, James Chipeta22, Monidarin Chou23, Wilfrido Clara12, Cheryl Cohen24, Cheryl Cohen5, Elizabeth de Cuellar, Duc Anh Dang, Budragchaagiin Dash-Yandag, Maria Deloria-Knoll3, Mukesh Dherani19, Tekchheng Eap, Bernard E. Ebruke8, Marcela Echavarria, Carla Cecília de Freitas Lázaro Emediato, Rodrigo Fasce, Daniel R. Feikin12, Luzhao Feng25, Angela Gentile26, Aubree Gordon27, Doli Goswami3, Doli Goswami11, Sophie Goyet20, Michelle J. Groome5, Natasha B. Halasa28, Siddhivinayak Hirve, Nusrat Homaira11, Nusrat Homaira29, Stephen R. C. Howie30, Stephen R. C. Howie8, Stephen R. C. Howie31, Jorge Jara32, Imane Jroundi15, Cissy B. Kartasasmita, Najwa Khuri-Bulos33, Karen L. Kotloff34, Anand Krishnan18, Romina Libster28, Romina Libster35, Olga Lopez, Marilla G. Lucero36, Florencia Lución26, Socorro Lupisan36, Debora N. Marcone, John P. McCracken32, Mario Mejia, Jennifer C. Moïsi, Joel M. Montgomery12, David P. Moore5, Cinta Moraleda15, Jocelyn Moyes24, Jocelyn Moyes5, Patrick K. Munywoki10, Patrick K. Munywoki37, Kuswandewi Mutyara, Mark P. Nicol38, D. James Nokes39, D. James Nokes10, Pagbajabyn Nymadawa40, Maria Tereza da Costa Oliveira, Histoshi Oshitani41, Nitin Pandey9, Gláucia Paranhos-Baccalà42, Lia Neu Phillips17, Valentina Picot42, Mustafizur Rahman11, Mala Rakoto-Andrianarivelo, Zeba A Rasmussen43, Barbara Rath44, Annick Robinson, Candice Romero, Graciela Russomando45, Vahid Salimi46, Pongpun Sawatwong12, Nienke M Scheltema16, Brunhilde Schweiger47, J. Anthony G. Scott10, J. Anthony G. Scott48, Phil Seidenberg49, Kunling Shen50, Rosalyn J. Singleton51, Rosalyn J. Singleton12, Viviana Sotomayor, Tor A. Strand52, Tor A. Strand14, Agustinus Sutanto, Mariam Sylla, Milagritos D. Tapia34, Somsak Thamthitiwat12, Elizabeth Thomas43, Rafal Tokarz53, Claudia Turner54, Marietjie Venter55, Sunthareeya Waicharoen56, Jianwei Wang57, Wanitda Watthanaworawit54, Lay-Myint Yoshida58, Hongjie Yu25, Heather J. Zar38, Harry Campbell1, Harish Nair59, Harish Nair1 
University of Edinburgh1, University of Glasgow2, Johns Hopkins University3, University of Colorado Boulder4, University of the Witwatersrand5, International Military Sports Council6, Aga Khan University7, Medical Research Council8, King George's Medical University9, Kenya Medical Research Institute10, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh11, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention12, Tribhuvan University13, University of Bergen14, University of Barcelona15, Utrecht University16, Emory University17, All India Institute of Medical Sciences18, University of Liverpool19, Boston Children's Hospital20, National Institute of Virology21, University of Zambia22, University of Health Sciences Antigua23, National Health Laboratory Service24, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention25, Austral University26, University of Michigan27, Vanderbilt University28, University of New South Wales29, University of Auckland30, University of Otago31, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala32, University of Jordan33, University of Maryland, Baltimore34, National Scientific and Technical Research Council35, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine36, Pwani University College37, University of Cape Town38, University of Warwick39, Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom40, Tohoku University41, École normale supérieure de Lyon42, John E. Fogarty International Center43, Charité44, Universidad Nacional de Asunción45, Tehran University of Medical Sciences46, Robert Koch Institute47, University of London48, University of New Mexico49, Capital Medical University50, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium51, Innlandet Hospital Trust52, Columbia University53, Mahidol University54, University of Pretoria55, Thailand Ministry of Public Health56, Peking Union Medical College57, Nagasaki University58, Public Health Foundation of India59
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors estimated the incidence and hospital admission rate of RSV-associated acute lower respiratory infection (RSV-ALRI) in children younger than 5 years stratified by age and World Bank income regions.

1,470 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors synthesize the existing evidence that addresses the question: "What are the effects of faculty development interventions on the knowledge, attitudes and skills of teachers in medical education, and on the institutions in which they work?"
Abstract: Background: Preparing healthcare professionals for teaching is regarded as essential to enhancing teaching effectiveness. Although many reports describe various faculty development interventions, there is a paucity of research demonstrating their effectiveness.Objective: To synthesize the existing evidence that addresses the question: “What are the effects of faculty development interventions on the knowledge, attitudes and skills of teachers in medical education, and on the institutions in which they work?”Methods: The search, covering the period 1980–2002, included three databases (Medline, ERIC and EMBASE) and used the keywords: staff development; in-service training; medical faculty; faculty training/development; continuing medical education. Manual searches were also conducted.Articles with a focus on faculty development to improve teaching effectiveness, targeting basic and clinical scientists, were reviewed. All study designs that included outcome data beyond participant satisfaction were accepted....

1,091 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this article, the authors synthesize the existing evidence that addresses the question: "What are the effects of faculty development interventions on the knowledge, attitudes and skills of teachers in medical education, and on the institutions in which they work?"
Abstract: Background: Preparing healthcare professionals for teaching is regarded as essential to enhancing teaching effectiveness. Although many reports describe various faculty development interventions, there is a paucity of research demonstrating their effectiveness.Objective: To synthesize the existing evidence that addresses the question: “What are the effects of faculty development interventions on the knowledge, attitudes and skills of teachers in medical education, and on the institutions in which they work?”Methods: The search, covering the period 1980–2002, included three databases (Medline, ERIC and EMBASE) and used the keywords: staff development; in-service training; medical faculty; faculty training/development; continuing medical education. Manual searches were also conducted.Articles with a focus on faculty development to improve teaching effectiveness, targeting basic and clinical scientists, were reviewed. All study designs that included outcome data beyond participant satisfaction were accepted....

1,080 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper investigated the relationship between theoretical determinants of default risk and actual market premia using linear regression and found that leverage, volatility and the risk free rate are important determinants for credit default swap premia, as predicted by theory.
Abstract: Using a new dataset of bid and offer quotes for credit default swaps, we investigate the relationship between theoretical determinants of default risk and actual market premia using linear regression. These theoretical determinants are firm leverage, volatility and the riskless interest rate. We find that estimated coefficients for these variables are consistent with theory and that the estimates are highly significant both statistically and economically. The explanatory power of the theoretical variables for levels of default swap premia is approximately 60%. The explanatory power for the differences in the premia is approximately 23%. Volatility and leverage by themselves also have substantial explanatory power for credit default swap premia. A principal component analysis of the residuals and the premia shows that there is only weak evidence for a residual common factor and also suggests that the theoretical variables explain a significant amount of the variation in the data. We therefore conclude that leverage, volatility and the riskfree rate are important determinants of credit default swap premia, as predicted by theory.

629 citations


Authors

Showing all 1015 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jesús Egido9569335369
Alberto Ortiz9077573752
Thomas T. Veblen8730622151
Marta Ruiz-Ortega6224214866
Rainer Horn6239814099
Shohei Koide5936913745
Jorge Correale5218911175
Martin O'Flaherty4824515089
Ana Belen Sanz471576673
Sergio Mezzano451399630
José Iriarte441616194
Antonio Lara411656883
Marcelo J. Villar401206136
Óscar Lorenzo40835723
Guillermo Mazzolini371239170
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Valencia
65.6K papers, 1.7M citations

80% related

Complutense University of Madrid
90.2K papers, 2.1M citations

79% related

University of Barcelona
108.5K papers, 3.7M citations

79% related

Autonomous University of Barcelona
80.5K papers, 2.3M citations

79% related

University of California, Irvine
113.6K papers, 5.5M citations

79% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20237
202213
2021130
2020127
2019108
201894