The far-infrared-radio correlation at high redshifts: physical considerations and prospects for the square kilometer array
read more
Citations
A Highly Consistent Framework for the Evolution of the Star-Forming "Main Sequence" from z~0-6
CALIBRATING EXTINCTION-FREE STAR FORMATION RATE DIAGNOSTICS WITH 33 GHz FREE-FREE EMISSION IN NGC 6946
Dusty Star Forming Galaxies at High Redshift
Dusty Star-Forming Galaxies at High Redshift
An ALMA survey of submillimetre galaxies in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South: high-resolution 870 μm source counts
References
Star formation in galaxies along the hubble sequence
Rest-Frame Ultraviolet Spectra of z ∼ 3 Lyman Break Galaxies*
Interpreting the Cosmic Infrared Background: Constraints on the Evolution of the Dust-enshrouded Star Formation Rate
SINGS: The SIRTF Nearby Galaxies Survey
Related Papers (5)
Thermal infrared and nonthermal radio: remarkable correlation in disks of galaxies
Estimating Star Formation Rates from Infrared and Radio Luminosities: The Origin of the Radio-Infrared Correlation
CALIBRATING EXTINCTION-FREE STAR FORMATION RATE DIAGNOSTICS WITH 33 GHz FREE-FREE EMISSION IN NGC 6946
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What causes radio continuum emission from galaxies?
Radio continuum emission from galaxies arises due to a combination of thermal and non-thermal processes primarily associated with the birth and death of young massive stars, respectively.
Q3. How much should the observed nonthermal radio continuum emission be suppressed?
If the intrinsic magnetic fields of LBGs are as large as the minimum energy fields for SMGs (i.e., ∼35 μG,) then the observed nonthermal radio continuum emission should still be suppressed by a factor of ∼2.
Q4. What is the effect of re-acceleration of CR electrons on the radio?
the distributed re-acceleration of CR electrons arising from external interactions such as ram pressure may add significant flux to the observed radio continuum from galaxies (e.g., Murphy et al. 2009b).
Q5. What is the effective cooling timescale for CR electrons due to synchrotron and ?
The effective cooling timescale for CR electrons due to synchrotron and IC losses isτ−1cool = τ−1syn + τ−1IC , (5) which, by combining Equations (2) and (4), the authors can express as(τcoolyr) ∼ 5.7 × 107 ( νc GHz )−1/2 ( B μG )1/2× (UB + Urad 10−12 erg cm−3)−1 .
Q6. What is the effect of using GHz observations to estimate the cosmic star formation history?
When coupled with the additional emission from an AGN, which may appear to place galaxies back on the FIR–radio correlation, it appears that using GHz observations to estimate the cosmic star formation history may lead to increasingly unreliable estimates of star formation rates with increasing redshift.
Q7. What are the terms that are now considered in the literature?
Additional energy-loss terms that may become increasingly important in the case of galaxies hosting strong starbursts are now considered.
Q8. How does the efficiency of SNe explosions affect the kinetic energy of the galaxy?
The efficiency with which the initial energy of SNe explosions is converted into kinetic energy depends on the relative importance of radiation and adiabatic losses.
Q9. How did Bouwens and Morrison estimate the observed-frame radio flux densities?
Corresponding observed-frame radio flux densities were then estimated by first converting the extinction-corrected UV luminosities to IR luminosities following Kennicutt (1998), and then using the FIR–radio correlation assuming a galaxy magnetic field strength of 10 μG.
Q10. What is the UCMB flux density for a bright LIRG?
It is also shown that a moderately bright LIRG at z ∼ 10 should have a 1.4 GHz flux density of ∼40 nJy almost entirely arising from free–free emission.
Q11. How does the stacking analysis compare to the observed UV measurements?
Using a stacking analysis and assuming the local FIR–radio correlation, they find that the radio (1.4 GHz) derived star formation rate is a factor of 1.8 ± 0.4 times larger than that from the observed UV measurements.
Q12. What is the simplest explanation for the escape times of a clumpy galaxi?
if the ISM of such galaxies are typically clumpy, similar to local dwarf irregular galaxies, then escape times should decrease even more (e.g., Murphy et al. 2008).
Q13. What is the ratio of synchrotron to total energy losses for CR electrons?
To keep a fixed ratio between the FIR and radio emission of galaxies requires that the ratio of synchrotron to total energy losses for CR electrons to be nearly constant among each system.
Q14. What is the importance of deep continuum imaging for the realization of KSPs?
While the SKA was initially proposed solely on the basis of H i science, deep continuum imaging is critical for the realization of nearly all of the five established Key Science Projects (KSPs), especially studies of “The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism” and “Galaxy Evolution and Cosmology.”
Q15. How would the strong magnetic fields decay over cosmic time?
these strong magnetic fields would then have to decay considerably over cosmic time to recover the typical strengths observed for galaxies in the local universe.
Q16. What is the average IR/radio ratio for the SMGs in their sample?
Murphy et al. (2009a) also found that the SMGs in their sample to have IR/radio ratios which are, on average, a factor of ∼3.5 lower than the canonical ratio.