Journal ArticleDOI
Tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study
Armando Santoro,Lorenza Rimassa,Ivan Borbath,Bruno Daniele,Stefania Salvagni,Jean-Luc Van Laethem,Hans Van Vlierberghe,Jörg Trojan,Frank T. Kolligs,Alan Weiss,Steven A. Miles,Antonio Gasbarrini,Monica Lencioni,Luca Cicalese,Morris Sherman,Cesare Gridelli,Peter Buggisch,Guido Gerken,Roland M. Schmid,Corrado Boni,Nicola Personeni,Ziad Hassoun,Giovanni Abbadessa,Brian Schwartz,Reinhard von Roemeling,Maria Lamar,Yinpu Chen,Camillo Porta +27 more
TLDR
Tivantinib could provide an option for second-line treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and well-compensated liver cirrhosis, particularly for patients with MET-high tumours.Abstract:
Summary Background Tivantinib (ARQ 197), a selective oral inhibitor of MET, has shown promising antitumour activity in hepatocellular carcinoma as monotherapy and in combination with sorafenib. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods In this completed, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 study, we enrolled patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had progressed on or were unable to tolerate first-line systemic therapy. We randomly allocated patients 2:1 to receive tivantinib (360 mg twice-daily) or placebo until disease progression. The tivantinib dose was amended to 240 mg twice-daily because of high incidence of treatment-emergent grade 3 or worse neutropenia. Randomisation was done centrally by an interactive voice-response system, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and vascular invasion. The primary endpoint was time to progression, according to independent radiological review in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed tumour samples for MET expression with immunohistochemistry (high expression was regarded as ≥2+ in ≥50% of tumour cells). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00988741. Findings 71 patients were randomly assigned to receive tivantinib (38 at 360 mg twice-daily and 33 at 240 mg twice-daily); 36 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo. At the time of analysis, 46 (65%) patients in the tivantinib group and 26 (72%) of those in the placebo group had progressive disease. Time to progression was longer for patients treated with tivantinib (1·6 months [95% CI 1·4–2·8]) than placebo (1·4 months [1·4–1·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·64, 90% CI 0·43–0·94; p=0·04). For patients with MET-high tumours, median time to progression was longer with tivantinib than for those on placebo (2·7 months [95% CI 1·4–8·5] for 22 MET-high patients on tivantinib vs 1·4 months [1·4–1·6] for 15 MET-high patients on placebo; HR 0·43, 95% CI 0·19–0·97; p=0·03). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the tivantinib group were neutropenia (ten patients [14%] vs none in the placebo group) and anaemia (eight [11%] vs none in the placebo group). Eight patients (21%) in the tivantinib 360 mg group had grade 3 or worse neutropenia compared with two (6%) patients in the 240 mg group. Four deaths related to tivantinib occurred from severe neutropenia. 24 (34%) patients in the tivantinib group and 14 (39%) patients in the placebo group had serious adverse events. Interpretation Tivantinib could provide an option for second-line treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and well-compensated liver cirrhosis, particularly for patients with MET-high tumours. Confirmation in a phase 3 trial is needed, with a starting dose of tivantinib 240 mg twice-daily. Funding ArQule, Daiichi Sankyo (Daiichi Sankyo Group).read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Multidisciplinary perspective of hepatocellular carcinoma: A Pacific Northwest experience
Matthew M. Yeh,Raymond S. Yeung,Smith Apisarnthanarax,Renuka Bhattacharya,Carlos Cuevas,William P. Harris,Tony Lim Kiat Hon,Siddharth A. Padia,James O. Park,Kevin M. Riggle,Sayed S. Daoud +10 more
TL;DR: A multidisciplinary perspective of recent advances in basic and clinical understanding of HCC that include: molecular hepatocarcinogenesis, non-invasive diagnostics modalities, diagnostic pathology, surgical modality, transplantation, local therapy and oncological/target therapeutics are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Liver cancer oncogenomics: opportunities and dilemmas for clinical applications
TL;DR: Investigations indicate that a classical oncogene addiction cannot be assumed for primary liver cancer, and hepatocarcinogenesis can be considered a paradigm suitable for individualized medicine.
Journal ArticleDOI
New chemical treatment options in second-line hepatocellular carcinoma: what to do when sorafenib fails?
TL;DR: An updated summary of the preclinical and clinical experience with regorafenib, c-Met inhibitors, cabozantinib and tepotinib, and a checkpoint inhibitor in HCC.
Journal ArticleDOI
Rethinking future development of molecular therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: A bottom-up approach
TL;DR: There is an increasing need to provide new targets and refine selection criteria in HCC clinical trials using molecular readouts of tumor biology and to provide enriched populations using predicted biomarkers of response.
Journal ArticleDOI
Management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: review of current and potential therapies
Asmaa Gomaa,Imam Waked +1 more
TL;DR: Current treatment, ongoing research, and potential future treatments for advanced HCC are reviewed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Elizabeth Eisenhauer,P. Therasse,Jan Bogaerts,Lawrence H. Schwartz,Daniel J. Sargent,Robert Ford,Janet Dancey,S. Arbuck,S. Gwyther,Margaret M. Mooney,Larry Rubinstein,Lalitha K. Shankar,Lori E. Dodd,Robert M. Kaplan,Denis Lacombe,Jaap Verweij +15 more
TL;DR: The revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions, and a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Josep M. Llovet,Sergio Ricci,Vincenzo Mazzaferro,Philip Hilgard,Edward Gane,Jean-Frédéric Blanc,André Cosme de Oliveira,Armando Santoro,Jean-Luc Raoul,Alejandro Forner,Myron Schwartz,Camillo Porta,Stefan Zeuzem,Luigi Bolondi,Tim F. Greten,Peter R. Galle,Jean Francois Seitz,Ivan Borbath,Dieter Häussinger,Tom Giannaris,Minghua Shan,M. Moscovici,D. Voliotis,Jordi Bruix +23 more
TL;DR: In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo.
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Ann-Lii Cheng,Yoon-Koo Kang,Zhendong Chen,Chao Jung Tsao,Shukui Qin,Jun Suk Kim,Rongcheng Luo,Jifeng Feng,Sheng-Long Ye,Tsai Sheng Yang,Jianming Xu,Yan Sun,Houjie Liang,Jiwei Liu,Jiejun Wang,Won Young Tak,Hongming Pan,Karin Burock,Jessie Zou,D. Voliotis,Zhongzhen Guan +20 more
TL;DR: Sorafenib is effective for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in patients from the Asia-Pacific region, and is well tolerated.
Journal Article
[New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)].
Hirokazu Watanabe,Morihito Okada,Yasushi Kaji,Miyako Satouchi,Yozo Sato,Yuichiro Yamabe,Hiroaki Onaya,Masahiro Endo,Miyuki Sone,Yasuaki Arai +9 more
TL;DR: This paper is an overview of the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1. 1), with a focus on updated contents.
Related Papers (5)
Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Josep M. Llovet,Sergio Ricci,Vincenzo Mazzaferro,Philip Hilgard,Edward Gane,Jean-Frédéric Blanc,André Cosme de Oliveira,Armando Santoro,Jean-Luc Raoul,Alejandro Forner,Myron Schwartz,Camillo Porta,Stefan Zeuzem,Luigi Bolondi,Tim F. Greten,Peter R. Galle,Jean Francois Seitz,Ivan Borbath,Dieter Häussinger,Tom Giannaris,Minghua Shan,M. Moscovici,D. Voliotis,Jordi Bruix +23 more
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Ramucirumab Versus Placebo as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following First-Line Therapy With Sorafenib (REACH): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial
Andrew X. Zhu,Joon Oh Park,Baek Yeol Ryoo,Chia Jui Yen,Ronnie T.P. Poon,Davide Pastorelli,Jean-Frédéric Blanc,Hyun Cheol Chung,Ari David Baron,Tulio Eduardo Flesch Pfiffer,Takuji Okusaka,Katerina Kubackova,Jörg Trojan,Javier Sastre,Ian Chau,Shao Chun Chang,Paolo Abada,Ling Yang,Jonathan D. Schwartz,Masatoshi Kudo +19 more
Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Jordi Bruix,Shukui Qin,Philippe Merle,Alessandro Granito,Yi Hsiang Huang,György Bodoky,Marc Pracht,Osamu Yokosuka,Olivier Rosmorduc,Valeriy Breder,René Gerolami,Gianluca Masi,Paul Ross,Tianqiang Song,Jean-Pierre Bronowicki,Isabelle Ollivier-Hourmand,Masatoshi Kudo,Ann-Lii Cheng,Josep M. Llovet,Josep M. Llovet,Josep M. Llovet,Richard S. Finn,Marie Aude Leberre,Annette Baumhauer,Gerold Meinhardt,Guohong Han +25 more