scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Relative survival published in 2014"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The major advances in cancer management that occurred up to 2007 seem to have resulted in improved survival in Europe, although results for lung cancer in some regions (central and eastern Europe) might be affected by overestimation.
Abstract: Summary Background Cancer survival is a key measure of the effectiveness of health-care systems. EUROCARE—the largest cooperative study of population-based cancer survival in Europe—has shown persistent differences between countries for cancer survival, although in general, cancer survival is improving. Major changes in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation occurred in the early 2000s. EUROCARE-5 assesses their effect on cancer survival in 29 European countries. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we analysed data from 107 cancer registries for more than 10 million patients with cancer diagnosed up to 2007 and followed up to 2008. Uniform quality control procedures were applied to all datasets. For patients diagnosed 2000–07, we calculated 5-year relative survival for 46 cancers weighted by age and country. We also calculated country-specific and age-specific survival for ten common cancers, together with survival differences between time periods (for 1999–2001, 2002–04, and 2005–07). Findings 5-year relative survival generally increased steadily over time for all European regions. The largest increases from 1999–2001 to 2005–07 were for prostate cancer (73·4% [95% CI 72·9–73·9] vs 81·7% [81·3–82·1]), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (53·8% [53·3–54·4] vs 60·4% [60·0–60·9]), and rectal cancer (52·1% [51·6–52·6] vs 57·6% [57·1–58·1]). Survival in eastern Europe was generally low and below the European mean, particularly for cancers with good or intermediate prognosis. Survival was highest for northern, central, and southern Europe. Survival in the UK and Ireland was intermediate for rectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, skin melanoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but low for kidney, stomach, ovarian, colon, and lung cancers. Survival for lung cancer in the UK and Ireland was much lower than for other regions for all periods, although results for lung cancer in some regions (central and eastern Europe) might be affected by overestimation. Survival usually decreased with age, although to different degrees depending on region and cancer type. Interpretation The major advances in cancer management that occurred up to 2007 seem to have resulted in improved survival in Europe. Likely explanations of differences in survival between countries include: differences in stage at diagnosis and accessibility to good care, different diagnostic intensity and screening approaches, and differences in cancer biology. Variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, and general health between populations might also have a role. Further studies are needed to fully interpret these findings and how to remedy disparities. Funding Italian Ministry of Health, European Commission, Compagnia di San Paolo Foundation, Cariplo Foundation.

1,601 citations


18 Dec 2014
TL;DR: Triple-negative breast cancers affect younger, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women in areas of low SES, and the tumors were diagnosed at later stage and were more aggressive, and these women had poorer survival regardless of stage.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Tumor markers are becoming increasingly important in breast cancer research because of their impact on prognosis, treatment, and survival, and because of their relation to breast cancer subtypes. The triple-negative phenotype is important because of its relation to the basal-like subtype of breast cancer. METHODS Using the population-based California Cancer Registry data, we identified women diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer between 2010 and 2013. We examined differences between triple-negative breast cancers compared with other breast cancers in relation to age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), stage at diagnosis, tumor grade, and relative survival. RESULTS A total of 670 women were identified as having triple-negative breast cancer and were compared with the 4704 women with other breast cancers. Women with triple-negative breast cancers were significantly more likely to be under age 40 (odds ratio [OR], 1.53), and non-Hispanic black (OR, 1.77) or Hispanic (OR, 1.23). Regardless of stage at diagnosis, women with triple-negative breast cancers had poorer survival than those with other breast cancers, and non-Hispanic black women with late-stage triple-negative cancer had the poorest survival, with a 5-year relative survival of only 14%. CONCLUSIONS Triple-negative breast cancers affect younger, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women in areas of low SES. The tumors were diagnosed at later stage and were more aggressive, and these women had poorer survival regardless of stage. In addition, non-Hispanic black women with late-stage triple-negative breast cancer had the poorest survival of any comparable group.

390 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The report by Wanqing Chen and colleagues not only offers an in depth picture of cancer incidence and mortality in China in year 2010, but also meticulously presents the quality control process that have led to data selection.
Abstract: The first available data on cancer occurrence in China mainland dates back to 1975 when data from the Cancer Registry of Shanghai were accepted and included in the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. IV (CI5C) edited by John Waterhouse, Calum Muir, Kim Shanmugaratnam, and Jean Powell in 1982 (1). This scientific endeavour was paralleled by the publication of a valuable Atlas of Cancer Mortality just 1 year before in 1981 (2,3). Edited both in Chinese and English by the National Cancer Control Office of the Ministry of Health and the Nanjing Institute of Geography of the Chinese Academy of Sciences was based on a nation-wide cancer mortality survey. Further highlights on cancer mortality was offered to the international public some years after with an analysis of emerging trends in cancer mortality from 1987 to 1999 (4). That work took a picture of a fast changing China, with decreasing cancer occurrence cancer in rural China and new emerging trends in urban China. But mortality could offer only a partial insight on the changing cancer epidemics and incidence was much needed, although the limited coverage of cancer registration in China was exploited at its best for studying cancer epidemiology and data from the Shanghai and Hong King registries were included in international comparisons of cancer incidence trends (5). Since then several registries followed, up to the 12 accepted for the last published Vol. X of CI5C. And now, cancer registration is a widespread national effort that comes back from earlier years and can count on a National organization [the National Central Cancer Registry (NCCR)] that coordinates efforts, check quality and provide assistance. Data published in the Vol X of CI5C, with those to 12 registries from China, cover the period 2003-2007 and next publication is expected not earlier than 2016. It is therefore vital to have intermediate reports as this one describing situation in the fast changing China of year 2010. The report by Wanqing Chen and colleagues (6) not only offers us an in depth picture of cancer incidence and mortality in China in year 2010, but also meticulously presents the quality control process that have led to data selection. Although apparently marginal, this part of the work is highly valuable because reassures the readers about the final quality of presented results. And we can only imagine the painful process that had led to leave out registries that did not comply with the stringent quality criteria here adopted. The resulting number of registries that qualified with their data for this publication is 145, covering an impressive population of more than 158 million inhabitants (about 12% of the whole Chinese population). Comparing quality indicators, we can see that the percentage of death certificate only (DCO), i.e., those cases notified to the registries only by means of a death certificate (see the 4th Table, in Chen et al.) (6), are quite low and comparable to the 12 registries in CI5C or other registries across the world. On the contrary, the percentages of microscopic verification still do not reach that observed in other registries in Europe, Oceania and North America and in the 12 selected in CI5C. However, this indicator can show either a difficulty of the registry in finding information of the diagnostic process or the lack of such good practice in the diagnostic and clinical process. The general picture, emerging from this report, reflects the strong contrast between a rural and an urban China, with opposite patterns of burden of cancer. While in urban China lung cancer in men (ASR 51.2) compared to incidence in Europe (45.6 in EU28 in 2005) or North America (SEER9 45.8 in CI5C Vol X), cancer burden in rural China is dominated by stomach cancer both in men (ASR 39.5 vs. 29.6 in urban China) and in women (ASR 15.5 vs. 12.0 in urban China), by oesophagus (ASR 23.3 in men and 9.8 in women vs. 12.9 and 3.9 in urban areas) and by liver cancer (ASR 32.7 in men and 10.8 in women vs. 23.3 and 8.5 in urban areas). Most notably rates of liver cancer are among the highest in the world, only paralleled by those in Korea, Japan, Thailand and Naples (Italy). In women, although breast cancer is the most common cancer, its incidence is much lower (ASR 30.5 in urban and 20.8 in rural areas) than in North America (ASR 89.2) or Europe (ASR 77.7). Also prostate cancer is very low even in urban areas (ASR 6.1), and in rural areas did not even score among the top ten cancers. Although the authors announces the incoming use of Chinese registries data for an international cooperative survival analysis (CONCORD II) (7), some inference on survival patterns can be sought comparing mortality to incidence ratio (MIR). This index, although traditionally used as an indirect measure of incidence completeness, can also be used as a rough estimate of survival. More precisely it has been suggested that its complement (1-MIR) is a valid proxy of 5-year relative survival (8). A first inspection of the 1-MIR index for some cancers, shows that survival from cancer with less favourable prognosis is in China aligned with those of western countries, while possibly a lower survival for cancer with better prognosis. However, these results should be confirmed later with formal and full implemented survival studies. In no doubt these important results will inform and help planning future actions in the fight against cancer, both on the side of eliminating and reducing risk factors, but also detecting earlier cancer, improving care and finally alleviating the suffering of those who will fail under the burden of cancer.

323 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Survival decreased with advancing age, and increased with time only slightly in patients aged 75 years or older, although a 10% increase in survival occurred in elderly patients with follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Abstract: Summary Background More effective treatments have become available for haematological malignancies from the early 2000s, but few large-scale population-based studies have investigated their effect on survival. Using EUROCARE data, and HAEMACARE morphological groupings, we aimed to estimate time trends in population-based survival for 11 lymphoid and myeloid malignancies in 20 European countries, by region and age. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we included patients (aged 15 years and older) diagnosed with haematological malignancies, diagnosed up to Dec 31, 2007, and followed up to Dec 31, 2008. We used data from the 30 cancer registries (across 20 countries) that provided continuous incidence and good quality data from 1992 to 2007. We used a hybrid approach to estimate age-standardised and age-specific 5-year relative survival, for each malignancy, overall and for five regions (UK, and northern, central, southern, and eastern Europe), and four 3-year periods (1997–99, 2000–02, 2003–05, 2006–08). For each malignancy, we also estimated the relative excess risk of death during the 5 years after diagnosis, by period, age, and region. Findings We analysed 560 444 cases. From 1997–99 to 2006–08 survival increased for most malignancies: the largest increases were for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (42·0% [95% CI 40·7–43·4] to 55·4% [54·6–56·2], p Interpretation These trends are encouraging. Widespread use of new and more effective treatment probably explains much of the increased survival. However, the persistent differences in survival across Europe suggest variations in the quality of care and availability of the new treatments. High-resolution studies that collect data about stage at diagnosis and treatments for representative samples of cases could provide further evidence of treatment effectiveness and explain geographic variations in survival. Funding Compagnia di San Paolo, Fondazione Cariplo, European Commission, and Italian Ministry of Health.

233 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Insight is provided into the incidence and survival patterns of gliomas in the Netherlands diagnosed in adult patients during the time period 1989-2010, with a focus on glioblastoma and low-gradegliomas.

184 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Incidence rates for MCC in Queensland are at least double those of any that have been previously published elsewhere in the world, and it is likely that Queensland's combination of a predominantly white population, outdoor lifestyle, and exposure to sunlight has played a role in this unwanted result.
Abstract: Importance Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon but highly invasive form of skin cancer. The mechanisms that cause MCC are yet to be fully determined. Objectives To compare the incidence and survival rates of MCC in Queensland, Australia, known to be a high-risk area, with MCC incidence and survival elsewhere in the world. We also analyzed incidence trends and differences in survival by key demographic and clinical characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study of population-based administrative data for MCC collected by the Queensland Cancer Registry and supplemented with detailed histopathologic data. Deidentified records were obtained of all Queensland residents diagnosed as having MCC during the period from 1993 to 2010. A subsample of histopathologic records were reviewed by a senior dermatopathologist to determine the potential for misclassification. A total of 879 eligible cases of MCC were included in the study. Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence rates were directly age standardized to the 2000 United States Standard Population. Trends were examined using Joinpoint software with results expressed in terms of the annual percentage change. The period method was used to calculate 5-year relative survival, and adjusted hazard ratios were obtained from multivariate Poisson models. Results There were 340 cases of MCC diagnosed in Queensland between 2006 and 2010, corresponding to an incidence rate of 1.6 per 100 000 population. Men (2.5 per 100 000) had higher incidence than women (0.9 per 100 000), and rates peaked at 20.7 per 100 000 for persons 80 years or older. The overall incidence of MCC increased by an average of 2.6% per year from 1993 onwards. Relative survival was 41% after 5 years, with significantly better survival found for those younger than 70 years at diagnosis (56%-60%), those with tumors on the face or ears (51%), and those with stage I lesions (49%). Conclusions and Relevance Incidence rates for MCC in Queensland are at least double those of any that have been previously published elsewhere in the world. It is likely that Queensland’s combination of a predominantly white population, outdoor lifestyle, and exposure to sunlight has played a role in this unwanted result. Interventions are required to increase awareness of MCC among clinicians and the public.

141 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cutaneous melanomas have a markedly worse survival than CM and aggressive locoregional management appears to be insufficient for their control, and studies of systemic therapy are warranted regardless of the extent of disease at presentation.
Abstract: Extracutaneous melanomas are poorly characterized tumors that include ocular (OM), mucosal (MM) and leptomeningeal melanomas, often lacking standardized staging and treatment guidelines. We analyzed cases of cutaneous melanoma (CM, N = 219,890), OM (N = 7,069) and MM (N = 2,755) of different anatomical origins, diagnosed between 1988 and 2010, recorded in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Relative survival was studied in patients grouped by summary stage classification (localized, regional or distant disease) and in multivariate models adjusting for varying distribution of baseline factors. Unlike in CM, the incidence rate in MM increased exponentially with age. Five-year relative survival was significantly worse for OM (78%) and for most mucosal sites (aggregate 34%, range 3–69%) compared with CM (89%). The differences between primary sites were particularly pronounced in localized disease, with a hazard ratio of 5.7 for OM, 4.3–9.0 for external genital or oral cavity MM and 19.8–90.4 for other mucosal locations. Melanomas of the pharynx, gastrointestinal, urinary tract and vagina had poor outcomes regardless of clinical stage. In contrast to CM, there was no evidence of improved survival in OM and MM during the study period. A substantial proportion of patients with operable OM or MM underwent radical organ resections (13–88% depending on site and stage) or perioperative radiotherapy (0–66%). In conclusion, extracutaneous melanomas have a markedly worse survival than CM and aggressive locoregional management appears to be insufficient for their control. Because of poor outcomes in MM, studies of systemic therapy are warranted regardless of the extent of disease at presentation.

135 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
15 Feb 2014-Cancer
TL;DR: This study sought to determine the difference in timing from presentation with hematuria to diagnosis of bladder cancer in women versus men.
Abstract: There were an estimated 73,510 incident cases of bladder cancer in the United States in 2012, with 55,600 and 17,910 cases in males and females, respectively (3.1 to 1 ratio).1,2 Of the 14,880 estimated deaths from bladder cancer, 10,510 were men and 4,370 women (2.4 to 1 ratio),2 demonstrating the disproportionate mortality:incidence ratio for women that is well-documented in the literature.3–7 Specifically, a study by the EUROCARE Working Group8 demonstrated a 5% absolute decreased 5-year survival for women compared to men, controlling for age and expected mortality. This phenomenon was unique to bladder cancer, as the EUROCARE study found that women appeared to have a significant survival advantage for cancers of the head and neck, esophagus, stomach, liver, and pancreas. The mechanisms for increased mortality in women with bladder cancer are not completely understood. Although advanced stage of presentation has been hypothesized, a review of the SEER database by Mungan et al. demonstrated a 5-year overall relative survival advantage for males across all stages of disease.5 Studies evaluating disparities in aggressive treatment are mixed and do not appear to explain the disparity in prognosis,9,10 nor does in-hospital mortality following aggressive therapy.11 However, for both men and women, it has been established that delays in diagnosis and treatment (specifically, a delay >6 months for diagnosis12 and >12 weeks from diagnosis to cystectomy13–16) adversely impact survival. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that relative to men, women may be at greater risk of delays in diagnosis17 and presentation with advanced disease.18 Gross hematuria is the most prognostic clinical sign of underlying urologic malignancy, with urothelial cell carcinoma present in 13% to 34.5% of cases.19,20 Microscopic hematuria is associated with malignancy in 0.5% to 10.5% of cases.20–23 As such, even in cases of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, the American Urological Association Guidelines recommend a thorough work-up for malignancy, consisting of upper tract imaging and cystoscopy, following rule-out of obvious benign causes.24 In patients 40–59 years of age, gross hematuria carries a positive predictive value (PPV) for urologic cancer that is actually higher for women than men (6.4% vs. 3.6%).25 Nonetheless, women presenting with hematuria are less likely to see a urologist, with one study demonstrating men to be 65% more likely to receive a urologic referral.26 This is thought to be related to the differential assumption of a benign diagnosis in women.27 A recent study of patients ultimately diagnosed with bladder cancer found women to be less likely to have undergone prompt urologic consultation for their presenting symptoms and were more likely to have received 3 or more courses of antibiotics.28 If women are more likely to die from bladder cancer than men at any stage as the literature suggests,8 and that delay in diagnosis and treatment adversely impacts survival,12,14–16 timely diagnosis of bladder cancer in women is of utmost importance. Our study aims to evaluate gender disparities in the timing from clinical presentation with hematuria to the diagnosis of bladder cancer in a large nationwide cohort.

124 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cancer survival is lower for Indigenous than other Australians, for all cancers combined and many individual cancer sites, although more accurate recording of Indigenous status by cancer registers is required before the extent of this disadvantage can be known with certainty.
Abstract: Background National cancer survival statistics are available for the total Australian population but not Indigenous Australians, although their cancer mortality rates are known to be higher than those of other Australians. We aimed to validate analysis methods and report cancer survival rates for Indigenous Australians as the basis for regular national reporting.

116 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Variation in 10‐year cancer survival by site was wide, from 5% for pancreatic cancer to 95% for female thyroid cancer, and conditional 5‐year survival for most cancer sites increased according to years, whereas those for liver cancer and multiple myeloma did not increase.
Abstract: Although we usually report 5-year cancer survival using population-based cancer registry data, nowadays many cancer patients survive longer and need to be followed-up for more than 5 years. Long-term cancer survival figures are scarce in Japan. Here we report 10-year cancer survival and conditional survival using an established statistical approach. We received data on 1 387 489 cancer cases from six prefectural population-based cancer registries in Japan, diagnosed between 1993 and 2009 and followed-up for at least 5 years. We estimated the 10-year relative survival of patients who were followed-up between 2002 and 2006 using period analysis. Using this 10-year survival, we also calculated the conditional 5-year survival for cancer survivors who lived for some years after diagnosis. We reported 10-year survival and conditional survival of 23 types of cancer for 15–99-year-old patients and four types of cancer for children (0–14 years old) and adolescent and young adults (15–29 years old) patients by sex. Variation in 10-year cancer survival by site was wide, from 5% for pancreatic cancer to 95% for female thyroid cancer. Approximately 70–80% of children and adolescent and young adult cancer patients survived for more than 10 years. Conditional 5-year survival for most cancer sites increased according to years, whereas those for liver cancer and multiple myeloma did not increase. We reported 10-year cancer survival and conditional survival using population-based cancer registries in Japan. It is important for patients and clinicians to report these relevant figures using population-based data.

114 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pathologic nodal evaluation should be considered even for patients with small primary MCC tumors, and the number of involved nodes is strongly predictive of survival and may help improve prognostic accuracy and management.
Abstract: Background The effects of primary tumor size on nodal involvement and of number of involved nodes on survival have not, to our knowledge, been examined in a national database of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Objective We sought to analyze a retrospective cohort of patients with MCC from the largest US national database to assess the relationships between these clinical parameters and survival. Methods A total of 8044 MCC cases in the National Cancer Data Base were analyzed. Results There was a 14% risk of regional nodal involvement for 0.5-cm tumors that increased to 25% for 1.7-cm (median-sized) tumors and to more than 36% for tumors 6 cm or larger. The number of involved nodes was strongly predictive of survival (0 nodes, 76% 5-year relative survival; 1 node, 50%; 2 nodes, 47%; 3-5 nodes, 42%; and ≥6 nodes, 24%; P Limitations The National Cancer Data Base does not capture disease-specific survival. Hence, relative survival was calculated by comparing overall survival with age- and sex-matched US population data. Conclusion Pathologic nodal evaluation should be considered even for patients with small primary MCC tumors. The number of involved nodes is strongly predictive of survival and may help improve prognostic accuracy and management.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A simple way of defining cut-off points for continuous variables and the appropriate and inappropriate uses of the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression models is described.
Abstract: The widespread availability of statistical packages has undoubtedly helped hematologists worldwide in the analysis of their data, but has also led to the inappropriate use of statistical methods. In this article, we review some basic concepts of survival analysis and also make recommendations about how and when to perform each particular test using SPSS, Stata and R. In particular, we describe a simple way of defining cut-off points for continuous variables and the appropriate and inappropriate uses of the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression models. We also provide practical advice on how to check the proportional hazards assumption and briefly review the role of relative survival and multiple imputation.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Over the past 4 decades, age-specific survival in patients with ESRD has improved, but has not kept pace with that of the general US population.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Differences in cancer survival for patients diagnosed with one of the 25 most common cancer sites in Germany in 1997–2006 are analyzed to indicate a potential for improving cancer care and survival in Germany.
Abstract: Although socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival have been demonstrated both within and between countries, evidence on the variation of the inequalities over time past diagnosis is sparse. Furthermore, no comprehensive analysis of socioeconomic differences in cancer survival in Germany has been conducted. Therefore, we analyzed variations in cancer survival for patients diagnosed with one of the 25 most common cancer sites in 1997-2006 in ten population-based cancer registries in Germany (covering 32 million inhabitants). Patients were assigned a socioeconomic status according to the district of residence at diagnosis. Period analysis was used to derive 3-month, 5-year and conditional 1-year and 5-year age-standardized relative survival for 2002-2006 for each deprivation quintile in Germany. Relative survival of patients living in the most deprived district was compared to survival of patients living in all other districts by model-based period analysis. For 21 of 25 cancer sites, 5-year relative survival was lower in the most deprived districts than in all other districts combined. The median relative excess risk of death over the 25 cancer sites decreased from 1.24 in the first 3 months to 1.16 in the following 9 months to 1.08 in the following 4 years. Inequalities persisted after adjustment for stage. These major regional socioeconomic inequalities indicate a potential for improving cancer care and survival in Germany. Studies on individual-level patient data with access to treatment information should be conducted to examine the reasons for these socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in more detail.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Differences in survival by age at diagnosis, treatment pattern, and location of tumor in the brain are confirmed, contributing to understanding of these tumors and may stimulate research leading to improved treatment of this devastating childhood disease.
Abstract: Results. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.08). Incidence rates did not significantly vary by sex, race, or ethnicity. Age had a strong effect on incidence rate, with highest incidence among children ,1 year, and decreasing incidence with increasing age. The 6-month, 1-year, and 5-year relative survival rates for all ages were 65.0%, 46.8%, and 28.3%, respectively. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor can occur anywhere in the CNS, but supratentorial tumors were more common with increasing age. Conclusion. We confirm differences in survival by age at diagnosis, treatment pattern, and location of tumor in the brain. This contributes to our understanding of these tumors and may stimulate research leading to improved treatment of this devastating childhood disease.

Journal ArticleDOI
27 Jan 2014-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: Survival for adults with ALL continues to be low compared with that for children, but a substantial increase in 5-year survival estimates was seen from 2002 to 2006 in both Germany and the US.
Abstract: Background Adulthood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare disease. In contrast to childhood ALL, survival for adults with ALL is poor. Recently, new protocols, including use of pediatric protocols in young adults, have improved survival in clinical trials. Here, we examine population level survival in Germany and the United States (US) to gain insight into the extent to which changes in clinical trials have translated into better survival on the population level. Methods Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the US and 11 cancer registries in Germany. Patients age 15–69 diagnosed with ALL were included. Period analysis was used to estimate 5-year relative survival (RS). Results Overall 5-year RS was estimated at 43.4% for Germany and 35.5% for the US (p = 0.004), with a decrease in survival with increasing age. Survival was higher in Germany than the US for men (43.6% versus 37.7%, p = 0.002) but not for women (42.4% versus 40.3%, p>0.1). Five-year RS estimates increased in Germany and the US between 2002 and 2006 by 11.8 and 7.3 percent units, respectively (p = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusions Survival for adults with ALL continues to be low compared with that for children, but a substantial increase in 5-year survival estimates was seen from 2002 to 2006 in both Germany and the US. The reasons for the survival differences between both countries require clarification.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: AYA survival for breast cancer and leukemia remain poor as compared with younger and older survivors, and research is needed to address disparities and improve survival in this age group.
Abstract: Adolescent and young adults (AYAs) face challenges in having their cancers recognized, diagnosed, treated, and monitored. Monitoring AYA cancer survival is of interest because of the lack of improvement in outcome previously documented for these patients as compared with younger and older patient outcomes. AYA patients 15–39 years old, diagnosed during 2000–2008 with malignant cancers were selected from the SEER 17 registries data. Selected cancers were analyzed for incidence and five-year relative survival by histology, stage, and receptor subtypes. Hazard ratios were estimated for cancer death risk among younger and older ages relative to the AYA group. AYA survival was worse for female breast cancer (regardless of estrogen receptor status), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AYA survival for AML was lowest for a subtype associated with a mutation of the nucleophosmin 1 gene (NPM1). AYA survival for breast cancer and leukemia remain poor as compared with younger and older survivors. Research is needed to address disparities and improve survival in this age group.

Journal ArticleDOI
10 Mar 2014-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: Dialysis survival has increased during the past 20 years, and PD survival since 2000 has been better than HD, overall and for all subgroups.
Abstract: Introduction Epidemiological studies consistently show an initial survival advantage for PD patients compared to HD. It has recently been suggested that this is due to the fact that many HD patients are referred late, and start dialysis on an acute, in-patient basis. The present study was performed to investigate (1) whether, and if so, how, PD and HD prognosis had changed in recent years, (2) whether a potential survival advantage of PD versus HD is constant over dialysis duration, and (3) whether differences in prognosis could be explained by patient age, renal diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy, or mode of dialysis initiation.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although survival increased greatly for nHw with myeloma between 1998–2001 and 2006–2009, smaller increases were observed for people of other ethnic groups, suggesting that ethnic minorities may not have benefited from newer treatments to the same extent as nHW patients have.
Abstract: Survival for patients with multiple myeloma has increased during the first decade of the 21st century. However, it is unknown whether the improvements in survival have extended equally in all ethnic groups. Using data from the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, we assessed trends in survival and disease-related mortality for patients with myeloma by ethnic group, including non-Hispanic whites (nHw), African-Americans (AA), Hispanics and people of Asian and Pacific Islander descent (API) from 1998–2001 to 2006–2009. Overall, age adjusted 5-year relative survival increased, from 35.6% in 1998–2001 to 44% in 2006–2009. The greatest improvements were observed for patients aged 15–49, for whom survival increased by + 16.8% units for nHw and + 14.4% units for AA, whereas improvement was less pronounced and not statistically significant in Hispanics and API. Excess mortality hazard ratios were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.33) for AA and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.11–1.41...

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article extends the general framework of parametric survival models proposed by Crowther and Lambert, to incorporate relative survival, and robust and cluster robust standard errors, and illustrates the use of restricted cubic splines, modelled on the log hazard scale, to provide a highly flexible survival modelling framework.
Abstract: Parametric survival models are being increasingly used as an alternative to the Cox model in biomedical research. Through direct modelling of the baseline hazard function, we can gain greater understanding of the risk profile of patients over time, obtaining absolute measures of risk. Commonly used parametric survival models, such as the Weibull, make restrictive assumptions of the baseline hazard function, such as monotonicity, which is often violated in clinical datasets. In this article, we extend the general framework of parametric survival models proposed by Crowther and Lambert (Journal of Statistical Software 53:12, 2013), to incorporate relative survival, and robust and cluster robust standard errors. We describe the general framework through three applications to clinical datasets, in particular, illustrating the use of restricted cubic splines, modelled on the log hazard scale, to provide a highly flexible survival modelling framework. Through the use of restricted cubic splines, we can derive the cumulative hazard function analytically beyond the boundary knots, resulting in a combined analytic/numerical approach, which substantially improves the estimation process compared with only using numerical integration. User-friendly Stata software is provided, which significantly extends parametric survival models available in standard software.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To explore the trends and age characteristics of vulval cancer incidence, mortality, survival and stage of disease, a large number of patients diagnosed with the disease in the last decade were over the age of 50.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results showed that 5-year relative survival after osteoporotic hip fracture was below those of the general populations and was comparable with some cancers such as thyroid and breast cancer.
Abstract: Context: Osteoporotic hip fracture is known to be associated with excess mortality. The 1-year mortality rate after hip fracture is known to reach up to ∼20%, similar to that of cancer. However, there was no study that compared cancer survival. Recently, relative survival has been used to present a prognosis for a particular disease. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the 5-year relative survival after osteoporotic hip fracture with those of general population and cancer patients. Design, Setting, and Patients: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 727 patients who were treated for osteoporotic hip fractures from 2003 to 2009. Intervention: Intervention was hip fracture surgery. Main Outcome Measure: Five-year relative survival after fracture was estimated and was compared with survival in the general population and in cancer patients. Relative survival of 100% would reflect no excess mortality associated with the hip fracture compared with the general population. Results: Cu...

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The incidence rate of vulvar cancer continued to increase in U.S. and Canada while its two- and five-year relative survival ratios gradually decreased for all age groups over the last few decades.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Improvement was significant for leukaemia, both myeloid and lymphoid, central nervous system tumours (ependymoma) and neuroblastoma, and the risk of death decreased by 20% between 2000–2002 and 2006–2008.
Abstract: This paper reports the latest survival data for French childhood cancer patients at the national level. Data from the two French National Registries of Childhood Cancer (Haematopoietic Malignancies and Solid Tumours) were used to describe survival outcomes for 15,479 children diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2008 in mainland France. The overall survival was 91.7% at 1 year, 86.9% at 2 years and 81.6% at 5 years. Relative survival did not differ from overall survival even for infants. Survival was lower among infants for lymphoblastic leukaemia and astrocytoma, but higher for neuroblastoma. For all cancers considered together, 5-year survival increased from 79.5% in the first (2000-2002) diagnostic period to 83.2% in the last (2006-2008) period. The improvement was significant for leukaemia, both myeloid and lymphoid, central nervous system tumours (ependymoma) and neuroblastoma. The results remained valid in the multivariate analysis, and, for all cancers combined, the risk of death decreased by 20% between 2000-2002 and 2006-2008. The figures are consistent with various international estimates and are the result of progress in treatment regimens and collaborative clinical trials. The challenge for the French registries is now to study the long-term follow-up of survivors to estimate the incidence of long-term morbidities and adverse effects of treatments.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The objective was to evaluate incidence, organized by patient demographics, as well as long‐term survival trends of this malignancy using a population‐based database.
Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis Laryngeal chondrosarcoma (LC) is a rare entity, reportedly comprising less than 1% of all laryngeal tumors. Consequently, the incidence and survival of patients with this slow-growing tumor has been difficult to study. Our objective was to evaluate incidence, organized by patient demographics, as well as long-term survival trends of this malignancy using a population-based database. Study Design Retrospective analysis of the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Methods The SEER database was searched for patients diagnosed with LC between 1973 and 2010. Data analyzed included patient demographics, incidence, treatment modality, and survival. Results One-hundred and forty-three cases were identified, representing 0.2% of all laryngeal tumors. Median age at diagnosis was 61.7 years. Men and women constituted 76.2% and 23.8% of patients, respectively. Tumors were locally invasive with 37.7% T4 disease and infrequent regional and distant metastases. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year disease-specific survival for LC was 96.5%, 88.6%, and 84.8%, respectively, compared to 88.3%, 68.2%, and 59.3%, respectively for patients with all other laryngeal tumors (P values < 0.01). Relative survival was 94.9% at 1 year, 88.5% at 5 years, and 88.4% at 10 years. Conclusions This analysis represents the largest LC study sample to date, allowing for evaluation of incidence and long-term survival. LC occurs infrequently, is locally invasive, but only rarely metastasizes. Prognosis for LC is significantly better than for other laryngeal malignancies. Level of Evidence 2b. Laryngoscope, 124:1877–1881, 2014

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the reduction and elimination of racial survival disparity among African American men (AAM; high-risk group) compared with European American Men (EAM; intermediate risk group) during the PSA testing era compared with the pre-PSA era strongly supports the use of PSA test in AAM.
Abstract: Background: There is continuing controversy about prostate cancer testing and the recent American Urological Association guidelines. We hypothesize that the reduction and elimination of racial survival disparity among African American men (AAM; high-risk group) compared with European American men (EAM; intermediate-risk group) during the PSA testing era compared with the pre-PSA era strongly supports the use of PSA testing in AAM. Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to investigate relative survival disparities between AAM and EAM. To evaluate pre-PSA testing era, we selected malignant first primary prostate cancer in AAM and EAM, all stages, diagnosed during 1973–1994. To evaluate relative survival disparities in the current PSA testing era, we selected malignant first primary local, regional, and distant stage prostate cancers diagnosed during 1998–2005 to calculate 5-year relative survival rates. Results: Age-adjusted 5-year relative survival of prostate cancer diagnosed during 1973–1994 in the national SEER data revealed significantly shorter survival for AAM compared with EAM ( P < 0.0001). The SEER-based survival analysis from 1995 to 2005 indicated no statistical difference in relative survival rates between AAM and EAM by year of diagnosis of local, regional, or distant stage prostate cancer. Conclusion: We conclude that the elimination of prostate cancer racial disparity of local, regional, and metastatic prostate cancer relative survival in the current PSA testing era compared with pre-PSA era as an endpoint to test PSA efficacy as a marker for prostate cancer diagnosis is evidence for aggressive testing of AAM. Impact: Evidence for screening AAM. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(8); 1505–11. ©2014 AACR . This article is featured in Highlights of This Issue, [p. 1443][1] [1]: /lookup/volpage/23/1443?iss=8

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The differential effect of disease between sexes is small, yet males have decreased survival compared to females with SSc, and a relative survival analysis compared SSc survival to the general population.
Abstract: Objective. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has a female predominance, however, little is understood about the effect of sex on SSc manifestations and survival. The objectives of our study were to evaluate differences in disease manifestations, and survival rates between males and females with SSc. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of the Toronto Scleroderma Program was conducted to evaluate sex-based differences in disease manifestations and survival. A relative survival analysis compared SSc survival to the general population. Results. There were 959 patients (791 females, 168 males) identified, with a female:male ratio of 4.7:1. Males more frequently had diffuse SSc [45% vs 30%, relative risk (RR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.18–1.75] and interstitial lung disease (ILD; 41% vs 33%, RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.52). There were 324 deaths (65 males, 259 females). Males had increased unadjusted mortality compared to females (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.19–2.06). In an adjusted model including immunosuppressive use, male sex (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06–1.85), ILD (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.26–1.98), and older age at diagnosis (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06) were independently associated with increased mortality, whereas the limited subtype (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49–0.77) and anticentromere antibodies (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49–0.98) were independently associated with decreased mortality. Male sex was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.16, p = 0.003) in patients with SSc above that observed for males in the general population. Conclusion. The differential effect of disease between sexes is small, yet males have decreased survival compared to females with SSc.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The overall survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent reoperations increased with decreasing postoperative residual tumor volumes, and for patients meeting prognostic criteria for reoperation, the surgical goal should be to minimize residual tumor volume to maximize overall survival.
Abstract: Object Maximal safe tumor resection is part of the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The role of reoperation in the care of patients with recurrent glioblastoma is less clear, and less than a quarter of patients undergo a second surgery. Previous studies have identified preoperative variables associated with the improved survival of patients following reoperation, and guidelines for the selection of patients for reoperation have been devised and validated. In this study, the authors analyzed the relative survival benefit of maximal safe tumor removal in a series of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who all underwent reoperation. Methods In this longitudinal study, the clinical and radiological data of 97 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma were prospectively collected. Multiple regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier plotting were performed to identify pre- and postoperative clinical and radiological variables associated with increased s...

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Dec 2014-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: Efforts to improve outcomes from sepsis should examine longer term outcomes than the traditional primary endpoints of 28-day and 90-day mortality.
Abstract: Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of death in intensive care units and is increasing in incidence. Current trials of novel therapeutic approaches for sepsis focus on 28-day mortality as the primary outcome measure, but excess mortality may extend well beyond this time period. Methods: We used relative survival analysis to examine excess mortality in a cohort of 1,028 patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital with sepsis during 2007–2008, over the first 5 years of follow up. Expected survival was estimated using the Ederer II method, using Australian life tables as the reference population. Cumulative and interval specific relative survival were estimated by age group, sex, sepsis severity and Indigenous status. Results : Patients were followed for a median of 4.5 years (range 0–5.2). Of the 1028 patients, the mean age was 46.9 years, 52% were male, 228 (22.2%) had severe sepsis and 218 (21%) died during the follow up period. Mortality based on cumulative relative survival exceeded that of the reference population for the first 2 years post admission in the whole cohort and for the first 3 years in the subgroup with severe sepsis. Independent predictors of mortality over the whole follow up period were male sex, Indigenous Australian ethnicity, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sepsis-related organ dysfunction at presentation. Conclusions: The mortality rate of patients hospitalised with sepsis exceeds that of the general population until 2 years post admission. Efforts to improve outcomes from sepsis should examine longer term outcomes than the traditional primary endpoints of 28-day and 90-day mortality.