P
Paul J. van Diest
Researcher at Utrecht University
Publications - 514
Citations - 22750
Paul J. van Diest is an academic researcher from Utrecht University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 70, co-authored 459 publications receiving 18892 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul J. van Diest include University Medical Center Utrecht & VU University Medical Center.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and -2α in whole-mount prostate histology: Relation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and Gleason score
Alie Borren,Greetje Groenendaal,Petra van der Groep,Maaike R. Moman,Arto E. Boeken Kruger,Uulke A. van der Heide,Trudy N. Jonges,Paul J. van Diest,Marco van Vulpen,Marielle E.P. Philippens +9 more
TL;DR: In this whole-mount prostate cancer study, larger prostate tumors showed frequently high HIF-2α expression, suggesting that larger tumors are clinically most relevant, and HIF expression may function as a biomarker to guide boost dose prescription.
Journal ArticleDOI
Tubal and ovarian pathways to pelvic epithelial cancer: a pathological perspective
Journal ArticleDOI
Microvessel density and p53 in detecting cervical cancer by FDG PET in cases of suspected recurrence.
Astrid A.M. van der Veldt,Lotty Hooft,Lotty Hooft,Paul J. van Diest,Johannes Berkhof,M. R. Buist,Emile F.I. Comans,Otto S. Hoekstra,Carla F. M. Molthoff +8 more
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that microvessel density and p53 profiles could be important in pre-selecting cervical cancer patients for detection of recurrence by FDG PET.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ex vivo feasibility study of endoscopic intraductal laser ablation of the breast
TL;DR: The objective was to determine the feasibility and safety of breast endoscopic thulium laser ablation for treatment of intraductal neoplasia.
Journal ArticleDOI
Grading variation in 2,934 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the effect of laboratory- and pathologist-specific feedback reports
Carmen van Dooijeweert,Paul J. van Diest,Inge O. Baas,Elsken van der Wall,Ivette A. G. Deckers +4 more
TL;DR: A promising decrease in grading variation was observed after laboratory-specific feedback for DCIS grades II-III, while this was not observed forDCIS grade I, and nationwide consensus on a classification, and training of (expert breast) pathologists may help to further improve grading standardization.