scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Thorgeir E. Thorgeirsson published in 2010"


Journal ArticleDOI
Thorgeir E. Thorgeirsson1, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson2, Ida Surakka3, Ida Surakka4, Jacqueline M. Vink5, Najaf Amin6, Frank Geller2, Patrick Sulem2, Thorunn Rafnar2, Tõnu Esko7, Tõnu Esko8, Stefan Walter6, Christian Gieger, Rajesh Rawal, Massimo Mangino9, Inga Prokopenko10, Reedik Mägi11, Reedik Mägi10, Kaisu Keskitalo4, Iris H Gudjonsdottir2, Solveig Gretarsdottir2, Hreinn Stefansson2, John R. Thompson12, Yurii S. Aulchenko6, Mari Nelis8, Mari Nelis7, Katja K.H. Aben13, Martin den Heijer13, Asger Dirksen, Haseem Ashraf, Nicole Soranzo14, Nicole Soranzo9, Ana M. Valdes9, Claire J. Steves9, André G. Uitterlinden6, Albert Hofman6, Anke Tönjes15, Peter Kovacs15, Jouke-Jan Hottenga5, Gonneke Willemsen5, Nicole Vogelzangs16, Angela Döring, Norbert Dahmen17, Barbara Nitz, Michele L. Pergadia18, Berta Saez, Veronica De Diego, Victoria Lezcano, Maria D. Garcia-Prats, Samuli Ripatti4, Samuli Ripatti3, Markus Perola3, Johannes Kettunen14, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen19, Anneli Pouta, Jaana Laitinen20, Matti Isohanni19, Shen Huei-Yi4, Shen Huei-Yi3, Maxine Allen10, Maria Krestyaninova21, Alistair S. Hall22, Gregory T. Jones23, Andre M. van Rij23, Thomas Mueller, Benjamin Dieplinger, Meinhard Haltmayer, Steinn Jonsson, Stefan E Matthiasson24, Hogni Oskarsson, Thorarinn Tyrfingsson, Lambertus A. Kiemeney13, Jose I. Mayordomo25, Jes S. Lindholt, Jesper Holst Pedersen26, Wilbur A. Franklin27, Holly J. Wolf28, Grant W. Montgomery29, Andrew C. Heath18, Nicholas G. Martin29, Pamela A. F. Madden18, Ina Giegling30, Dan Rujescu30, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Veikko Salomaa3, Michael Stumvoll15, Tim D. Spector9, H-Erich Wichmann30, Andres Metspalu8, Andres Metspalu7, Nilesh J. Samani12, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx16, Ben A. Oostra6, Dorret I. Boomsma5, Henning Tiemeier6, Cornelia M. van Duijn6, Jaakko Kaprio3, Jaakko Kaprio4, Jeffrey R. Gulcher2, Mark I. McCarthy10, Mark I. McCarthy11, Leena Peltonen14, Leena Peltonen4, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir2, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir24, Kari Stefansson24, Kari Stefansson2 
TL;DR: The authors conducted genome-wide association meta-analyses for the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) in smokers and smoking initiation (n = 46,481) using samples from the ENGAGE Consortium.
Abstract: Smoking is a common risk factor for many diseases. We conducted genome-wide association meta-analyses for the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) in smokers (n = 31,266) and smoking initiation (n = 46,481) using samples from the ENGAGE Consortium. In a second stage, we tested selected SNPs with in silico replication in the Tobacco and Genetics (TAG) and Glaxo Smith Kline (Ox-GSK) consortia cohorts (n = 45,691 smokers) and assessed some of those in a third sample of European ancestry (n = 9,040). Variants in three genomic regions associated with CPD (P < 5 x 10(-8)), including previously identified SNPs at 15q25 represented by rs1051730[A] (effect size = 0.80 CPD, P = 2.4 x 10(-69)), and SNPs at 19q13 and 8p11, represented by rs4105144[C] (effect size = 0.39 CPD, P = 2.2 x 10(-12)) and rs6474412-T (effect size = 0.29 CPD, P = 1.4 x 10(-8)), respectively. Among the genes at the two newly associated loci are genes encoding nicotine-metabolizing enzymes (CYP2A6 and CYP2B6) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits (CHRNB3 and CHRNA6), all of which have been highlighted in previous studies of smoking and nicotine dependence. Nominal associations with lung cancer were observed at both 8p11 (rs6474412[T], odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, P = 0.04) and 19q13 (rs4105144[C], OR = 1.12, P = 0.0006).

626 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Lambertus A. Kiemeney1, Patrick Sulem2, Søren Besenbacher2, Sita H. Vermeulen, Asgeir Sigurdsson2, Gudmar Thorleifsson2, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson2, Simon N. Stacey2, Julius Gudmundsson2, Carlo Zanon2, Jelena Kostic2, Gisli Masson2, Hjordis Bjarnason2, Stefan T Palsson2, Oskar B Skarphedinsson2, Sigurjon A. Gudjonsson2, J. Alfred Witjes1, Anne J. Grotenhuis, Gerald W. Verhaegh1, D. Timothy Bishop3, Sei C. Sak3, Ananya Choudhury4, Faye Elliott3, Jennifer H. Barrett3, Carolyn D. Hurst3, Petra J. de Verdier5, Charlotta Ryk5, Peter Rudnai6, Eugene Gurzau, Kvetoslava Koppova, Paolo Vineis7, Paolo Vineis8, Silvia Polidoro7, Silvia Polidoro9, Simonetta Guarrera7, Simonetta Guarrera9, Carlotta Sacerdote9, Marcello Campagna10, Donatella Placidi10, Cecilia Arici10, Maurice P. Zeegers11, Maurice P. Zeegers12, Eliane Kellen13, Berta Saez Gutierrez14, José I Sanz-Velez, Manuel Sanchez-Zalabardo, Gabriel Valdivia14, Maria D. Garcia-Prats, Jan G. Hengstler, Meinolf Blaszkewicz, Holger Dietrich15, Roel A. Ophoff16, Roel A. Ophoff17, Leonard H. van den Berg16, Kristin Alexiusdottir, Kristleifur Kristjansson2, Gudmundur Geirsson, Sigfus Nikulasson, Vigdis Petursdottir, Augustine Kong2, Thorgeir E. Thorgeirsson2, N. Aydin Mungan18, Annika Lindblom5, Michael A. van Es16, Stefano Porru10, Frank Buntinx19, Frank Buntinx12, Klaus Golka, Jose I. Mayordomo14, Rajesh Kumar20, Giuseppe Matullo9, Giuseppe Matullo7, Gunnar Steineck21, Gunnar Steineck5, Anne E. Kiltie22, Katja K H Aben, Eirikur Jonsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir2, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir23, Margaret A. Knowles3, Thorunn Rafnar2, Kari Stefansson2, Kari Stefansson23 
TL;DR: The results show a link between germline variants, somatic mutations of FGFR3 and risk of UBC, and Notably, rs798766[T] shows stronger association with low-grade and low-stage UBC than with more aggressive forms of the disease and is associated with higher risk of recurrence in low- grade stage Ta tumors.
Abstract: Previously, we reported germline DNA variants associated with risk of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) in Dutch and Icelandic subjects. Here we expanded the Icelandic sample set and tested the top 20 markers from the combined analysis in several European case-control sample sets, with a total of 4,739 cases and 45,549 controls. The T allele of rs798766 on 4p16.3 was found to associate with UBC (odds ratio = 1.24, P = 9.9 x 10(-12)). rs798766 is located in an intron of TACC3, 70 kb from FGFR3, which often harbors activating somatic mutations in low-grade, noninvasive UBC. Notably, rs798766[T] shows stronger association with low-grade and low-stage UBC than with more aggressive forms of the disease and is associated with higher risk of recurrence in low-grade stage Ta tumors. The frequency of rs798766[T] is higher in Ta tumors that carry an activating mutation in FGFR3 than in Ta tumors with wild-type FGFR3. Our results show a link between germline variants, somatic mutations of FGFR3 and risk of UBC.

174 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings emphasize the role of genetics in the etiology of addiction and highlight the importance of substance‐specific effects in psychostimulant dependence.
Abstract: Here, we provide an overview of previous family studies of addiction and present a new family study based on clinical data for more than 19,000 individuals who have been treated for addiction in Iceland over the last three decades. Coupled with the extensive Icelandic genealogy information, this population-based sample provides a unique opportunity for family studies. The relative risk (RR) was determined for up to fifth-degree relatives of probands diagnosed with alcohol, cannabis, sedative, and amphetamine dependence. We observe highly significant RR values for all substances ranging from 2.27 for alcohol to 7.3 for amphetamine, for first-degree relatives, and RRs significantly above 1 for distant relations, where the effect of shared environmental factors is minimized. The magnitude of risk in psychostimulant dependence is particularly striking. These findings emphasize the role of genetics in the etiology of addiction and highlight the importance of substance-specific effects.

27 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: None of the seven GWAS of lung cancer in Caucasian populations provided statistically significant evidence for an association between rs2352028 and lung cancer risk in never smokers, even when combined, and the association was not significant in the overall meta-analysis pooling results.
Abstract: We read with great interest the genome-wide association study (GWAS) of Li et al1 in the April, 2010 issue of The Lancet Oncology, reporting an association (OR=1·46, 95%CI=1·26–1·70) between the single nucleotide polymorphism rs2352028 mapping to chromosome 13q31·3 and lung cancer risk in never smokers We sought to replicate this finding using data from seven GWAS of lung cancer in Caucasian populations,2–5 with rs2352028 genotype data on 754 never smoker lung cancer cases and 10,580 controls None of the seven studies provided statistically significant evidence for an association between rs2352028 and lung cancer risk in never smokers, even when combined (P=0·57, under both fixed and random effects models; Cochran’s Q Pheterogeneity=0·62, Figure 1), although we had >90% statistical power to detect an association with rs2352028 of 1·26 (the lower limit of the 95% CI reported by Li et al) at the 5% significance level Moreover, the association was not significant in the overall meta-analysis pooling results from our seven studies and from Li et al (OR=1·10, P=0·25, under random effects model; Pheterogeneity=0·003) Analyses using other genetic models (Supplemental Figure 1); adjusting for additional potential confounders, including history of COPD, exposure to second-hand smoke and family history of lung cancer (EAGLE2 only, OR=0·86; 96% CI = 0·63–1·19, p=0·37); or restricted to adenocarcinomas (Figure 1) also provided no evidence for a significant relationship Of note, all controls in our analyses were never smokers, with the exception of the UK sample for which we had no smoking information However, the frequency of the rs2352028 T allele was not significantly different between ever smokers (19,656) and never smokers (7,453) (OR=1·04, p-value=0·30) from other groups, thus the results are not likely to be affected by smoking status in controls Figure 1 Association between rs2352028 and lung cancer risk overall and in adenocarcinoma only in never smokers (additive genetic model) Results from seven independent studies and overall meta-analysis including results from the new seven independent studies The Li et al GWAS was based on 888 cases and 1,384 controls and the association between rs2352028 and lung cancer was at P-value=5·94×10−6 While nominally significant, it is well recognized that as GWAS involve many markers, numerous false positive associations will inevitably be generated, with only a small number being truly associated with disease susceptibility Hence, associations require a high level of statistical significance (5·0×10−7–5·0×10−8) to be established beyond reasonable doubt, and the reported association does not attain genome-wide significance Moreover, under a random effects model the association between rs2352028 and lung cancer reported by Li et al is weak (P=0·0027 overall and P=0·034 for adenocarcinomas) The significant heterogeneity between our studies and those from Li et al could be due to genuine differences in underlying population characteristics and/or due to “winner’s curse” associated with a chance finding Li et al reported a relationship between GPC5 expression in 70 non-tumor lung tissue samples and rs2352028 genotype We examined this correlation in fresh frozen lung tissue samples from 45 adenocarcinomas and 37 non-tumor samples6 and in blood samples from 62 adenocarcinoma cases and 77 controls Although we found lower expression levels in tumor tissue vs noninvolved tissue as previously reported1, we found no significant correlation of rs2352028 genotypes with GPC5 expression in the lung tumor and non-involved tissue samples from cases and in blood samples from controls (p-values=0·07, 0·32 and 0·41, respectively) We observed an association (p=0·03) between genotype and GPC5 expression in blood samples from adenocarcinoma cases, although no trend was apparent and no difference in GPC5 expression between cases and controls was observed (Supplemental Figure 2) This work highlights the importance of large sample sizes and the need for replication in multiple independent groups to identify true positive associations

17 citations