scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Botanical Society of America

NonprofitSt Louis, Missouri, United States
About: Botanical Society of America is a nonprofit organization based out in St Louis, Missouri, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Species richness. The organization has 46 authors who have published 59 publications receiving 1971 citations. The organization is also known as: BSA.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that extensive species richness loss and biotic homogenisation occurred before 1990, whereas these negative trends became substantially less accentuated during recent decades, being partially reversed for certain taxa (e.g. bees in Great Britain and Netherlands).
Abstract: Concern about biodiversity loss has led to increased public investment in conservation. Whereas there is a widespread perception that such initiatives have been unsuccessful, there are few quantitative tests of this perception. Here, we evaluate whether rates of biodiversity change have altered in recent decades in three European countries (Great Britain, Netherlands and Belgium) for plants and flower visiting insects. We compared four 20-year periods, comparing periods of rapid land-use intensification and natural habitat loss (1930–1990) with a period of increased conservation investment (post-1990). We found that extensive species richness loss and biotic homogenisation occurred before 1990, whereas these negative trends became substantially less accentuated during recent decades, being partially reversed for certain taxa (e.g. bees in Great Britain and Netherlands). These results highlight the potential to maintain or even restore current species assemblages (which despite past extinctions are still of great conservation value), at least in regions where large-scale land-use intensification and natural habitat loss has ceased.

331 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Bárbara Goettsch1, Craig Hilton-Taylor1, Gabriela Cruz-Piñón2, James P. Duffy3, Anne Frances4, Héctor M. Hernández5, Richard Inger3, Caroline M. Pollock1, Jan Schipper6, Mariella Superina7, Nigel P. Taylor, Marcelo F. Tognelli8, Agustin Manuel Abba9, Salvador Arias5, Hilda Julieta Arreola-Nava10, Marc A. Baker6, Rolando T. Bárcenas11, Duniel Barrios12, Pierre Braun, Charles A. Butterworth6, Alberto Búrquez5, Fátima Caceres, Miguel Cházaro-Basáñez13, Rafael Corral-Díaz, Mario Del Valle Perea14, Pablo H. Demaio1, Williams A. Duarte De Barros, Rafael Durán, Luis Faúndez Yancas15, Richard S. Felger16, Betty Fitz-Maurice, Walter A. Fitz-Maurice, George D. Gann, Carlos Gómez-Hinostrosa5, Luis R. Gonzales-Torres17, M. Patrick Griffith18, Pablo C. Guerrero19, Pablo C. Guerrero15, Barry E. Hammel20, Kenneth D. Heil21, José Guadalupe Hernández-Oria5, Michael R. Hoffmann1, Michael R. Hoffmann22, Mario Ishiki Ishihara, Roberto Kiesling7, João Larocca, José Luis León de la Luz23, R S Christian Loaiza, Martin Lowry, Marlon C. Machado24, Lucas C. Majure25, Lucas C. Majure26, José Guadalupe Martínez Avalos27, Carlos Martorell5, Joyce Maschinski28, Eduardo Méndez7, Russell A. Mittermeier8, Jafet M. Nassar29, Vivian Negrón-Ortiz30, Vivian Negrón-Ortiz31, Luis Jorge Oakley32, Pablo Ortega-Baes33, Ana Beatriz Pin Ferreira, Donald J. Pinkava26, J. Mark Porter34, Raul Puente-Martinez26, José Eduardo Roque Gamarra35, Patricio Saldivia Pérez, Emiliano Sánchez Martínez, Martin Smith, Simon N. Stuart, José Luis Tapia Muñoz, Teresa Terrazas5, Martin Terry36, Marcelo Trevisson, Teresa Valverde5, Thomas R. Van Devender, Mario Esteban Véliz-Pérez37, Helmut Walter, Sarah A. Wyatt38, Daniela C. Zappi39, J. Alejandro Zavala-Hurtado40, Kevin J. Gaston3 
TL;DR: It is shown that cacti are among the most threatened taxonomic groups assessed to date, with 31% of the 1,478 evaluated species threatened, demonstrating the high anthropogenic pressures on biodiversity in arid lands.
Abstract: A high proportion of plant species is predicted to be threatened with extinction in the near future. However, the threat status of only a small number has been evaluated compared with key animal groups, rendering the magnitude and nature of the risks plants face unclear. Here we report the results of a global species assessment for the largest plant taxon evaluated to date under the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Categories and Criteria, the iconic Cactaceae (cacti). We show that cacti are among the most threatened taxonomic groups assessed to date, with 31% of the 1,478 evaluated species threatened, demonstrating the high anthropogenic pressures on biodiversity in arid lands. The distribution of threatened species and the predominant threatening processes and drivers are different to those described for other taxa. The most significant threat processes comprise land conversion to agriculture and aquaculture, collection as biological resources, and residential and commercial development. The dominant drivers of extinction risk are the unscrupulous collection of live plants and seeds for horticultural trade and private ornamental collections, smallholder livestock ranching and smallholder annual agriculture. Our findings demonstrate that global species assessments are readily achievable for major groups of plants with relatively moderate resources, and highlight different conservation priorities and actions to those derived from species assessments of key animal groups.

238 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work reviewed eight South African conservation planning processes and identified key ingredients of best practice for undertaking systematic conservation assessments in a way that facilitates implementing conservation action.
Abstract: Systematic conservation assessment and conservation planning are two distinct fields of conserva- tion science often confused as one and the same. Systematic conservation assessment is the technical, often computer-based, identification of priority areas for conservation. Conservation planning is composed of a systematic conservation assessment coupled with processes for development of an implementation strategy and stakeholder collaboration. The peer-reviewed conservation biology literature abounds with studies ana- lyzing the performance of assessments (e.g., area-selection techniques). This information alone, however, can never deliver effective conservation action; it informs conservation planning. Examples of how to translate systematic assessment outputs into knowledge and then use them for "doing" conservation are rare. South Africa has received generous international and domestic funding for regional conservation planning since the mid-1990s. We reviewed eight South African conservation planning processes and identified key ingredients of best practice for undertaking systematic conservation assessments in a way that facilitates implementing conservation action. These key ingredients include the design of conservation planning processes, skills for conservation assessment teams, collaboration with stakeholders, and interpretation and mainstreaming of products (e.g., maps) for stakeholders. Social learning institutions are critical to the successful operationaliza- tion of assessments within broader conservation planning processes and should include not only conservation planners but also diverse interest groups, including rural landowners, politicians, and government employees.

235 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jun 2012-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: The database of DNA barcodes for Welsh native flowering plants and conifers represents the most complete coverage of any national flora, and offers a valuable platform for a wide range of applications that require accurate species identification.
Abstract: We present the first national DNA barcode resource that covers the native flowering plants and conifers for the nation of Wales (1143 species). Using the plant DNA barcode markers rbcL and matK, we have assembled 97.7% coverage for rbcL, 90.2% for matK, and a dual-locus barcode for 89.7% of the native Welsh flora. We have sampled multiple individuals for each species, resulting in 3304 rbcL and 2419 matK sequences. The majority of our samples (85%) are from DNA extracted from herbarium specimens. Recoverability of DNA barcodes is lower using herbarium specimens, compared to freshly collected material, mostly due to lower amplification success, but this is balanced by the increased efficiency of sampling species that have already been collected, identified, and verified by taxonomic experts. The effectiveness of the DNA barcodes for identification (level of discrimination) is assessed using four approaches: the presence of a barcode gap (using pairwise and multiple alignments), formation of monophyletic groups using Neighbour-Joining trees, and sequence similarity in BLASTn searches. These approaches yield similar results, providing relative discrimination levels of 69.4 to 74.9% of all species and 98.6 to 99.8% of genera using both markers. Species discrimination can be further improved using spatially explicit sampling. Mean species discrimination using barcode gap analysis (with a multiple alignment) is 81.6% within 10×10 km squares and 93.3% for 2×2 km squares. Our database of DNA barcodes for Welsh native flowering plants and conifers represents the most complete coverage of any national flora, and offers a valuable platform for a wide range of applications that require accurate species identification.

168 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Progress in genomics, mass spectrometry and other analytical technologies are continuing to illuminate the wealth of biological and chemical diversity present within the lichen holobiome, and implementation of novel biodiscovery strategies such as metagenomic screening, coupled with synthetic biology approaches to reconstitute, re-engineer and heterologously express lichen-derived biosynthetic gene clusters in a cultivable host offer a promising means for tapping into this hitherto inaccessible wealth of natural products.
Abstract: Lichens, which are defined by a core symbiosis between a mycobiont (fungal partner) and a photobiont (photoautotrophic partner), are in fact complex assemblages of microorganisms that constitute a largely untapped source of bioactive secondary metabolites. Historically, compounds isolated from lichens have predominantly been those produced by the dominant fungal partner, and these continue to be of great interest for their unique chemistry and biotechnological potential. In recent years it has become apparent that many photobionts and lichen-associated bacteria also produce a range of potentially valuable molecules. There is evidence to suggest that the unique nature of the symbiosis has played a substantial role in shaping many aspects of lichen chemistry, for example driving bacteria to produce metabolites that do not bring them direct benefit but are useful to the lichen as a whole. This is most evident in studies of cyanobacterial photobionts, which produce compounds that differ from free living cyanobacteria and are unique to symbiotic organisms. The roles that these and other lichen-derived molecules may play in communication and maintaining the symbiosis are poorly understood at present. Nonetheless, advances in genomics, mass spectrometry and other analytical technologies are continuing to illuminate the wealth of biological and chemical diversity present within the lichen holobiome. Implementation of novel biodiscovery strategies such as metagenomic screening, coupled with synthetic biology approaches to reconstitute, re-engineer and heterologously express lichen-derived biosynthetic gene clusters in a cultivable host, offer a promising means for tapping into this hitherto inaccessible wealth of natural products.

133 citations


Authors
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
5.9K papers, 363.9K citations

81% related

Royal Botanic Gardens
6.8K papers, 257.4K citations

80% related

Florida Museum of Natural History
2.6K papers, 95.7K citations

77% related

Field Museum of Natural History
2.9K papers, 134.5K citations

76% related

National Museum of Natural History
10K papers, 358.5K citations

75% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
20213
20203
20192
20186
20174