Institution
Georgetown University
Education•Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States•
About: Georgetown University is a education organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 23377 authors who have published 43718 publications receiving 1748598 citations. The organization is also known as: GU & Georgetown.
Topics: Population, Cancer, Breast cancer, Health care, Politics
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of California, Berkeley1, Harvard University2, University of Rochester3, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center4, George Washington University5, Ghent University6, University of Chicago7, Henry Ford Health System8, Georgetown University9, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research10, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey11, Imperial College London12, University of Pittsburgh13, University of Virginia14, Washington University in St. Louis15, University of Pennsylvania16, University College London17, Nippon Medical School18, Celgene19, Scripps Health20, Saint Louis University21, Johns Hopkins University22
TL;DR: An expert panel from multiple disciplines developed definitions for rhinosinusitis and outlined strategies for design of clinical trials and reached consensus on definitions and strategies for clinical research on acute presumed bacterial rhinosineitis, chronic rhinosinitis with polyposis, and classic allergic fungal rhinosinesitis.
Abstract: Objectives: to develop consensus definitions for rhinosinusitis and outline strategies useful in clinical trials
559 citations
TL;DR: Positioning theory as discussed by the authors opens up a new dimension in the psychology of interpersonal encounters, through explicit attention to the role of rights and duties in the management of action, where people are positioned or position themselves with respect to rights and duty to act within evolving story-lines, and on the basis of claims about relevant personal attributes, the discursive process of prepositioning.
Abstract: Positioning theory opens up a new dimension in the psychology of interpersonal encounters, through explicit attention to the role of rights and duties in the management of action. People are positioned or position themselves with respect to rights and duties to act within evolving story-lines, and on the basis of claims about relevant personal attributes, the discursive process of prepositioning. Some recent applications of positioning theory are presented, ranging from simple interpersonal encounters, through positioning in a complex public but limited legal struggle, to the positioning techniques used to justify civilian causalities in warfare, to the analysis of examples of the discourses by which large-scale social entities position themselves in relation to others.
557 citations
TL;DR: Recommendations are made using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, as has been done with other Society for Vascular Surgery guideline documents.[corrected] the perioperative risk of stroke and death in asymptomatic patients must be <3% to ensure benefit for the patient.
557 citations
TL;DR: A comprehensive review of the empirical literature in transaction cost economics (TCE) across multiple social science disciplines and business fields can be found in this paper, where the authors show how TCE has branched out from its economic roots to examine empirical phenomena in several other areas.
Abstract: This paper provides a comprehensive review of the empirical literature in transaction cost economics (TCE) across multiple social science disciplines and business fields. We show how TCE has branched out from its economic roots to examine empirical phenomena in several other areas. We find TCE is increasingly being applied not only to business-related fields such as accounting, finance, marketing, and organizational theory, but also to areas outside of business including political science, law, public policy, and agriculture and health. With few exceptions, however, the use of TCE reasoning to inform empirical research in these areas is piecemeal. We find that there is considerable support of many of the central tenets of TCE, but we also observe a number of lingering theoretical and empirical issues that need to be addressed. We conclude by discussing the implications of these issues and outlining directions for future theoretical and empirical work.
556 citations
TL;DR: The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS‐QOL) questionnaire subscales discriminated not only from normal controls but also among leiomyomata patients with varying degrees of symptom severity, and appears to be a useful new tool for detecting differences in symptom severity and health‐related quality of life among patients with uterine leiomata.
553 citations
Authors
Showing all 23641 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyrus Cooper | 204 | 1869 | 206782 |
| David Cella | 156 | 1258 | 106402 |
| Carl H. June | 156 | 835 | 98904 |
| Ichiro Kawachi | 149 | 1216 | 90282 |
| Judy Garber | 147 | 756 | 79157 |
| Bernard J. Gersh | 146 | 973 | 95875 |
| Edward G. Lakatta | 146 | 858 | 88637 |
| Eugene C. Butcher | 146 | 446 | 72849 |
| Mark A. Rubin | 145 | 699 | 95640 |
| Richard B. Devereux | 144 | 962 | 116403 |
| Robert H. Purcell | 139 | 666 | 70366 |
| Eric P. Winer | 139 | 751 | 71587 |
| Richard L. Huganir | 137 | 425 | 61023 |
| Rasmus Nielsen | 135 | 556 | 84898 |
| Henry T. Lynch | 133 | 925 | 86270 |