Institution
Santa Fe Institute
Nonprofit•Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States•
About: Santa Fe Institute is a nonprofit organization based out in Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 558 authors who have published 4558 publications receiving 396015 citations. The organization is also known as: SFI.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The authors found that the advantages of the children of successful parents go beyond the benefits of superior education, the inheritance of wealth, or the genetic inheritance of cognitive ability, and suggested that noncognitive personality variables such as attitudes towards risk, ability to adapt to new economic conditions, hard work, and the rate of time preference affect both earning and the transmission of economic status across generations.
Abstract: We survey the determinants of earnings and propose a framework for understanding labor market success. We suggest that the advantages of the children of successful parents go considerably beyond the benefits of superior education, the inheritance of wealth, or the genetic inheritance of cognitive ability. We suggest that noncognitive personality variables, such as attitudes towards risk, ability to adapt to new economic conditions, hard work, and the rate of time preference affect both earning and the transmission of economic status across generations.
1,124 citations
••
TL;DR: The leaders of the world are flying the economy by the seat of their pants, say J. Doyne Farmer and Duncan Foley, and there is a better way to help guide financial policies.
Abstract: The leaders of the world are flying the economy by the seat of their pants, say J. Doyne Farmer and Duncan Foley. There is, however, a better way to help guide financial policies.
1,109 citations
••
TL;DR: There is one nontrivial length-scale in the small-world network model of Watts and Strogatz, analogous to the correlation length in other systems, which is well-defined in the limit of infinite system size and which diverges continuously as the randomness in the network tends to zero, giving a normal critical point in this limit.
Abstract: In this paper we study the small-world network model of Watts and Strogatz, which mimics some aspects of the structure of networks of social interactions. We argue that there is one nontrivial length-scale in the model, analogous to the correlation length in other systems, which is well-defined in the limit of infinite system size and which diverges continuously as the randomness in the network tends to zero, giving a normal critical point in this limit. This length-scale governs the crossover from large- to small-world behavior in the model, as well as the number of vertices in a neighborhood of given radius on the network. We derive the value of the single critical exponent controlling behavior in the critical region and the finite size scaling form for the average vertex-vertex distance on the network, and, using series expansion and Pade approximants, find an approximate analytic form for the scaling function. We calculate the effective dimension of small-world graphs and show that this dimension varies as a function of the length-scale on which it is measured, in a manner reminiscent of multifractals. We also study the problem of site percolation on small-world networks as a simple model of disease propagation, and derive an approximate expression for the percolation probability at which a giant component of connected vertices first forms (in epidemiological terms, the point at which an epidemic occurs). The typical cluster radius satisfies the expected finite size scaling form with a cluster size exponent close to that for a random graph. All our analytic results are confirmed by extensive numerical simulations of the model.
1,106 citations
•
31 May 2011TL;DR: Using experimental, archaeological, genetic, and ethnographic data to calibrate models of the coevolution of genes and culture as well as prehistoric warfare and other forms of group competition, A Cooperative Species provides a compelling and novel account of how humans came to be moral and cooperative.
Abstract: Why do humans, uniquely among animals, cooperate in large numbers to advance projects for the common good? Contrary to the conventional wisdom in biology and economics, this generous and civic-minded behavior is widespread and cannot be explained simply by far-sighted self-interest or a desire to help close genealogical kin.
In A Cooperative Species, Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis--pioneers in the new experimental and evolutionary science of human behavior--show that the central issue is not why selfish people act generously, but instead how genetic and cultural evolution has produced a species in which substantial numbers make sacrifices to uphold ethical norms and to help even total strangers.
The authors describe how, for thousands of generations, cooperation with fellow group members has been essential to survival. Groups that created institutions to protect the civic-minded from exploitation by the selfish flourished and prevailed in conflicts with less cooperative groups. Key to this process was the evolution of social emotions such as shame and guilt, and our capacity to internalize social norms so that acting ethically became a personal goal rather than simply a prudent way to avoid punishment.
Using experimental, archaeological, genetic, and ethnographic data to calibrate models of the coevolution of genes and culture as well as prehistoric warfare and other forms of group competition, A Cooperative Species provides a compelling and novel account of how humans came to be moral and cooperative.
1,090 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a real-space renormalization group transformation for the model is proposed and the scaling form for the average number of degrees of separation between two nodes on the network as a function of the three independent variables is derived.
Abstract: We study the small-world network model, which mimics the transition between regular-lattice and random-lattice behavior in social networks of increasing size. We contend that the model displays a normal continuous phase transition with a divergent correlation length as the degree of randomness tends to zero. We propose a real-space renormalization group transformation for the model and demonstrate that the transformation is exact in the limit of large system size. We use this result to calculate the exact value of the single critical exponent for the system, and to derive the scaling form for the average number of "degrees of separation" between two nodes on the network as a function of the three independent variables. We confirm our results by extensive numerical simulation.
1,076 citations
Authors
Showing all 606 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
James Hone | 127 | 637 | 108193 |
James H. Brown | 125 | 423 | 72040 |
Alan S. Perelson | 118 | 632 | 66767 |
Mark Newman | 117 | 348 | 168598 |
Bette T. Korber | 117 | 392 | 49526 |
Marten Scheffer | 111 | 350 | 73789 |
Peter F. Stadler | 103 | 901 | 56813 |
Sanjay Jain | 103 | 881 | 46880 |
Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen | 102 | 1286 | 48138 |
Dirk Helbing | 101 | 642 | 56810 |
Oliver G. Pybus | 100 | 447 | 45313 |
Andrew P. Dobson | 98 | 322 | 44211 |
Carel P. van Schaik | 94 | 329 | 26908 |
Seth Lloyd | 92 | 490 | 50159 |
Andrew W. Lo | 85 | 378 | 51440 |