scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Santa Fe Institute

NonprofitSanta Fe, New Mexico, United States
About: Santa Fe Institute is a nonprofit organization based out in Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 558 authors who have published 4558 publications receiving 396015 citations. The organization is also known as: SFI.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A robotic implementation of the first formalized model of cooperative transport in ants, which provides an interesting example of decentralized problem-solving by a group of robots.

458 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There are strong signatures in these networks of topography and use patterns, giving the networks shapes that are quite distinct from one another and from non-geographic networks.
Abstract: We study networks that connect points in geographic space, such as transportation networks and the Internet. We find that there are strong signatures in these networks of topography and use patterns, giving the networks shapes that are quite distinct from one another and from non-geographic networks. We offer an explanation of these differences in terms of the costs and benefits of transportation and communication, and give a simple model based on the Monte Carlo optimization of these costs and benefits that reproduces well the qualitative features of the networks studied.

455 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An efficient algorithm is described that can measure an observable quantity in a percolation system for all values of the site or bond occupation probability from zero to one in an amount of time that scales linearly with the size of the system.
Abstract: We describe in detail an efficient algorithm for studying site or bond percolation on any lattice. The algorithm can measure an observable quantity in a percolation system for all values of the site or bond occupation probability from zero to one in an amount of time that scales linearly with the size of the system. We demonstrate our algorithm by using it to investigate a number of issues in percolation theory, including the position of the percolation transition for site percolation on the square lattice, the stretched exponential behavior of spanning probabilities away from the critical point, and the size of the giant component for site percolation on random graphs.

454 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper explores a recent model of proteome evolution that has been shown to reproduce many of the features displayed by its real counterparts and suggests that the overall topology of the protein maps naturally emerges from the two leading mechanisms considered by the model.

452 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proved that no algorithm can uniquely solve community detection, and a general No Free Lunch theorem for community detection is proved, which implies that there can be no algorithm that is optimal for all possible community detection tasks.
Abstract: Across many scientific domains, there is a common need to automatically extract a simplified view or coarse-graining of how a complex system's components interact. This general task is called community detection in networks and is analogous to searching for clusters in independent vector data. It is common to evaluate the performance of community detection algorithms by their ability to find so-called ground truth communities. This works well in synthetic networks with planted communities because these networks' links are formed explicitly based on those known communities. However, there are no planted communities in real-world networks. Instead, it is standard practice to treat some observed discrete-valued node attributes, or metadata, as ground truth. We show that metadata are not the same as ground truth and that treating them as such induces severe theoretical and practical problems. We prove that no algorithm can uniquely solve community detection, and we prove a general No Free Lunch theorem for community detection, which implies that there can be no algorithm that is optimal for all possible community detection tasks. However, community detection remains a powerful tool and node metadata still have value, so a careful exploration of their relationship with network structure can yield insights of genuine worth. We illustrate this point by introducing two statistical techniques that can quantify the relationship between metadata and community structure for a broad class of models. We demonstrate these techniques using both synthetic and real-world networks, and for multiple types of metadata and community structures.

447 citations


Authors

Showing all 606 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
James Hone127637108193
James H. Brown12542372040
Alan S. Perelson11863266767
Mark Newman117348168598
Bette T. Korber11739249526
Marten Scheffer11135073789
Peter F. Stadler10390156813
Sanjay Jain10388146880
Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen102128648138
Dirk Helbing10164256810
Oliver G. Pybus10044745313
Andrew P. Dobson9832244211
Carel P. van Schaik9432926908
Seth Lloyd9249050159
Andrew W. Lo8537851440
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
268K papers, 18.2M citations

90% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

90% related

Princeton University
146.7K papers, 9.1M citations

89% related

Max Planck Society
406.2K papers, 19.5M citations

89% related

University of California, Berkeley
265.6K papers, 16.8M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202341
202241
2021297
2020309
2019263
2018231