Institution
Shaw University
Education•Raleigh, North Carolina, United States•
About: Shaw University is a education organization based out in Raleigh, North Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Genocide & Public health. The organization has 95 authors who have published 138 publications receiving 3467 citations. The organization is also known as: Raleigh Institute.
Topics: Genocide, Public health, Population, Health care, Health equity
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: All measures provided similar estimates of overall adherence, although refill and electronic measures were in highest agreement, and practitioners should consider population and disease characteristics, since measurement agreement could be influenced by these and other factors.
Abstract: Background:Medication adherence is suboptimal, and clinicians and researchers struggle with identifying nonadherent patients. Various measures of medication adherence exist, but there is controversy regarding which measures provide acceptable data and how nonadherence should be defined.Objective:To assess agreement among patient self-report, pharmacy refill, and electronic adherence measures and compare the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-points for defining nonadherence.Methods:Data were analyzed from 2 similarly designed randomized controlled trials that assessed a pharmacist's intervention to improve medication adherence among patients with hypertension or heart failure. For each participant, adherence was measured by patient self-report, prescription refill records, and electronic lids on medication containers. Agreement among measures was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient rho. Correlation coefficients were compared by patient characteristics using Fisher's Z transformatio...
263 citations
••
TL;DR: These social factors and design features should be considered in order to stimulate higher levels of park-based physical activity among children and adolescents.
190 citations
••
TL;DR: Satisfaction with the research partnership was high, but so was concern about the need for all research teams to establish trust with church partners, and an intervention study based on CBPR methods was able to meet most of these expectations.
Abstract: Objectives. This study sought to examine the expectations and satisfaction of pastors and lay leaders regarding a research partnership in a randomized trial guided by community based participatory research (CBPR) methods. Methods. Telephone and self-administered print surveys were administered to 78 pastors and lay leaders. In-depth interviews were conducted with 4 pastors after study completion. Results. The combined survey response rate was 65%. Research expectations included honest and frequent communication, sensitivity to the church environment, interaction as partners, and results provided to the churches. Satisfaction with the research partnership was high, but so was concern about the need for all research teams to establish trust with church partners. Conclusions. Pastors and lay leaders have high expectations regarding university obligations in research partnerships. An intervention study based on CBPR methods was able to meet most of these expectations.
176 citations
••
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine1, Johns Hopkins University2, University of Brescia3, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology4, Cardiff University5, Ohio State University6, University of Virginia7, Ikerbasque8, National Institutes of Health9, Loyola University Chicago10, Southern Medical University11, University of Maryland, College Park12, University of Alabama at Birmingham13, PSL Research University14, University of California, San Diego15, Oslo University Hospital16, Harvard University17, University of Buenos Aires18, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai19, University of Washington20, Shaw University21, French Institute of Health and Medical Research22, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology23, Ghent University24, Spanish National Research Council25, Utrecht University26, University of Würzburg27, Tsinghua University28, Oxford Brookes University29
TL;DR: It is revealed that while much progress has been made in the field, there are still several concepts that divide opinion and areas with little to no consensus include EV storage and stability, as well as whether and how EVs fuse with target cells.
Abstract: Paracrine and endocrine roles have increasingly been ascribed to extracellular vesicles (EVs) generated by multicellular organisms. Central to the biogenesis, content, and function of EVs are their delimiting lipid bilayer membranes. To evaluate research progress on membranes and EVs, the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) conducted a workshop in March 2018 in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, bringing together key opinion leaders and hands-on researchers who were selected on the basis of submitted applications. The workshop was accompanied by two scientific surveys and covered four broad topics: EV biogenesis and release; EV uptake and fusion; technologies and strategies used to study EV membranes; and EV transfer and functional assays. In this ISEV position paper, we synthesize the results of the workshop and the related surveys to outline important outstanding questions about EV membranes and describe areas of consensus. The workshop discussions and survey responses reveal that while much progress has been made in the field, there are still several concepts that divide opinion. Good consensus exists in some areas, including particular aspects of EV biogenesis, uptake and downstream signalling. Areas with little to no consensus include EV storage and stability, as well as whether and how EVs fuse with target cells. Further research is needed in these key areas, as a better understanding of membrane biology will contribute substantially towards advancing the field of extracellular vesicles.
159 citations
••
TL;DR: People with psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder reported markedly more difficulty in obtaining a primary care physician and greater barriers to care than the general population, and interventions are needed to improve provision of primary medical care to this population.
Abstract: Objective People with serious mental illness have higher mortality rates than the general population, and this difference is not explained by such causes as suicide or accidents. This study therefore examined access and barriers to medical care among persons with serious mental illness. Methods Using a nationally representative sample, the authors examined access and barriers to medical care among individuals reporting psychotic and mood disorders. The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and NHIS-Disability Component for 1994 and 1995 were merged to provide a sample of 156,475 people over age 18. Individuals with psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, or major depression were compared with persons without mental disorders on the following outcomes: having a primary care physician, being unable to get needed medical care, being unable to get a needed prescription medication, and delaying medical care because of cost. Results Persons with psychotic disorders (odds ratio [OR]=.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]=.44-.69) and bipolar disorder (OR=.74, CI=.56-.98) had significantly reduced odds of having a primary care physician compared with people without mental disorders. For any barriers to care, persons with psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder had greatly increased odds (ORs=2.5-7.0) of reporting difficulties in accessing care. Conclusions Persons with psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder reported markedly more difficulty in obtaining a primary care physician and greater barriers to care than the general population. Interventions are needed to improve provision of primary medical care to this population.
152 citations
Authors
Showing all 110 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
April P. Carson | 30 | 96 | 9206 |
Daniel L. Howard | 21 | 60 | 1324 |
Helen N. Asemota | 20 | 71 | 1121 |
Lori Carter-Edwards | 19 | 35 | 944 |
Louie E. Ross | 16 | 27 | 743 |
Bill Freund | 16 | 32 | 992 |
Yhenneko J. Taylor | 16 | 55 | 734 |
Mimi M. Kim | 14 | 21 | 1683 |
Benjamin E. Cuker | 13 | 42 | 595 |
M. Ahinee Amamoo | 12 | 17 | 766 |
Moses V. Goldmon | 11 | 20 | 393 |
Bharat S. Rawal | 10 | 64 | 362 |
Lekisha Edwards | 9 | 13 | 224 |
Lori Carter-Edwards | 9 | 10 | 270 |
Comfort O. Okpala | 9 | 28 | 281 |