scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Advanced Parkinson disease treated with rotigotine transdermal system: PREFER Study

TLDR
Transdermal rotigotine significantly improved “off” time in subjects with Parkinson disease not optimally controlled with levodopa and was safe and well tolerated, with typical dopaminergic side effects and occasional application site reactions.
Abstract
Background: In patients experiencing motor fluctuations, a major treatment challenge is the reduction of “off” time, particularly upon awakening. Rotigotine (Neupro) is a novel dopaminergic agonist with 24-hour transdermal delivery. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PREFER Study) was performed to assess efficacy and safety with two targeted transdermal doses of rotigotine in subjects with advanced Parkinson disease with ≥2.5 hours of daily “off” time. Subjects were randomized to receive placebo patches (n = 120) or rotigotine up to either 8 mg/24 hours (n = 120) or 12 mg/24 hours (n = 111). The primary efficacy measures compared changes from baseline to the end of week 24 in the number of daily hours “off” and responder rates for subjects achieving ≥30% reduction in “off” time. Results: Compared to placebo, there were significant decreases in mean “off” time of 1.8 hours/day for the rotigotine 8 mg/24 hours group and 1.2 hours/day for the 12 mg/24 hours group. For rotigotine 8 and 12 mg/24 hours groups, ≥30% responder rates were 56.6% and 55.1% compared to the 34.5% placebo response. “On” time without dyskinesia after awakening was more than doubled in both rotigotine treatment groups vs placebo. Drug-related adverse effects included typical dopaminergic side effects, which were generally mild/moderate in intensity. Patch application site reactions including erythema and pruritus were mild to moderate and transient in the majority of instances. Conclusions: Transdermal rotigotine significantly improved “off” time in subjects with Parkinson disease not optimally controlled with levodopa and was safe and well tolerated, with typical dopaminergic side effects and occasional application site reactions.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Review Update: Treatments for the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

TL;DR: The objective of this work was to update previous EBM reviews on treatments for PD with a focus on non‐motor symptoms and found that most of the other interventions there is insufficient evidence to make adequate conclusions on their efficacy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009)

TL;DR: This monograph provides an overview of the management of PD patients, with an emphasis on pathophysiology, and the results of recent clinical trials to provide physicians with an understanding of the different treatment options that are available for managing the different stages of the disease and the scientific rationale of theDifferent approaches.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical evaluation of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

TL;DR: Pramipexole improved motor function of patients during "on" and"off" periods, decreased the time spent in "off") periods, reduced the severity of "off"periods, decreased disability and PD severity as assessed by the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and permitted a reduction in levodopa dosage.
Journal ArticleDOI

A home diary to assess functional status in patients with Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia.

TL;DR: It is argued that patients might not be improved if off time is reduced only to the extent that unwanted dyskinesia is increased, so a home diary should include an assessment of dyskine to provide an accurate reflection of clinical status over a period of time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease

TL;DR: It is concluded that pramipexole-treated patients with advanced PD improved significantly more than placebo for both primary end points and in regard to comparison of the Global Clinical Assessment of Efficacy between active treatment groups, there was a trend to significance in favor of pramipingxole.
Journal ArticleDOI

Differential actions of antiparkinson agents at multiple classes of monoaminergic receptor. II. Agonist and antagonist properties at subtypes of dopamine D(2)-like receptor and alpha(1)/alpha(2)-adrenoceptor.

TL;DR: In conclusion, antiparkinson agents display diverse agonist and antagonist properties at multiple subtypes of D2-like receptor and α1/α2-AR, actions, which likely contribute to their contrasting functional profiles.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
In-vitro and in-vivo studies of efficacy pramapexole versus rotigotine in advanced parkinson disease?

The provided information does not mention any in-vitro or in-vivo studies comparing the efficacy of pramipexole versus rotigotine in advanced Parkinson's disease.