scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems

TLDR
This paper proposes 260 randomly generated scheduling problems whose size is greater than that of the rare examples published, and the objective is the minimization of the makespan.
About
This article is published in European Journal of Operational Research.The article was published on 1993-01-22 and is currently open access. It has received 2173 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Flow shop scheduling & Job shop scheduling.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Discrete harmony search algorithm for the no-wait flow shop scheduling problem with total flow time criterion

TL;DR: In this article, a discrete harmony search algorithm (DHS) is developed for solving the no-wait flow shop scheduling problem with the objective to minimize total flowtime, where a harmony is represented as a discrete job permutation and a new heuristic based on the well-known NEH method is proposed to initialize the harmony memory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Solving the open shop scheduling problem

TL;DR: This work describes a branch-and-bound algorithm for solving the open shop scheduling problem which performs better than other existing algorithms and focuses on constraint propagation based methods for reducing the search space.
Journal ArticleDOI

A multi-objective genetic algorithm for scheduling in flow shops to minimize the makespan and total flow time of jobs

TL;DR: In this article, a Pareto-ranking based multi-objective GA with an archive of non-dominated solutions subjected to a local search (PGA-ALS) is proposed.

Self-Adapting Large Neighborhood Search: Application to Single-Mode Scheduling Problems

TL;DR: The algorithm is evaluated on a set of 21 scheduling benchmarks, most of which are well established in the scheduling community, and outperforms state-of-the-art problem-specific algorithms on 7 benchmarks clearly showing that the algorithm is a valuable compromise between robustness and efficiency.
Journal ArticleDOI

A unified approach for the evaluation of quay crane scheduling models and algorithms

TL;DR: A unified approach for evaluating the performance of different model classes and solution procedures is presented, demonstrated by investigating the suitability of three models within a comprehensive computational study.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Tabu Search—Part II

TL;DR: The elements of staged search and structured move sets are characterized, which bear on the issue of finiteness, and new dynamic strategies for managing tabu lists are introduced, allowing fuller exploitation of underlying evaluation functions.
Journal ArticleDOI

OR-Library: Distributing Test Problems by Electronic Mail

TL;DR: A system (OR-Library) that distributes test problems by electronic mail (e-mail) that has available test problems drawn from a number of different areas of operational research.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Guide to Simulation.

TL;DR: Despite the brevity of the book, its mathematical notation, and the problems which it poses without solutions, the textbook is imbued with a feeling for theitty-gritty practical aspects of simulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Computational Study of the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem

TL;DR: The optimization procedure, combining the heuristic method and the combinatorial branch and bound algorithm, solved the well-known 10×10 problem of J. F. Thomson in under 7 minutes of computation time on a Sun Sparcstation 1.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (7)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Basic scheduling problems" ?

In this paper, the authors propose 260 scheduling problems whose size is greater than that of the rare examples published. The types of problems that the authors propose are: the permutation flow shop, the job shop and the open shop scheduling problems. 

let us mention5 that an iteration of taboo search needs about 4.10-6.n2.m seconds on a “Silicon Graphics” personal workstation (10 Mips). 

The machine Mij on which the jth operation of job i has to be performed is given by the following procedure :0) Mij := j (1 L Q M P 1) For i = 1 to nFor j = 1 to m Swap Mij and MiU[j,m]Let us note the use of another initial seed for the choice of the machines : Machine seed. 

The proportion of problems for which the authors found a solution for which the makespan was equal to the lower bound (or equal to the lower bound augmented by 2% for the 500-job 20-machine problems). 

This implementation uses only 32-bit integers and provides a uniformly distributed sequence of numbers between 0 and 1 (not contained) :3 0) Initial seed and X0 (0 < X0 < 231- 1) constants : a = 16 807, b = 127 773, c = 2 836, m = 231 - 11) Modification of k := Xi/b the seed : Xi+1 := a(Xi mod b) - kcIf Xi+1 < 0 then let Xi+1 := Xi+1 + m2) New value of the seed : Xi+1 Current value of the generator : Xi+1/mBelow, the authors shall denote by U(0,1) the pseudorandom number that this generator provides. 

The random number generator Let us recall the implementation of the linear congruential generator the authors have used which is based on the recursive formula Xi+1 = (16 807 Xi) mod (231 - 1). 

In order to implement the integer random procedure only with 32-bit integers, the problems have been chosen in such a way that one never has to deal with a seed X such that :a + P DE; )1( +−⋅ ≠ a + )1( +−