scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems

TLDR
This paper proposes 260 randomly generated scheduling problems whose size is greater than that of the rare examples published, and the objective is the minimization of the makespan.
About
This article is published in European Journal of Operational Research.The article was published on 1993-01-22 and is currently open access. It has received 2173 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Flow shop scheduling & Job shop scheduling.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Scheduling sequence-dependent setup time job shops with preventive maintenance

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed two techniques that are easy to understand and code, yet simplistically adaptable to any other machine-scheduling problems, such as job shop scheduling with sequencedependent setup times and preventive maintenance policies.
Book ChapterDOI

Compiling finite linear CSP into SAT

TL;DR: This paper proposes a method to encode Constraint Satisfaction problems with integer linear constraints into Boolean Satisfiability Testing Problems (SAT), and proves the optimal results for all instances including three previously undecided problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experiences with fine‐grainedparallel genetic algorithms

TL;DR: Some results of systematic studies of fine‐grained parallelversions of the island model of genetic algorithms and of variants of the neighborhood model on the massively parallel computer MasPar MP1 with 16k processing elements are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Metaheuristics in Logistics and Supply Chain Management

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss ant colony optimization, genetic algorithm, simulated annealing, and tabu search metaheuristic techniques to examine supply chain risk and disruptions, intermodal operations, customer service trade-offs, backhaul strategies, and simultaneous facility location and vehicle route problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

An iterated greedy algorithm with optimization of partial solutions for the makespan permutation flowshop problem

TL;DR: The possibility of re-optimizing partial solutions obtained after the solution destruction step of the iterated greedy algorithm is explored and it is shown that with this extension, the performance of the state-of-the-art algorithm for the PFSP under makespan criterion can be significantly improved.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Tabu Search—Part II

TL;DR: The elements of staged search and structured move sets are characterized, which bear on the issue of finiteness, and new dynamic strategies for managing tabu lists are introduced, allowing fuller exploitation of underlying evaluation functions.
Journal ArticleDOI

OR-Library: Distributing Test Problems by Electronic Mail

TL;DR: A system (OR-Library) that distributes test problems by electronic mail (e-mail) that has available test problems drawn from a number of different areas of operational research.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Guide to Simulation.

TL;DR: Despite the brevity of the book, its mathematical notation, and the problems which it poses without solutions, the textbook is imbued with a feeling for theitty-gritty practical aspects of simulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Computational Study of the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem

TL;DR: The optimization procedure, combining the heuristic method and the combinatorial branch and bound algorithm, solved the well-known 10×10 problem of J. F. Thomson in under 7 minutes of computation time on a Sun Sparcstation 1.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (7)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Basic scheduling problems" ?

In this paper, the authors propose 260 scheduling problems whose size is greater than that of the rare examples published. The types of problems that the authors propose are: the permutation flow shop, the job shop and the open shop scheduling problems. 

let us mention5 that an iteration of taboo search needs about 4.10-6.n2.m seconds on a “Silicon Graphics” personal workstation (10 Mips). 

The machine Mij on which the jth operation of job i has to be performed is given by the following procedure :0) Mij := j (1 L Q M P 1) For i = 1 to nFor j = 1 to m Swap Mij and MiU[j,m]Let us note the use of another initial seed for the choice of the machines : Machine seed. 

The proportion of problems for which the authors found a solution for which the makespan was equal to the lower bound (or equal to the lower bound augmented by 2% for the 500-job 20-machine problems). 

This implementation uses only 32-bit integers and provides a uniformly distributed sequence of numbers between 0 and 1 (not contained) :3 0) Initial seed and X0 (0 < X0 < 231- 1) constants : a = 16 807, b = 127 773, c = 2 836, m = 231 - 11) Modification of k := Xi/b the seed : Xi+1 := a(Xi mod b) - kcIf Xi+1 < 0 then let Xi+1 := Xi+1 + m2) New value of the seed : Xi+1 Current value of the generator : Xi+1/mBelow, the authors shall denote by U(0,1) the pseudorandom number that this generator provides. 

The random number generator Let us recall the implementation of the linear congruential generator the authors have used which is based on the recursive formula Xi+1 = (16 807 Xi) mod (231 - 1). 

In order to implement the integer random procedure only with 32-bit integers, the problems have been chosen in such a way that one never has to deal with a seed X such that :a + P DE; )1( +−⋅ ≠ a + )1( +−