scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Fostering knowledge sharing behaviour among public sector managers: a proposed model for the Malaysian public service

TLDR
The paper proposes organisational commitment as the mediating variable between the identified predictors and knowledge sharing behaviour (knowledge donating and knowledge collecting) and offers a number of propositions which leads to a knowledge sharing model.
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to propose a conceptual model of knowledge sharing behaviour among Malaysian public sector managers. Design/methodology/approach – An extensive literature review method was used to identify and analyse relevant literature in order to propose a knowledge sharing model. Findings – The authors identified three potential predictor groups of knowledge sharing behaviour among Malaysian public sector managers. The groups are intrinsic motivational factors, extrinsic motivational factors and organisational socialisation factors. The paper proposes organisational commitment as the mediating variable between the identified predictors and knowledge sharing behaviour (knowledge donating and knowledge collecting). Research limitations/implications – The paper offers a number of propositions, which leads to a knowledge sharing model. Future research should validate and examine the predictive power of the proposed model. Practical implications – Upon model validation, the paper could offer prac...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Fostering knowledge sharing behaviour among public sector managers: a proposed
model for the Malaysian public service
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to propose a conceptual model of knowledge sharing behaviour
among Malaysian public sector managers. Design/methodology/approach: An extensive
literature review method was used to identify and analyse relevant literature in order to
propose a knowledge sharing model. Findings: The authors identified three potential
predictor groups of knowledge sharing behaviour among Malaysian public sector managers.
The groups are intrinsic motivational factors, extrinsic motivational factors and
organisational socialisation factors. The paper proposes organisational commitment as the
mediating variable between the identified predictors and knowledge sharing behaviour
(knowledge donating and knowledge collecting). Research limitations/implications: The
paper offers a number of propositions, which leads to a knowledge sharing model. Future
research should validate and examine the predictive power of the proposed model. Practical
implications: Upon model validation, the paper could offer practical interventions for human
resource development (HRD) practitioners to assist organisations towards fostering
knowledge sharing behaviour. The paper highlights the importance of employee’s
organisational commitment in order to engage in organizational-related behaviours such as
knowledge sharing. Originality/value: The paper used a new approach in theorising
knowledge sharing behaviour by integrating the General Workplace Commitment Model,
Self-Determination Theory and Social Capital Theory. The suggestion of public service
motivation as one of the intrinsic motivational factors could provide new insights to the HRD
practitioners on fostering knowledge sharing behaviour in the public service subject to model
validation.
Keyword:
Public sector; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Managers;
Knowledge collecting; Knowledge donating
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the antecedents and outcome of open innovation in SMEs and found that top management knowledge value and knowledge creating practices influence open innovation, which, in turn, influences organizational performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors highlight and summarize the possible antecedents and factors that facilitate or impede knowledge management and knowledge sharing in organizations and present a meta-review of 64 articles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Empowering group leaders encourages knowledge sharing: integrating the social exchange theory and positive organizational behavior perspective

TL;DR: The results show that empowering leadership in a work group has a direct cross-level impact on members’ knowledge sharing and that psychological capital partially mediates the relationship between empowering leadership and knowledge sharing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature

TL;DR: The present paper has shown the interconnections between KS and KT, as well as the differences based on the two perspectives of KS (unidirectional/bidirectional) and the two strategies of KT (personalization/codification), and such effort is new in the literature.
Journal ArticleDOI

Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a micro-foundation model for collaborative innovation and technology transfer, based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), which can be used to model the psychological precursors of collaborations.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The theory of planned behavior

TL;DR: Ajzen, 1985, 1987, this article reviewed the theory of planned behavior and some unresolved issues and concluded that the theory is well supported by empirical evidence and that intention to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control; and these intentions, together with perceptions of behavioral control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a paradigm for managing the dynamic aspects of organizational knowledge creating processes, arguing that organizational knowledge is created through a continuous dialogue between tacit and explicit knowledge.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a model that incorporates this overall argument in the form of a series of hypothesized relationships between different dimensions of social capital and the main mechanisms and proces.
Journal ArticleDOI

A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors go beyond the existing distinction between attitudinal and behavioral commitment and argue that commitment, as a psychological state, has at least three separable components reflecting a desire (affective commitment), a need (continuance commitment), and an obligation (normative commitment) to maintain employment in an organization.
Related Papers (5)